I'm not sure about that engine placement. Engines would transfer vibrations directly to the fuselage, and would be difficult to access for maintenance. Maybe over wing placement would be better. I like the rest of this plane. Nice design.
@Supercraft888 description took a big chunk out of your points. Picture presentation would have brought you more points. Make me want to buy a plane like that. Literally to spend million dollars to have it in my hangar. I'm running a day behind schedule with judging the last category and putting up the list of the most pleasurable entries to use. Your entry will most probably be on it. You also have no details on the wings, and control surfaces are such that they give rounded trailing edge, which reduces quality points. Try using fuselage inlets for trailing edge. Use angle option of inlets to get swept trailing edge.
@kingofsteam it would make stuff a bit easier that way, but you can simply stack engines to just barely lift the craft, and then add a tiny bit of dead weight to make it "neutrally buoyant".
@Flightsimulator you need a direct link to an image written as "". Link must end in an image link (example: jpg, png), being a direct link to an image, not the page hosting an image. Don't forget exclamation mark in front.
@chancey21 he deleted account. He'll be back for SR2, or so he says. He deleted just when I was finished rating entries, as that link worked when I placed it there.
@Phoza I accidentally deleted my notes, but I think it was either nose down or nose up attitude, or poor pitch authority. Those are the most common problems on which I deduced performance points.
@newclear cockpit is too small and too far back. Pilot would be landing blind, not able to see the runway over the nose. You should try getting inspiration for layout of aircraft from real planes.
@Thoum lol. Thanks for the entry. Since one of criteria is description, you might want to write a bit about the plane. Also, use tags (not using them reduces points for description).
@LEOPARDtec
@FarrowAirlines
@VerySaltySniper
I'm not sure about that engine placement. Engines would transfer vibrations directly to the fuselage, and would be difficult to access for maintenance. Maybe over wing placement would be better. I like the rest of this plane. Nice design.
@Supercraft888 description took a big chunk out of your points. Picture presentation would have brought you more points. Make me want to buy a plane like that. Literally to spend million dollars to have it in my hangar. I'm running a day behind schedule with judging the last category and putting up the list of the most pleasurable entries to use. Your entry will most probably be on it. You also have no details on the wings, and control surfaces are such that they give rounded trailing edge, which reduces quality points. Try using fuselage inlets for trailing edge. Use angle option of inlets to get swept trailing edge.
@kingofsteam no problem. If you need more, I probably won't be available for a few hours, but I'll be glad to help when I'm back online.
@kingofsteam optimally, through Overload mod. Edit "powerMultiplier" option on engine.
+1@kingofsteam it would make stuff a bit easier that way, but you can simply stack engines to just barely lift the craft, and then add a tiny bit of dead weight to make it "neutrally buoyant".
You can set a jet engine to counter 99.9% of the mass, and fly like it floats in the air.
Impressive build.
@ploptro7 I'm glad you like it.
+1@Flightsimulator you need a direct link to an image written as "". Link must end in an image link (example: jpg, png), being a direct link to an image, not the page hosting an image. Don't forget exclamation mark in front.
Bad idea buddy. Jundroo is not EA.
+1@Authros @ShatSlanger @Benkelmans congratulations. Your rewards are coming.
@Benkelmans
@ShatSlanger
@Othawne
@Sarpanitu
@mikoyanster
@hopotumon
@Authros
@Tully2001
@Razor3278
@Thoum
@GhostHTX
@Supercraft888
@Benkelmans if a white user posted the best entry, write user would win. But platinums are the most experienced, and it shows.
+1@Alien no problem.
@SimpleJoe thanks.
@chancey21 he deleted account. He'll be back for SR2, or so he says. He deleted just when I was finished rating entries, as that link worked when I placed it there.
@jamesPLANESii I could, but then I'd have to give such for all, which would take ages.
@Phoza I accidentally deleted my notes, but I think it was either nose down or nose up attitude, or poor pitch authority. Those are the most common problems on which I deduced performance points.
+1@mikoyanster np
@newclear no problem
@Sgtk no problem.
@LostNight I'm glad you enjoyed.
@newclear cockpit is too small and too far back. Pilot would be landing blind, not able to see the runway over the nose. You should try getting inspiration for layout of aircraft from real planes.
Thanks for the entry. Better late than never :)
@F104Deathtrap lol, thanks
Here's one more: Trainer challenge is being judged. Last chance to push through prop entries, too late for jet ones.
@BogdanX thanks for the offer, but that won't be necessary. You can't spotlight yourself :)
@Blue0Bull you earned them. I'm glad you enjoyed.
@mikoyanster sorry, I can't spotlight you yet. I'll turn your spotlight into an upvote on a mod post.
@BaconAircraft congrats. Your prize will come soon. Chose two of your builds to be spotlighted.
@BogdanX congrats. Unfortunately, I have upvoted all your builds, and I can't spotlight you.
@Phoza
@Sarpanitu
@Alien
@Faded
@grizzlitn
@Homemadeforthepros
@Supermini555
@SangerAircraft
@Sgtk
@KHH
@SimpleJoe
@Ian1231100
@Alienbeef0421
@RCBOSS
@Othawne
@Blue0Bull
@Razor3278
@Deiaa
@LostNight
@DeidaraEnterprises
@TMach5
@EpicPigsterGhost
@DestinyAviation
+1@Tessemi
@Thueerra
It's a tanker and experimental aircraft, not trainer. I can't accept it.
@Quagga Me-262 two seater, right? Two seat version of the famous early jet fighter?
@Thoum lol. Thanks for the entry. Since one of criteria is description, you might want to write a bit about the plane. Also, use tags (not using them reduces points for description).
Thanks for the entry
@Benkelmans link would be fine
@Thoum few more hors. I don't know exactly. I'll probably rate them tomorrow.