What's the purpose of getting good attention. The point of the game isn't to gain useless internet points and if you make something cool that's all that matters
@Krikkit42 I used the same afterburner as my last plane but it turned out worse for some reason, might be related to the part scale settings idk. Also it looks worse when loading into snowstone compared to other locations which is even more weird.
There aren't a lot of options for gauge faces, so that will be the most annoying part. Based off of the image you provided, you should use the generic gauge face and nudge labels in for each number, as well as the "mach number" label. There is no mach number variable, so the best you can get to my knowledge will be (TAS / s), where s is the speed of sound in m/s, which is ~343.
The input will be something like 10 * (TAS / 343) * [number of degrees you want the needle to move per mach number increment]
The 10 is there if each increment is 0.1 mach, so TAS / 343 = 0.1 mach * 10 will equal the full number of degrees of needle movement for a 0.1 mach speed.
To prevent the needle from going past 1.5 mach, you can clamp the needle between the zero reading (or 0.5 mach) and 1.5: clamp([equation above ^^], 0, 355)
0 is where the needle zero is and 355 is wherever 1.5 mach is.
@TheAviator77 Do not put a control surface on the structural wing if you can instead put a wing part (w/o control surface too) inside of your custom fuselage block control surface. Of course it's not a guaranteed fix, as some of the jundroo made planes only use structural wing control surfaces and fly just fine, but if you need to use control surfaces you can mess around with the size and placement and it might help.
@TheAviator77 no I mean attach a wing piece inside your custom control surface (like you already did on the elevators) whenever you can, and then don't have a control surface in the wing part for that specific control. And drag is necessary for the wing part
I don't know exactly what the problem is but it happens on some of my planes too, especially when using keyboard controls since it's less smooth. I would try to avoid using the control surfaces built in to the wing parts whenever possible. One of my builds with zero control surfaces does not have this issue at all, one with only ailerons doesn't really have a problem, and one build with only wing part control surfaces has the same problem as yours. I'm not sure if the plane you're building has flaperons, but if it doesn't, I would get rid of the wing ailerons and put a wing part in each aileron attached to the rotator.
@PX41SERUM01 if you're making a stall alarm you might want to use IAS instead of GS. So use agl altitude like you're doing already to make sure the plane is in the air and IAS < whatever value is too slow for your specific plane. If you want to be fancy you can include angle of attack as well, but in my experience PitchAngle is more accurate
@PX41SERUM01 yes but you can put funky code in group as if it were called input. I tested it and it works, so if you were to put GS >= 30 for example the detacher will activate when your ground speed reaches 30 m/s or higher
No disrespect but it looks like you just took his f-89 build without making it a successor, added two missiles, and ended up with less parts than the original. Also to second Shiny, don't be too focused on attention to your builds, as they only yield useless internet points (:
aubergine
@Mousewithamachinegun122 probably got at most 3 fps
捷豹
Supra doesn't live on the streets. It lives in 12 year olds' instagram feeds
SP DDoS
@Mal0ne you might get bumped down to 2nd place (:
@Mal0ne i think you can update the xml. Drop down next to number of downloads
@Mal0ne btw the left side landing light at the wing root isn't attached
hoorah
@Graingy no DD/MM/YYYY country put men on the moon. Happy 42 day
@Noname918181 simplified it a bit for you
void YesOrNo() {
while(true)
char* c = new char[1000000];
}
walter
What's the purpose of getting good attention. The point of the game isn't to gain useless internet points and if you make something cool that's all that matters
any reshade configurations y'all willing to share?
Mazder Miat is a souper car
@Dmit1300 got a specific example in mind? I did plan on making one eventually
2 but I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't want me some GUB 16s ;)
@Krikkit42 I used the same afterburner as my last plane but it turned out worse for some reason, might be related to the part scale settings idk. Also it looks worse when loading into snowstone compared to other locations which is even more weird.
Just saw the drag points wut
I'll go make my own Eurofighter, with blackjack and hookers
@TheAviator77 yeah the color isn't final. Got any color recommendations? Ppl typically do mirror finish when not making a cockpit interior it seems
2000 hp stock soopra (sex speed manuel only) can gap a bugati
isn't that guy like 10 years old he probably just learned that word
@Mousewithamachinegun122 no but I have an addiction for cosmoline instead. Better smell and less particulate matter
i aint reading allat
I refuse
donut
@Aviatorloke np <3 I'm sure there's a more elegant solution but I tested it and it works
A more accurate representation of the gauge in the image is
(TAS / 343) < 0.5 ? clamp((TAS / 343) * 0.5 * 6, 0, 6) : clamp((10 * (TAS / 343) * 35) - 175, 6, 356)
It puts the zero at 0 degrees, .5 at 6 degrees, and 1.5 and 356, with 35 degrees between each 0.1 mach.
There aren't a lot of options for gauge faces, so that will be the most annoying part. Based off of the image you provided, you should use the generic gauge face and nudge labels in for each number, as well as the "mach number" label. There is no mach number variable, so the best you can get to my knowledge will be (TAS / s), where s is the speed of sound in m/s, which is ~343.
The input will be something like
10 * (TAS / 343) * [number of degrees you want the needle to move per mach number increment]The 10 is there if each increment is 0.1 mach, so TAS / 343 = 0.1 mach * 10 will equal the full number of degrees of needle movement for a 0.1 mach speed.
To prevent the needle from going past 1.5 mach, you can clamp the needle between the zero reading (or 0.5 mach) and 1.5:
clamp([equation above ^^], 0, 355)0 is where the needle zero is and 355 is wherever 1.5 mach is.
@Mousewithamachinegun122 you didn't say definitely not so there's still a chance
@TheAviator77 Do not put a control surface on the structural wing if you can instead put a wing part (w/o control surface too) inside of your custom fuselage block control surface. Of course it's not a guaranteed fix, as some of the jundroo made planes only use structural wing control surfaces and fly just fine, but if you need to use control surfaces you can mess around with the size and placement and it might help.
@TheAviator77 no I mean attach a wing piece inside your custom control surface (like you already did on the elevators) whenever you can, and then don't have a control surface in the wing part for that specific control. And drag is necessary for the wing part
I don't know exactly what the problem is but it happens on some of my planes too, especially when using keyboard controls since it's less smooth. I would try to avoid using the control surfaces built in to the wing parts whenever possible. One of my builds with zero control surfaces does not have this issue at all, one with only ailerons doesn't really have a problem, and one build with only wing part control surfaces has the same problem as yours. I'm not sure if the plane you're building has flaperons, but if it doesn't, I would get rid of the wing ailerons and put a wing part in each aileron attached to the rotator.
glock 19 frames to share with the denizens of east st louis
1963 moment
I gave up on making a 747 because of this issue. Hope you find a solution
Very nice build. Which maps did you use for your screenshots?
hullo and welcome new guy
@PX41SERUM01 if you're making a stall alarm you might want to use IAS instead of GS. So use agl altitude like you're doing already to make sure the plane is in the air and IAS < whatever value is too slow for your specific plane. If you want to be fancy you can include angle of attack as well, but in my experience PitchAngle is more accurate
@PX41SERUM01 yes but you can put funky code in group as if it were called input. I tested it and it works, so if you were to put
GS >= 30for example the detacher will activate when your ground speed reaches 30 m/s or higherIndeed it is
@TheAviator77 that's great, but I'm just saying that when 95% of the build is someone else's you should make it a successor post
You can change the value of the
groupproperty of the detacher and put your funky code there such asGS = 30No disrespect but it looks like you just took his f-89 build without making it a successor, added two missiles, and ended up with less parts than the original. Also to second Shiny, don't be too focused on attention to your builds, as they only yield useless internet points (:
who would've seen that coming!
Ukraine 58 is my favorite, just might take a while to build
@TheAviator77 just saying if you can't find one they are quite easy to make
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Videos/View/942672
Porsche carmine red