@SPairforce
I have been considering making a challenge with the same concept(obviously with different rules and details), I could that, especially since this kind of challenge seems to have gotten good results.
@SPairforce
🤔 Given that Krakabola is now under enemy occupation(and how short the travel time between Wright and Krakabola is), I suggest you focus on defending Wright
@HighMike
(As sad a fact as it is)You are aware that only snowstone is acknowledged by Yourlocalhuman as a possible enemy? I'm tempted to make a challenge similar in concept to this where picking sides is an option.
Operation Fortify
Station various Rolling Pillboxes, Tarantula SPAAGs, and Taurel T-11 Spear SPAAs around Wright Island, and have HO XXIIs on 27/7 air patrol, to avoid any middle-of-the-night surprises.
@Skywolf277i
Hold off on the second phase if you can, I have a few more ground assault builds that could be very useful(like a transport for my mobile pillbox).
@Yourlocalhuman
The first two, you got a point. As for satellites, there doesn't seem to be anything that can keep a build stationary in the sky, and the allowed weapons are found on satellite weaponry. But yes, we could use some land vehicles(probably will work on that).
Have BV 205C collapse entrance to Undermountain Docking Bay to deny safe
anchorage for ships and submarines, while two Ho XXIIs destroy enemy aircraft on
the ground at whatever airfield they are present (Avalanche, Glacier Park, Tundra).
Operation Grand Slam
Have BV 205C collapse entrance to Undermountain Docking Bay to deny safe anchorage for ships and submarines, while two Ho XXIIs destroy enemy aircraft on the ground at whatever airfield they are present (Avalanche, Glacier Park, Tundra).
@Yourlocalhuman
You may have seen my conversation with HighMike, and just to be clear I am not going to disregard the rules, I not that kind of guy. But to address my stance in this war, do you mind if I relaxe the weapon rule(I'll still use the stock weapons used, but my own spin)?
@Yourlocalhuman
First, that happens a lot. Second, the challenge said it would last a week but then ended prematurely. I feel that's grounds for war. And if that results in a sort of "part two" challenge from either of us, so be it. Besides it's fun to build combat aircraft. Also, snowstone is definitely aggressive, trust me.
@Tsuchiisan
If you remove all the airbrakes, by the way, it becomes rather mobile friendly. I made a second aircraft in this style and it also was surprisingly stable and maneuverable. So maybe their is something to making planes with just the blocks ((but not the excessive airbrakes. Nothing can rationalize that).
@SemedianIndustries
Ok but seriously, I mostly made it as a joke, and am not seriously trying to get in on the upvotes these builds(somehow) get, not that I can't seem to figure out what would get me lots of upvotes.
@Kennneth I hope I don't sound like I'm Complaining, but a lot of my builds don't get a lot of upvotes. By that I mean most of the time they rarely exceed one digits. And some I put a decent amount of effort(as in detailed cockpits).
Yeah, the site really needs some funky tree and variable tutorials, I only started using the variable system recently because this user made a explanation built for their tank.
@SPairforce
I have been considering making a challenge with the same concept(obviously with different rules and details), I could that, especially since this kind of challenge seems to have gotten good results.
@Skywolf277i
Gotcha. 👍
@Skywolf277i
I should have my next vehicles ready by then(I hope).
@theaviator22223rd
+1Congratulations, you just gave me my next tank. 👍
@Skywolf277i
I have one last build before I'm ready to make one large push.
@Yourlocalhuman
For some reason my latest build didn't register as a successor. This is the build.
@SupremeDorian
It is possible you could make this a successor to the War Challenge? It was supposed to be
@SPairforce I noticed that too, odd.
@Yourlocalhuman
Completed Operation Sanburn
@SPairforce
🤔 Given that Krakabola is now under enemy occupation(and how short the travel time between Wright and Krakabola is), I suggest you focus on defending Wright
@lewishasnoiq
I do believe so. That why I made a operation preparing to fend off an invasion.
@HighMike
(As sad a fact as it is)You are aware that only snowstone is acknowledged by Yourlocalhuman as a possible enemy? I'm tempted to make a challenge similar in concept to this where picking sides is an option.
Operation Fortify
+1Station various Rolling Pillboxes, Tarantula SPAAGs, and Taurel T-11 Spear SPAAs around Wright Island, and have HO XXIIs on 27/7 air patrol, to avoid any middle-of-the-night surprises.
@Skywolf277i
Hold off on the second phase if you can, I have a few more ground assault builds that could be very useful(like a transport for my mobile pillbox).
@BomberDiesel
+1Are you a mobile user, cause it only seems to appear on PC.(I tried once and got the exact same thing).
@Yourlocalhuman
I would like to put 15 of my 20 points into finishing the anti-radiation missile.
@Yourlocalhuman
+1A movable pillbox
If you want a full interior version, let me know.
@SPairforce
I intend to make some land invasion weapons.
@Yourlocalhuman
The first two, you got a point. As for satellites, there doesn't seem to be anything that can keep a build stationary in the sky, and the allowed weapons are found on satellite weaponry. But yes, we could use some land vehicles(probably will work on that).
Completed Operation Hand of God.
@SPairforce
It means you haven't done any operations yet. You get points for completing those operations.
@Sakorsky
@Yourlocalhuman
Put them into JARS-1.
@Yourlocalhuman
Completed Operation Slasher.
@SPairforce
What's up with the participants list?
@Yourlocalhuman
I'm in.
Operation Grand Slam
+1Have BV 205C collapse entrance to Undermountain Docking Bay to deny safe anchorage for ships and submarines, while two Ho XXIIs destroy enemy aircraft on the ground at whatever airfield they are present (Avalanche, Glacier Park, Tundra).
My aircraft are ready.
@Yourlocalhuman
Just curious, is the alignment that HighMike and I taken acknowledged?
@SPairforce
I think it's just between @HighMike & I, ask him for sure.
@Yourlocalhuman
You may have seen my conversation with HighMike, and just to be clear I am not going to disregard the rules, I not that kind of guy. But to address my stance in this war, do you mind if I relaxe the weapon rule(I'll still use the stock weapons used, but my own spin)?
@HighMike
I too am part of the opposition. Mostly because I had brilliant ideas for war planes and still intend to use them(if a little modified).
@SPairforce
I'm already building my war planes, as we speak.
@Yourlocalhuman
First, that happens a lot. Second, the challenge said it would last a week but then ended prematurely. I feel that's grounds for war. And if that results in a sort of "part two" challenge from either of us, so be it. Besides it's fun to build combat aircraft. Also, snowstone is definitely aggressive, trust me.
@Tsuchiisan
If you remove all the airbrakes, by the way, it becomes rather mobile friendly. I made a second aircraft in this style and it also was surprisingly stable and maneuverable. So maybe their is something to making planes with just the blocks ((but not the excessive airbrakes. Nothing can rationalize that).
@MrCOPTY
+1Behold, my creation. Also, did I tag correctly? I don't know if I did.
@SemedianIndustries
+1Ok but seriously, I mostly made it as a joke, and am not seriously trying to get in on the upvotes these builds(somehow) get, not that I can't seem to figure out what would get me lots of upvotes.
@SemedianIndustries
Oh, it gets worse. I land this thing on the USS Beast and land runways. I CAN'T LAND ALL OTHER PLANES, especially on the carrier.
Important Note: Do Not Break Under Any Circumstances.
@MrCOPTY
@Rocketguy2079
+1Frankly, considering how much effort goes into looking terrible, the offshoots sort of earn the large upvote count.
@MrCOPTY
+1🤔 Suddenly I have an idea...
@Kennneth I hope I don't sound like I'm Complaining, but a lot of my builds don't get a lot of upvotes. By that I mean most of the time they rarely exceed one digits. And some I put a decent amount of effort(as in detailed cockpits).
If you find any problems, please let me know.
Very nice.
Yeah, the site really needs some funky tree and variable tutorials, I only started using the variable system recently because this user made a explanation built for their tank.
+2Put
-Activate8in the Activation Group section.@V(does this count as asking repeatedly? I don't want to seem like I'm pestering)
@V