Absolutely love this. I've been working on an rate of climb indicator for a while but couldn't get it to this level of accuracy. Hope you don't mind me borrowing the equation.
@Noname918181 mixing up random elements usually results in random results.
Lithium isn't a great idea for an armour material. It tends to lower the melting point of a material its alloyed to and allow for better conductivity. Which makes it great for batteries and circuitry. Metallurgy too. But not for protective purposes.
@Itirv123 Fair enough, fair enough. I do agree. Part of the reason is that building custom tracks would make the part count skyrocket. Tradeoffs man, tradeoffs.
@Zanedavid Ah, that can easily be done. I'll upload a version with the tracks and lights removed.
@Dinoairplanes Which vehicle? I haven't played Arma 3. Would be interested to see it.
@Itirv123 Originally I wasn't going to reply but I don't see what the problem with using mods is. I understand it limits builds from IOS users but it also simplifies some of the building process for certain builds. I have lots of builds that don't use mods which you can freely download.
But don't tell me what I should and shouldn't use, thank you.
You'd need the fine tuner mod to do it.
When scaling up or down, everything has to initially be the same scale. So if you have a 6,6,6 scale fuselage block then every other part must be 6,6,6 scale. Otherwise, when you scale, you'll end up with inconsistencies in position.
Using fine tuner, you use the scale function. In the bottom right corner, there's a tickbox. Unticking that will allow you to scale the whole item. Secondly, turn relative scale off. Then just scale to desired dimensions.
@KerlonceauxIndustries Aw, don't say that. Alas, my computer finally lost to detail and scale. I wish I could have fitted it out with a full amphibious loadout (but then we'd be looking at a 4000 part build)
Superb looks and it flies really well.
+1Would have preferred if you uploaded it unlisted so that people didn't accidentally upvote it here.
But if your intentions were harmless it's no issue
I wanna ask why you've reposted my build with only a colour change
Absolutely love this. I've been working on an rate of climb indicator for a while but couldn't get it to this level of accuracy. Hope you don't mind me borrowing the equation.
@exosuit yus!
@teodor99 thanks!
@KerlonceauxIndustries swift as always, thanks
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/VO69dE/Tiran-Peregrine-F-3
Link to the post
This boi thicc
I'm a simple man. I see a mobile suit, I upvote
+1Pros:
Pretty good looking, and not a bad concept. Worth an upvote for sure.
Cons:
+3Stop trying to compensate with the ortho camera man, it makes the build look so weird
Words don't do justice to how impressed I am with this build. You've done it again!
+1Once again you've shown you're capable of providing excellent ships with great features. Love it.
Really great rendition of one of my favourites.
Say what I will about the poor scale, the design is pretty good overall.
@KerlonceauxIndustries THANKS!
+1@Noname918181 mixing up random elements usually results in random results.
Lithium isn't a great idea for an armour material. It tends to lower the melting point of a material its alloyed to and allow for better conductivity. Which makes it great for batteries and circuitry. Metallurgy too. But not for protective purposes.
Certainly not for stealth as far as I know.
I have to ask, what does the lithium actually do in the alloy you've made? I understand this is pseudoscience but pseudoscience needs some foundation.
@Armyguy1534 many thanks!
@exosuit yeah, same. It worked well before being scaled down. I'm going to work on it a bit and give you to release as a plug and play part.
@Mustang51 thank you!
Danke @D0M1N420R
Not half bad at all. Nice work
@Trainzo @yoshicraze @Strikefighter04
+1Thanks, you guys!
I really wish I could spotlight this
@DeidaraEnterprises yes
@NirvashTec money well spent
@NFIGMT Thank you so much. I think it could do with some refinement but I'm pleased you like it.
@KerlonceauxIndustries To you too
+1@TrislandianAlliance the ottomans did? When?
@CrashFighter05 we'll cart it on land and drag it to you, haha
T
Absolutely T
@ChiChiWerx Yes, it ended up being quite inspired by the super sabre, although the original design was closer to the MiG-15. Thanks.
I gotta say, I love this. I did an F-100 inspired build as well but this is really good.
@MSGamezYXZ360 Thanks!
It me
@DeidaraEnterprises W.H.O.O.P.S Lemme edit that in rq
@Z3RO Thanks
@Itirv123 Fair enough, fair enough. I do agree. Part of the reason is that building custom tracks would make the part count skyrocket. Tradeoffs man, tradeoffs.
@Zanedavid Ah, that can easily be done. I'll upload a version with the tracks and lights removed.
@Dinoairplanes Which vehicle? I haven't played Arma 3. Would be interested to see it.
and thanks for the upvotes, all of you.
@Stargazzer Not at all, this deserves it
+1@Zanedavid Thanks. I'll look into replacing the tracks and lights at a later date for an unmodded version.
@Itirv123 Originally I wasn't going to reply but I don't see what the problem with using mods is. I understand it limits builds from IOS users but it also simplifies some of the building process for certain builds. I have lots of builds that don't use mods which you can freely download.
But don't tell me what I should and shouldn't use, thank you.
@Jim1the1Squid The relative scale bit is important so everything moves together.
@Jim1the1Squid A couple of points:
You'd need the fine tuner mod to do it.
When scaling up or down, everything has to initially be the same scale. So if you have a 6,6,6 scale fuselage block then every other part must be 6,6,6 scale. Otherwise, when you scale, you'll end up with inconsistencies in position.
Using fine tuner, you use the scale function. In the bottom right corner, there's a tickbox. Unticking that will allow you to scale the whole item. Secondly, turn relative scale off. Then just scale to desired dimensions.
@Armyguy1534 Unintentionally so. It has significant differences from the F-16
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/0C2081/Kandake-class-LHD
@Jim1the1Squid @PositivePlanes
@KerlonceauxIndustries Also, thanks as always.
@KerlonceauxIndustries Aw, don't say that. Alas, my computer finally lost to detail and scale. I wish I could have fitted it out with a full amphibious loadout (but then we'd be looking at a 4000 part build)
+1@Saber89
+1ゴゴゴゴ
@NirvashTec very cool, thank you
+1@lancelot3340 Yeah, I've had that parallel drawn before and i do kinda see it. It's cool in a weird way.