15.4k Dastin Comments

  • McDonnell Douglas F-4B Phantom II 4.7 years ago

    Superb looks and it flies really well.

    +1
  • Tiran Peregrine F.3 4.7 years ago

    Would have preferred if you uploaded it unlisted so that people didn't accidentally upvote it here.

    But if your intentions were harmless it's no issue

  • Tiran Peregrine F.3 4.7 years ago

    I wanna ask why you've reposted my build with only a colour change

  • Almost 100% Accurate Rate of Climb Indicator (Vario) 4.7 years ago

    Absolutely love this. I've been working on an rate of climb indicator for a while but couldn't get it to this level of accuracy. Hope you don't mind me borrowing the equation.

  • Tiran Peregrine F.3 4.7 years ago

    @exosuit yus!

  • Tiran Peregrine F.3 4.7 years ago

    @teodor99 thanks!

  • Tiran Peregrine F.3 4.7 years ago

    @KerlonceauxIndustries swift as always, thanks

    +1
  • LET THE PISTONS ROAR 4.7 years ago

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/VO69dE/Tiran-Peregrine-F-3

    Link to the post

  • SB-262 SturmAdler 4.7 years ago

    This boi thicc

  • MSN-06S Sinanju 4.8 years ago

    I'm a simple man. I see a mobile suit, I upvote

    +1
  • Plesiosaur-Class Helicopter Cruiser 4.8 years ago

    Pros:

    Pretty good looking, and not a bad concept. Worth an upvote for sure.

    Cons:
    Stop trying to compensate with the ortho camera man, it makes the build look so weird

    +3
  • M134 4.8 years ago

    Words don't do justice to how impressed I am with this build. You've done it again!

    +1
  • Kiev Class Heavy Aviation Cruiser 4.8 years ago

    Once again you've shown you're capable of providing excellent ships with great features. Love it.

  • Cheng du JF17(FC-1) Lightning 4.8 years ago

    Really great rendition of one of my favourites.

  • HMK9 Norton 4.9 years ago

    Say what I will about the poor scale, the design is pretty good overall.

  • Dejen Gale 4.9 years ago

    @KerlonceauxIndustries THANKS!

    +1
  • WW2 technical background Vol.4 4.9 years ago

    @Noname918181 mixing up random elements usually results in random results.

    Lithium isn't a great idea for an armour material. It tends to lower the melting point of a material its alloyed to and allow for better conductivity. Which makes it great for batteries and circuitry. Metallurgy too. But not for protective purposes.

    Certainly not for stealth as far as I know.

  • WW2 technical background Vol.4 4.9 years ago

    I have to ask, what does the lithium actually do in the alloy you've made? I understand this is pseudoscience but pseudoscience needs some foundation.

  • Altica-Harvey Wildcat 4.9 years ago

    @Armyguy1534 many thanks!

  • Altica-Harvey Wildcat 4.9 years ago

    @exosuit yeah, same. It worked well before being scaled down. I'm going to work on it a bit and give you to release as a plug and play part.

  • Altica-Harvey Wildcat 4.9 years ago

    @Mustang51 thank you!

  • Altica-Harvey Wildcat 4.9 years ago

    Danke @D0M1N420R

  • North American B-25J Mitchell 4.9 years ago

    Not half bad at all. Nice work

  • Altica-Harvey Wildcat 4.9 years ago

    @Trainzo @yoshicraze @Strikefighter04
    Thanks, you guys!

    +1
  • He-300 Hecht highest detail .sPs. 5.0 years ago

    I really wish I could spotlight this

  • Haile Selassie-class Destroyer 5.0 years ago

    @DeidaraEnterprises yes

  • Haile Selassie-class Destroyer 5.0 years ago

    @NirvashTec money well spent

  • Haile Selassie-class Destroyer 5.0 years ago

    @NFIGMT Thank you so much. I think it could do with some refinement but I'm pleased you like it.

    @KerlonceauxIndustries To you too

    +1
  • Coming soon to a port near you... 5.0 years ago

    @TrislandianAlliance the ottomans did? When?

  • Coming soon to a port near you... 5.0 years ago

    @CrashFighter05 we'll cart it on land and drag it to you, haha

  • Yak 15 Multiplying 5.0 years ago

    T
    Absolutely T

  • | Tiran Industries | Finch F.2 | 5.0 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx Yes, it ended up being quite inspired by the super sabre, although the original design was closer to the MiG-15. Thanks.

  • CBJT-1 Couteau 5.0 years ago

    I gotta say, I love this. I did an F-100 inspired build as well but this is really good.

  • | Tiran Industries | Finch F.2 | 5.1 years ago

    @MSGamezYXZ360 Thanks!

  • DIO 5.1 years ago

    It me

  • Bishoftu Land Systems | CV2000-FS1 Sniper 5.1 years ago

    @DeidaraEnterprises W.H.O.O.P.S Lemme edit that in rq

  • Bishoftu Land Systems | CV2000-FS1 Sniper 5.1 years ago

    @Z3RO Thanks

  • Bishoftu Land Systems | CV2000-FS1 Sniper 5.1 years ago

    @Itirv123 Fair enough, fair enough. I do agree. Part of the reason is that building custom tracks would make the part count skyrocket. Tradeoffs man, tradeoffs.

    @Zanedavid Ah, that can easily be done. I'll upload a version with the tracks and lights removed.

    @Dinoairplanes Which vehicle? I haven't played Arma 3. Would be interested to see it.

    and thanks for the upvotes, all of you.

  • Light Corvette VIPER (Sange Class)_ 5.1 years ago

    @Stargazzer Not at all, this deserves it

    +1
  • Bishoftu Land Systems | CV2000-FS1 Sniper 5.1 years ago

    @Zanedavid Thanks. I'll look into replacing the tracks and lights at a later date for an unmodded version.

  • Bishoftu Land Systems | CV2000-FS1 Sniper 5.1 years ago

    @Itirv123 Originally I wasn't going to reply but I don't see what the problem with using mods is. I understand it limits builds from IOS users but it also simplifies some of the building process for certain builds. I have lots of builds that don't use mods which you can freely download.

    But don't tell me what I should and shouldn't use, thank you.

  • Kandake-class LHD 5.2 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid The relative scale bit is important so everything moves together.

  • Kandake-class LHD 5.2 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid A couple of points:

    You'd need the fine tuner mod to do it.
    When scaling up or down, everything has to initially be the same scale. So if you have a 6,6,6 scale fuselage block then every other part must be 6,6,6 scale. Otherwise, when you scale, you'll end up with inconsistencies in position.

    Using fine tuner, you use the scale function. In the bottom right corner, there's a tickbox. Unticking that will allow you to scale the whole item. Secondly, turn relative scale off. Then just scale to desired dimensions.

  • Tiran-Altica | A-17H Osprey | Multirole fighter 5.2 years ago

    @Armyguy1534 Unintentionally so. It has significant differences from the F-16

  • A little teaser; "Leaving for sea trials" 5.2 years ago

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/0C2081/Kandake-class-LHD

    @Jim1the1Squid @PositivePlanes

  • Kandake-class LHD 5.2 years ago

    @KerlonceauxIndustries Also, thanks as always.

  • Kandake-class LHD 5.2 years ago

    @KerlonceauxIndustries Aw, don't say that. Alas, my computer finally lost to detail and scale. I wish I could have fitted it out with a full amphibious loadout (but then we'd be looking at a 4000 part build)

    +1
  • Kandake-class LHD 5.2 years ago

    @Saber89
    ゴゴゴゴ

    +1
  • Kandake-class LHD 5.2 years ago

    @NirvashTec very cool, thank you

    +1
  • Tiran-Altica | A-17H Osprey | Multirole fighter 5.2 years ago

    @lancelot3340 Yeah, I've had that parallel drawn before and i do kinda see it. It's cool in a weird way.