Well I have SP on iOS, so what were you trying to say?
@temporaryaccount
Anyway, good job @Neenyboy, just need to sharpen up some skills and you'll be pretty good.
You know, you need a bit more patience @masterhunter. These guys are trying to help you and all you're doing is yapping away information that is unhelpful or incorrect. Show some respect please!
He's on windows, so he should be able to download Overload and set the control surface to VTOL, plus generally, the stock method is very unreliable and can even give the opposite effect.
@Jengstrom
Well what you lack in form you make up in function. Not many can create functioning bombsights, I wouldn't even try for fear of losing my mind. @Weaverfish
While I'm sure everyone would love to have that, as spefyjerbf said, they'd most likely be stock for the sake of easier implementation and game performance, choosing 2 decent 300 part fighters and a 400 part bomber, with a total part count of 1000, running individually too, would be quite taxing for lower end devices. This isn't considering the plane that your using, which could be well over 300 parts. @marcox43
Thank you, I've managed to finish the cockpit with the gun sight installed. The camo has been finalised. All that's needed to do is the landing gear and insignias. @ChaMikey
Replicas go far in the SP community, especially WW2 planes or large commercial airliners. Fictional planes are a bit of a niche and aren't as popular as replicas. Maybe trying out a replica could be the attention that your seeking. But please don't pump out replicas that took only an hour, we already have enough of those. Build something of quality, something that takes time and effort, that's what will attract people. Just look at my first plane, poor compared to my standards now, but good enough to get people interested.
You'll have to find someone else, maybe the extras that you rejected in the recruitment forum post like Mostly and others? I've abandoned the project, and thus don't want to work on it much, hence why. @temporaryaccount
That antonov took him 6 months to make, all these builds you've listed take more than a week to do. Time is of the essence, I suggest you work on honing your skills down, learn tricks and tips, get accustomed to the fine tuner/ or part transform tool and knuckle down. You've potential, but you just need to work on it. Plus, don't think about the upvotes to much. Sure they're nice, but you can easily become dillusional and almost addicted to the point were it is taking the fun out of the game. Anyway, good luck on your fresh start, I look forward to seeing what you will build with a new look.
Ooo, it's a hard one. I'll have to side with Bacon on this one. While SilverWolfs dials are amazing, Bacons captured the fusalage and control surfaces more so. Either way, good job to both Bacon and Silver, brilliant stuff!
Smart remark hey, just go through the predecesor chain to see how long this took. I know what your referring to and we don't need that here. @alexchub1
To be honest, I saw this coming, which is a shame. I guess when you got to Plat so quick you exhausted all your options. You'll be missed with all contributions you've made to my builds and to this community, but nonetheless life must go on, and when you do comeback, you'll comeback better than ever!
You can always give a tribute in other ways. A simple forum post saying goodbye, a plane build dedicated to him (an actual build, not a memorial post) and other ways too. @Awsomur
Managed to grab one off another build
It's just how I work, sorry for the hassle, thanks for your support again.
@temporaryaccount
Cheers!
@SledDriver
@Sgtk
@MrVaulttech
Thank you
@RCBOSS
@RyneKuczy
@TTHHSSSS
Thanks guys!
@MrDoolittle
@Dumpworks
Yeah, most of my combat testing was done with dogfights, this plane managed to win the majority of the time. Thanks once again!
@F4f879
Thanks guys, looking forward to your builds too!
@F4f879 @EpicPigster1
Well I have SP on iOS, so what were you trying to say?
@temporaryaccount
Anyway, good job @Neenyboy, just need to sharpen up some skills and you'll be pretty good.
I'd need to experiment a lot, still very impressive might I say. @Weaverfish
You know, you need a bit more patience @masterhunter. These guys are trying to help you and all you're doing is yapping away information that is unhelpful or incorrect. Show some respect please!
Thank you, I had to get some external help regarding XML but this was mostly accomplished using the Part Transform tool in 1.7 update. @ACMECo1940
He's on windows, so he should be able to download Overload and set the control surface to VTOL, plus generally, the stock method is very unreliable and can even give the opposite effect.
@Jengstrom
You can also set a wing control surface to VTOL to act as flaps, which is generally more reliable and commonly used. @Jengstrom
Well what you lack in form you make up in function. Not many can create functioning bombsights, I wouldn't even try for fear of losing my mind. @Weaverfish
Ok, I must admit it is pretty good, would be suitable for the job too. I could see them using user creations, but we'll see about that.
@marcox43
That's what I thought of, but then you can't damage them like a normal SP plane.
@Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing
Thanks, yours looks pretty good, just need to refine it a bit more. @Datom
While I'm sure everyone would love to have that, as spefyjerbf said, they'd most likely be stock for the sake of easier implementation and game performance, choosing 2 decent 300 part fighters and a 400 part bomber, with a total part count of 1000, running individually too, would be quite taxing for lower end devices. This isn't considering the plane that your using, which could be well over 300 parts. @marcox43
Thank you, I've managed to finish the cockpit with the gun sight installed. The camo has been finalised. All that's needed to do is the landing gear and insignias. @ChaMikey
You physically cannot make this mobile friendly, the fusalage itself is 1000 parts, unless you don't want it to fly.
@D0g
I wish but no, in the land down under, we don't have very much aircraft at all.
@Flash0of0green
Cause of the bomb sight, which works really well might I add, and it's not lame @BACconcordepilot, it's cool.
I uploaded a teaser for one of these. Exact same model too. Looks good.
@Aftershock
Thank you for the upvote spree, but there's really no need
Looks like the peeps want an open cockpit, better not disappoint them :D
@EpicPigster1
It ain't done yet, still working on the camo, adding a gunsight and other stuff too. @F4f879
Oh, hold on while I get them
@temporaryaccount
It should've been featured the second it was uploaded, also did you get the tag?
@temporaryaccount
No problem
@CjrLdy
Yes also what @Brields95 said, the newest section is usually full of planes that are... of a lower quality than those on the hottest page
This is inspirational work! 6 months! Can't believe how good this is!
@CjrLdy
Replicas go far in the SP community, especially WW2 planes or large commercial airliners. Fictional planes are a bit of a niche and aren't as popular as replicas. Maybe trying out a replica could be the attention that your seeking. But please don't pump out replicas that took only an hour, we already have enough of those. Build something of quality, something that takes time and effort, that's what will attract people. Just look at my first plane, poor compared to my standards now, but good enough to get people interested.
I would've loved to see both, but it's up to you. Then again, I've yet to see you build an open cockpit, maybe you should try it before you depart?
Try the VTOL...
@CRJ900Pilot
It should, but SilverWolf is a Plat, they generally don't feature Platinum player planes. @Solarisaircraft
You'll have to find someone else, maybe the extras that you rejected in the recruitment forum post like Mostly and others? I've abandoned the project, and thus don't want to work on it much, hence why. @temporaryaccount
That antonov took him 6 months to make, all these builds you've listed take more than a week to do. Time is of the essence, I suggest you work on honing your skills down, learn tricks and tips, get accustomed to the fine tuner/ or part transform tool and knuckle down. You've potential, but you just need to work on it. Plus, don't think about the upvotes to much. Sure they're nice, but you can easily become dillusional and almost addicted to the point were it is taking the fun out of the game. Anyway, good luck on your fresh start, I look forward to seeing what you will build with a new look.
While I'm sure many would want to, they simply cannot because all the parts are different in 1.7 because of the new damage model.
Wow, very extensive list. (Noticed you added by Bombardier CS100 :D )
Ooo, it's a hard one. I'll have to side with Bacon on this one. While SilverWolfs dials are amazing, Bacons captured the fusalage and control surfaces more so. Either way, good job to both Bacon and Silver, brilliant stuff!
Smart remark hey, just go through the predecesor chain to see how long this took. I know what your referring to and we don't need that here. @alexchub1
Love the control surfaces, they look awesome. Both those entries are better than what I could ever make.
No problem, those dials are godly!
@MrSilverWolf
Yeah as both comments said, there's already an option for that in the game settings.
To be honest, I saw this coming, which is a shame. I guess when you got to Plat so quick you exhausted all your options. You'll be missed with all contributions you've made to my builds and to this community, but nonetheless life must go on, and when you do comeback, you'll comeback better than ever!
Oh my lord, that cockpit is so awesome!
Well, it had to happen.
Latent been busy lately...
You can always give a tribute in other ways. A simple forum post saying goodbye, a plane build dedicated to him (an actual build, not a memorial post) and other ways too. @Awsomur
No problem,
@MrDoolittle
Well you're much better at vehicles than I am, you could probably pull that off better than this.
@Rugpeersdude
I think it looks good, just a few extra details and it'll be great.