Ugh, your absolutely too obsessed over upvotes. Play the game for fun, not for some counter on your build. Whether it's fair, well no, but life is never fair. @pavthepilot
They're not better nor worse because they're not the same.
What your asking me to do is to tell me which ones a better, TV or pasta, two completely unrelated topics
@pavthepilot
Well, you asked for it.
I will now dissect your plane:
1.) Defult cockpit is a no no. They just look bad, really easy to make a fusalage cockpit too, better shape ect.
2.) Fusalage shape is clucky and wrong. The real fusalage follows back behind the cockpit (unless it's the Yak 1b), it's smooth too, unlike this. This shouldn't be hard to do, especially with being able to type sizes in.
3.) Tail, it's just not good. Try to use fusalage to make a smoother vertical stab and horizontal stab, they really not very nice right now
4.) Landing gear, it's not correct. WW2 planes have singular wheeled landing gear, with resizable wheels this shouldn't be hard. Plus with the parts transform tool, why didn't you nudge it into the wing so it looked connected. Also wheels are generally black not white.
5.) The wings. While the shaping might be alright, I highly encourage you to expose the ailerons, I personally know of people who despise hidden ailerons.
6.) Extras: Fusalage is generally too thin. Wings lack the correct dihedral. Proportions are a bit off.
If you think that was harsh, I'm sorry, but whining wasn't gonna do anything so I gave to you straight up, no sugar coating.
We all start bad, it's just how we go about getting better. Time is of the essence!
Would be great for fuel gauges, speedometers ect. Generally good for cockpits. Could also be useful for dynamic parts as well, such as low pressure (speed) slats, moving air intakes ect.
This is a very nice build, however with some time and effort you could definitely clean up the fusalage a bit, making it smoother and more flush, unless you were aiming for that look. Love the cockpit by the way, shows what us iOS users can now accomplish.
@BarrettTheFerret
Just hang on there, no need to get so hasty. The wings are gonna bend, have fowler flaps and a realistic airfoil. I haven't even finished the cockpit yet, let alone the wings.
@temporaryaccount
Oh, seems like there wasn't one after all, I just assumed that the hole on the nose cover was the cantreline cannon. Good pickup @GREDDYsky , shame it's too late to fix.
I noticed that during combat testing, yet forgot to fix it. Have you tried setting it to no collisions, I think it has something to do with the multiple pieces in the prop housing.
@Zerokiller3
As much as I'd love to, I generally don't do the same plane more than once or twice. I'm sure you can find a better version somewhere elsewhere. @AstonMartin145
How come my landing gear for the F8F worked fine?
Strange, never happens to me
Pretty sure it's based on metres, but I'm not too sure. Just check how big a block (1x1x1) is and then scale via that.
Well, you can always upload less oftenly, you know, quality over quantity?
@ACMECo1940
Ugh, your absolutely too obsessed over upvotes. Play the game for fun, not for some counter on your build. Whether it's fair, well no, but life is never fair. @pavthepilot
He has 84 followers, you have 35, he has a bigger audience that's all. @pavthepilot
They're not better nor worse because they're not the same.
What your asking me to do is to tell me which ones a better, TV or pasta, two completely unrelated topics
@pavthepilot
Well, you asked for it.
I will now dissect your plane:
1.) Defult cockpit is a no no. They just look bad, really easy to make a fusalage cockpit too, better shape ect.
2.) Fusalage shape is clucky and wrong. The real fusalage follows back behind the cockpit (unless it's the Yak 1b), it's smooth too, unlike this. This shouldn't be hard to do, especially with being able to type sizes in.
3.) Tail, it's just not good. Try to use fusalage to make a smoother vertical stab and horizontal stab, they really not very nice right now
4.) Landing gear, it's not correct. WW2 planes have singular wheeled landing gear, with resizable wheels this shouldn't be hard. Plus with the parts transform tool, why didn't you nudge it into the wing so it looked connected. Also wheels are generally black not white.
5.) The wings. While the shaping might be alright, I highly encourage you to expose the ailerons, I personally know of people who despise hidden ailerons.
6.) Extras: Fusalage is generally too thin. Wings lack the correct dihedral. Proportions are a bit off.
If you think that was harsh, I'm sorry, but whining wasn't gonna do anything so I gave to you straight up, no sugar coating.
We all start bad, it's just how we go about getting better. Time is of the essence!
@pavthepilot
Would be great for fuel gauges, speedometers ect. Generally good for cockpits. Could also be useful for dynamic parts as well, such as low pressure (speed) slats, moving air intakes ect.
Well it seems like you care about the upvotes heh?
Well @pavthepilot, do you want advice?
Time... simply time
There's no cheap trick to it.
I think, you use rotators set to like 5° on floppy, and build each segment separately
It just makes the process longer, having it revert back to integers, think it's a bug
Oh, nice
@ACMECo1940
Why? Why what?
Well according to you then patience is a virtue.
@temporaryaccount
I'm surprised you and Epicpigster managed to find out, the sentence is literally the smallest and most hidden part of the Bio, @temporaryaccount
This is a very nice build, however with some time and effort you could definitely clean up the fusalage a bit, making it smoother and more flush, unless you were aiming for that look. Love the cockpit by the way, shows what us iOS users can now accomplish.
@BarrettTheFerret
It works now,
@hopotumon
Um, just says 400...
No problem, it looks good so far
@Dllama4
Good job getting featured, was about time they changed it around.
Just hang on there, no need to get so hasty. The wings are gonna bend, have fowler flaps and a realistic airfoil. I haven't even finished the cockpit yet, let alone the wings.
@temporaryaccount
Well, have you tired?
Update on the B-25?
@temporaryaccount
Hmm, well currently it's like 2:1 scale, it's pretty ambitious. @BUZALIC
Yeah but is this like 1:1 scale or 2:1 or something like that?
@BUZALIC
As much as I admire the fusalage shape, don't you think it's a bit big in general?
Thank you, these are some of my better builds
@FierceNights
Well, your first attempt was better than all my other attempts. Anyways, very nice!
Oof,
That's harsh
Good to see this is out, glad I could help by the way
Thank you,
@Skywalket
Thank you,
@ianzhou
Oh, seems like there wasn't one after all, I just assumed that the hole on the nose cover was the cantreline cannon. Good pickup @GREDDYsky , shame it's too late to fix.
You never fail to disappoint
It would be, it's wide open, you'd be able to see everything in front the of you. @Skywalket
Cheers
@Maxwell1
Nice, how was it?
@Skywalket
Thank you
@Kazin @AnOlympicWalnut
Nice to know, it's good you'll still be sorta here
@EpicPigster1
He's alive!!!
@Johndfg
I personally don't take a sketch, but I will occasionally draw an outline around a picture of my build to check the planes profile.
No problem, congrats once again
@Rodrigo110
Well deserved, good job!
Yeah, I know. Are you confused with the insignia on the tail?
That was on all British WW2 planes. Just look it up.
@Realibrahim
I'd love it, but I don't know how the implementation would work...
Ah, well I can't help you there, unless you remove the black covering completely, that would fix it. @Zerokiller3
Thanks for the spotlight
@QingyuZhou
I noticed that during combat testing, yet forgot to fix it. Have you tried setting it to no collisions, I think it has something to do with the multiple pieces in the prop housing.
@Zerokiller3
Thanks, there's a few things missing but that's was mainly due to keeping the part count reasonable.
@Datom
He said it wasn't, but it does look remarkably similar. I believe him though, he's built up a good credibility.
@ForeverPie
As much as I'd love to, I generally don't do the same plane more than once or twice. I'm sure you can find a better version somewhere elsewhere. @AstonMartin145