Yeah, but I have time now so I’m pretty certain it’ll come out soon. I’m currently touching up the cockpit details and paint, probably do some more testing, review the feedback and then it’ll be ready for release. If all goes well it should be out within a few days.
@TOMJeb117
I’m not sure if its just an android thing but try and max out your graphics so that you can get better screenshots. That’s probably gonna help the most. I’d personally not bother with ‘Electric engines’, waste of time imo. Tagging people is also kinda obnoxious unless they wanted to be tagged.
I think, as someone who has experience with both games, that the main barrier between them is a.) the differences in the build interface and b.) the differences in realism. I think it has been addressed below that there are differences in the two build systems that make it challenging to transition, but you can get used to that after a while. What for me was the actual barrier was the physics, realising I couldn’t just hide wing pieces where I wanted, dealing with a much better and more realistic physics engine so on. These were the actual barriers for me ironically. You’d think it be amazing, and it is, but it’s a steep learning curve, which combined with a much smaller and less diverse community, doesn’t want to make you to move over.
Brilliant challenge ED, glad to take out third in a pool of very good creators. Congrats to Boggy in 2nd and Leehopard for a fabulous and worthy 1st place creation. Hope to participate in the future!
Yeah, lots of room for improvement now that I look back at it. I agree it got a bit repetitive, so I might shorten future vids or try a different shot. Thanks though, I really enjoyed making this, just it took quite some time. @Chancey21
Wouldn’t it be Como estás though, cause your asking how they are right now? If it was como eres wouldn’t that be more like what are you like? @TUNDERTEAM
Thanks @BogdanX for taking the time to test the build, it’s my first time making a ground vehicle so I was bit unsure on the performance, I’ll keep that in mind for next time. Glad you liked it!
SR, cause he has 4yrs of experience under his belt compared to 4months (less probably). It takes experience, time and patience to build something good, which as a byproduct leads to points. There are many good builders out there that build much better than some platinums, and categorising creations based on the users rank would make challenges boring, exclusive and lame.
@ChiyomiAnzai
This is great an all, but part of being recognised is making good builds in the first place. You could polish a piece of crap for ages and it’ll still look like crap.
I don’t believe the F-4E had countermeasures (unless they were retrofitted, if you know there are some please show me). I’ll consider those suggestions for next time though @ThomasRoderick
Yeah, kinda ran dry of ideas for shots though. The ones in my head were either too hard to pull off or too similar to the ones before. Will work on it next time though @ThomasRoderick
I flew it round for a bit, quite a nice build. I see where you’ve encoporated the slow roll when your pitching to simulate that characteristic, but it’s not exactly realistic in the sense that the AoA is actually quite small cause the plane just ends up following the nose. But I guess you gotta sacrifice one thing for another sometimes. @Tessemi
The planes still a WIP, I’m still ironing out a few issues with the flight model. Cannot give a date though. @TOMJeb117
+2As randomusername said, the shape of the plane is probably more important than any details, you wanna focus on that first.
+2There are already many good ones out there, I’m planning on an su-57 actually.
@TOMJeb117
Yeah, but I have time now so I’m pretty certain it’ll come out soon. I’m currently touching up the cockpit details and paint, probably do some more testing, review the feedback and then it’ll be ready for release. If all goes well it should be out within a few days.
@TOMJeb117
Soon, like real soon
@TOMJeb117
I’m not sure if its just an android thing but try and max out your graphics so that you can get better screenshots. That’s probably gonna help the most. I’d personally not bother with ‘Electric engines’, waste of time imo. Tagging people is also kinda obnoxious unless they wanted to be tagged.
+6.... They’ve literally admitted that it was from the linked plane. @TheMitsuboshiBoi
Nah it’s ok, I might start working on it again. @ChisP
Pretty soon, possibly this week
+3@Nerfenthusiast
Check bio, I’ve postponed it for now. Might come back later
@ChisP
I think, as someone who has experience with both games, that the main barrier between them is a.) the differences in the build interface and b.) the differences in realism. I think it has been addressed below that there are differences in the two build systems that make it challenging to transition, but you can get used to that after a while. What for me was the actual barrier was the physics, realising I couldn’t just hide wing pieces where I wanted, dealing with a much better and more realistic physics engine so on. These were the actual barriers for me ironically. You’d think it be amazing, and it is, but it’s a steep learning curve, which combined with a much smaller and less diverse community, doesn’t want to make you to move over.
It’s a whole different community over there
+7Multiplayer... haha
+4Nah no need, but thank you. Look forward to the harrier!
@Destroyerz117
Hey btw @Destroyerz117, I really like the system you have for your ejection seats, is it alright if I use a similar system for my next project?
Nah, that’s pretty much it. It’s the only one that was coded in by the devs.
+2Great job on this one, look forward to future builds!
I was thinking of something like this too, very well implemented though!
Yes they do
@Jim1the1Squid
Just increase the deflection angle of the wing pieces in the back if you wish
@Pilothouston5
Use the trim then, it’ll keep the nose up
@Pilothouston5
Brilliant challenge ED, glad to take out third in a pool of very good creators. Congrats to Boggy in 2nd and Leehopard for a fabulous and worthy 1st place creation. Hope to participate in the future!
Wow, this takes SimplePlanes cinematics to a whole new level! Absolutely brilliant stuff!
Yeah, lots of room for improvement now that I look back at it. I agree it got a bit repetitive, so I might shorten future vids or try a different shot. Thanks though, I really enjoyed making this, just it took quite some time. @Chancey21
+1Wouldn’t it be Como estás though, cause your asking how they are right now? If it was como eres wouldn’t that be more like what are you like? @TUNDERTEAM
+1Thanks, glad you liked it
+1@OmarGArciga
Thanks, glad you liked it
@CRJ900Pilot
Oh yeah, I honestly have no clue where that is now. :/
@QingyuZhou
Thanks man, currently entering into exam period so after thats over it should be finalised and done by the end of June?@BlobfishMaster
Thanks @BogdanX for taking the time to test the build, it’s my first time making a ground vehicle so I was bit unsure on the performance, I’ll keep that in mind for next time. Glad you liked it!
+1See comments below
+1@Robbo36mailman
Thanks, glad you liked it. Hopefully some of your new maps might make for better scenery
+2@DuckMint
SR, cause he has 4yrs of experience under his belt compared to 4months (less probably). It takes experience, time and patience to build something good, which as a byproduct leads to points. There are many good builders out there that build much better than some platinums, and categorising creations based on the users rank would make challenges boring, exclusive and lame.
@ChiyomiAnzai
Perhaps, but that’s part of the challenge, beating someone who’s a higher rank than you. It should only motivate you to build better. @ChiyomiAnzai
I’ve seen silver users build far better than some platinums consistently. Ranks don’t matter at all, experience and effort does.
+2@ChiyomiAnzai
Some of those landscape shots look pretty nice, lots of potential
Use structural wings that have edited XML code to enable control surfaces (found in many top user planes)
Sorry bout that haha, still need to work on sound and audio mixing and balancing
@Culydeath
I know, I wasn’t aiming for 100% realism in this vid.
+1@Shootingstar07
I don’t think it’s from Chappie...
@ChickenMcNuggets007
This is great an all, but part of being recognised is making good builds in the first place. You could polish a piece of crap for ages and it’ll still look like crap.
+2Yeah, countermeasures were part of a series of upgrades later on. @Nerfenthusiast
The blueprints need to be in your photos folder within your personal user folder @Zoomzoom999
Dunno, depends how I feel and my schedule. Maybe another month or two
@JamesBleriot
I don’t believe the F-4E had countermeasures (unless they were retrofitted, if you know there are some please show me). I’ll consider those suggestions for next time though @ThomasRoderick
+3Yeah, kinda ran dry of ideas for shots though. The ones in my head were either too hard to pull off or too similar to the ones before. Will work on it next time though @ThomasRoderick
+1Haha, thanks dude. It’s still got a long way to go though but glad you like it.
+1@EliteArsenals24
Thanks man, glad you liked it
@HarryBen47
I flew it round for a bit, quite a nice build. I see where you’ve encoporated the slow roll when your pitching to simulate that characteristic, but it’s not exactly realistic in the sense that the AoA is actually quite small cause the plane just ends up following the nose. But I guess you gotta sacrifice one thing for another sometimes. @Tessemi
+1Haha, red’s a bit over the top
@Lahoski107