I would argue that being mad because someone changed ur online, virtual build is just as egocentric. Like please, someone’s trying to have a little fun, going completely bananas like a baby is unwarranted. @Aeromen
Just reverse engineer it. Take apart sections you like and see how it’s made. My plane isn’t exactly perfect so you could definitely improve it. @Shootingstar07
What if there’s an emergency and the plane begins leaking fuel? If you just had enough fuel to make it there you’d crash. Better safe than sorry. @randomusername
Man, a lot of these are not issues. Just did a quick test for some of them. No 2 works pretty sure, no 6 there’s a button bottom right (resizes screen), no. 7 is present, no. 8 just go to quality settings and turn it off (under predictor). Cannot test the other ones. Also tonnes of stuff on XML, just do a quick search and look up simple cheats (I can link if you want).
Did you try using LandingGear input, everything else is working as intended but that input is a bit strange.
E.g.
1.) Input: LandingGear
2.) Input: LandingGear + 0
Results in different behaviour I believe
@WNP78
Yeah adding to what Bogdan said, lovely cockpit work, but for a plane like your collab one, a more suitable cockpit store would be from the 50-70’s, more analogue stuff. What you’ve got is low key f-16, a slight disparity.
For the wings are you using hard edged panels? If not you should try using thin circular edged and panel it similar to how you panelled the fuselage. Should get rid of hard reflection boundaries,
If you run the main version it’ll probably run worse cause of the number of rotators in the nozzles, try the mobile version or remove the engine nozzles
@Nerfenthusiast
I’m pretty sure they do? They’ve been designed to increase wing area and drag, reducing stall speed? Maybe the effect isn’t noticeable enough... @BogdanX
Well RU is gone now, for better or for worse. So you can all stop talking about it now.
+6We don’t need another post about this stupid drama. It be better if you didn’t make this post. No need add more fuel to the fire.
+10I would argue that being mad because someone changed ur online, virtual build is just as egocentric. Like please, someone’s trying to have a little fun, going completely bananas like a baby is unwarranted. @Aeromen
+8Andrew said he was considering adding a delta(x) function, so certainly a possibility in very near future
That section is tricky, but you could possibly make it better if you panelled it differently. @Shootingstar07
+1Just reverse engineer it. Take apart sections you like and see how it’s made. My plane isn’t exactly perfect so you could definitely improve it. @Shootingstar07
+1What if there’s an emergency and the plane begins leaking fuel? If you just had enough fuel to make it there you’d crash. Better safe than sorry. @randomusername
Wow that’s looking really good!
https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vTCfs-yqNlHkz26WuTzx8RQ2LV3JrX8EPB5czzAHrDDfEcvlsBYf7k2V5sm2q-sANGi9rx1omgeH8Qi/pub
@CRJ900Pilot
Man, a lot of these are not issues. Just did a quick test for some of them. No 2 works pretty sure, no 6 there’s a button bottom right (resizes screen), no. 7 is present, no. 8 just go to quality settings and turn it off (under predictor). Cannot test the other ones. Also tonnes of stuff on XML, just do a quick search and look up simple cheats (I can link if you want).
+1Yeah there’s no way of tracking other crafts, so pretty obvious no.
Currently making an F-16c, maybe later?
@Schiefensnarglez
Try:
+1abs(pitch)
@Type2volkswagen
Nah, for me anyways, some functions don’t work if I don’t put spaces between the subtraction/addition signs
@vcharng
Maybe try this?
clamp(Yaw,0,1) (rightside)
clamp(Yaw,-1,0) (leftside)
@Type2volkswagen
+1Did you try using LandingGear input, everything else is working as intended but that input is a bit strange.
E.g.
1.) Input: LandingGear
2.) Input: LandingGear + 0
Results in different behaviour I believe
@WNP78
Out of interest, do the (v< or v>) values work within these functions?
+1Wow, I’m stoked! Absolutely gonna go to town with cockpits and accurate flight controls for my new F-16! Very excited!
Yeah it did, but then you realised and deleted it. I got a notification letting me know that.
@Fastwaffle233
It’s a copy of mine
+1@DaDerpachu123
Not cool bro... not cool...
+1Sure, ill take a look@Brields95
Yep, F-4E’s have longer noses than the other models. It’s a pretty decent blueprint match.
@Hedero
Check description, though it’s around 900 parts
@hRmm
Anything changed?
Yeah adding to what Bogdan said, lovely cockpit work, but for a plane like your collab one, a more suitable cockpit store would be from the 50-70’s, more analogue stuff. What you’ve got is low key f-16, a slight disparity.
+1For the wings are you using hard edged panels? If not you should try using thin circular edged and panel it similar to how you panelled the fuselage. Should get rid of hard reflection boundaries,
+1Ah so that’s why you waited all this time lol
@EternalDarkness
Well it isn’t designed to be freindly...
@Nerfenthusiast
Yeah I will, will probably take a long time though so we’ll see
+1@F4f879
Well that plane didn’t fly if I recall. Flying will make it lag more than if it were just stationary. @Nerfenthusiast
Check the profile pic, will be quite a project
@F4f879
I cannot thank you enough for the amount of help you gave with this build, but thanks to you it turned out really nice! @ChiChiWerx
Oh lol, most Vietnam era missiles were pretty trash anyways
+1@EngineerOtaku
Shhhhh, the Aim-7’s aren’t just stock interceptors @EngineerOtaku
+1Haha, glad you think so!
@AWESOMENESS360
If you run the main version it’ll probably run worse cause of the number of rotators in the nozzles, try the mobile version or remove the engine nozzles
@Nerfenthusiast
Hopefully my next project will be even more stunning ;)
@F4f879
Oh I don’t know about that, I’ll see but I cannot make any promises
@TOMJeb117
Check the mobile version, only 910 parts
@Tank6376
Yeah take what you need, completely fine with me
@CRJ900Pilot
I guess stacking a bunch of engines might produce the right sound lol
@RYAviation
Thanks @BoganBoganTheMan for the spotlight
Thanks for the spotlight
+1@Chancey21
I’m pretty sure they do? They’ve been designed to increase wing area and drag, reducing stall speed? Maybe the effect isn’t noticeable enough... @BogdanX
Try now
@ProcessedPlAnEs
Whoops, must have left that in by accident, lemme change it real quick
@ProcessedPlAnEs
Haha, long time coming
@Noname918181
Yeah, the mobiles versions up
@ProcessedPlAnEs
Link to plane: Here
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/k4L9Rf/McDonnell-Douglas-F-4E-Phantom-II