@unCANNY I cant take off or turn it though. And there is a problem with the engines you should be able to hold a 10 degree climb and the speed not drop. Youve got some things to work on in terms of flight models but on everything else it seems good.
Wow what a great nuclear tipped ICBM. I think it’s a terrible box. Clearly this was supposed to be a nuke I’m very disappointed in the lack of realism and the handling is just awful it won’t even move!
Oh I saw the high drag points and I saw you saying it was hurting your device so I assumed you didn’t lol. Yeah I really like the details you put in here. Is it based on anything?@FelixHCSX
Your laptop is lagging because of mass drag. When you build a ship you need to make sure calculateDrag is false not dragScale 0 on all parts except one. On that one part you can put drag scale up to whatever you want it to make your ship slow down the way you want it to
@WIZARD2017 hey, I'm trying to make a target indicator on the map for an SPG but I don't really know how you made this, and I don't want to screw anything up. Basically, I want to remove the auto-zoom so it stays at the view where you can see everything, and then I want to add crosshairs on there to line up where the shell will hit so you don't have to use sighting rounds. I have a pretty good idea how to do the crosshairs but I want to know if it is safe to scale, how all the pistons inside there work, and whats ok to change.
With 313 parts you could have made this with custom control surfaces. I really like it but I think it would really improve your builds to do this while still remaining mobile friendly. Most stuff under 500 parts is mobile friendly
ok so it definately needs more AOA. Its pretty close to an f-16 where you fell like you are almost skating on the air because when you turn there is a high AOA. When slamming down the keys i should see anywhere from 10-15 degrees AOA or sometimes more. other than that it looks and performs very well. Glad you made this, however, you should have asked me for a loadout because i gladly would have made one :(
Yeah, so you can use the smooth function or the damperMulitplier on the rotators to blend the input together and it makes a more gradual approach towards you maximum value. Smooth only lets the rotator move as much per second as you allow it to. Both of the could fix this problem
I really like this model the flight model is great but with 1 and 2 of the plane bounces a lot this is due to the AOA constantly readjusting. I believe you can fix it with turning up the damperMulitplier
Trainer Jet- The most underrated build type
ex: My trainer jet has only 39 upvotes and took me three months to finish because the flight model is pretty much exact and so is the entire airframe.
If you watch the movie you see a shot maybe about 2 or 3 seconds long with the t-38 it does kinda look like the F-5F but the nose is rounded. T-38s were used in dissimilar combat training so them being able to acquire it through the navy is quite probable. @EngineerOtaku
I like the flight model and overall design quite a lot. However, the cockpit feels a lot narrower than I’m used to and the loadout is off. Those bombs don’t look like Mk.82s and conventional napalm hasn’t been used since the 60s or 70s. Also, the mk.82 can only be put on the interior 3 pylons on each side. Other than that it’s good
@rexzion Its an SPG mounted on a HEMTT type chasis
@unCANNY I cant take off or turn it though. And there is a problem with the engines you should be able to hold a 10 degree climb and the speed not drop. Youve got some things to work on in terms of flight models but on everything else it seems good.
@rexzion bruh im not gonna tell you lol its a suprise
Its awesome except for that it has no pitch authority
Hmmm looks a bit too wide but that could just be the angle looks really good other than that @Hedero
Is this the 2000?
Hmm the cockpit looks odd to me but I could be wrong
+1Man this isn’t good y’all are Lyon. 😂 jk looks real nice 👌🏻
That line is from the simpsons smh@Hedero
Very nice ft you probably didn’t have to panel the whole thing but you did a nice job. I hope you finish it sometime!
+1Nobody:...
Me: Excellent Smithers
Lmao I can’t even make a plane this good apparently. This has more upvotes than 75%of my stuff@rexzion
Wow what a great nuclear tipped ICBM. I think it’s a terrible box. Clearly this was supposed to be a nuke I’m very disappointed in the lack of realism and the handling is just awful it won’t even move!
Nice @FelixHCSX
Oh I saw the high drag points and I saw you saying it was hurting your device so I assumed you didn’t lol. Yeah I really like the details you put in here. Is it based on anything?@FelixHCSX
Rlly good job tho!
Your laptop is lagging because of mass drag. When you build a ship you need to make sure calculateDrag is false not dragScale 0 on all parts except one. On that one part you can put drag scale up to whatever you want it to make your ship slow down the way you want it to
Nice man! Looking forward to it!@CoolPeach
Thanks!@WIZARD2017
@NexusGaming or i might have accidentaly put 104 instead of 105
@NexusGaming 10*4=40 dispensed submunitions + 10 canisters that the bomblets came out of=50 i guess 52 if you count the bomb case and the bomb itself
@WIZARD2017 hey, I'm trying to make a target indicator on the map for an SPG but I don't really know how you made this, and I don't want to screw anything up. Basically, I want to remove the auto-zoom so it stays at the view where you can see everything, and then I want to add crosshairs on there to line up where the shell will hit so you don't have to use sighting rounds. I have a pretty good idea how to do the crosshairs but I want to know if it is safe to scale, how all the pistons inside there work, and whats ok to change.
Wow. Nice AK
great job as always
Cool concept, USAFs loyal wingman + USN unmanned frigate
man you made a monster, great job!
loophole: if I use two i dont have to credit lmao
+1Yay new plane! @Dimkal
That would take way too much time and probably end up slowing the game down @Wallaby
With 313 parts you could have made this with custom control surfaces. I really like it but I think it would really improve your builds to do this while still remaining mobile friendly. Most stuff under 500 parts is mobile friendly
+3@SavageMan awesome might add some cool weapons
@SavageMan yeah sometimes ill get super high AOA and other times not so ig its fine. I gotta figure out how to increase AOA in this game...
ok so it definately needs more AOA. Its pretty close to an f-16 where you fell like you are almost skating on the air because when you turn there is a high AOA. When slamming down the keys i should see anywhere from 10-15 degrees AOA or sometimes more. other than that it looks and performs very well. Glad you made this, however, you should have asked me for a loadout because i gladly would have made one :(
F-18? Ill be the judge of that!
oh no not THE meme plane
Yeah you can still try the damper might help. You’ll want to keep moving it up in multiples of 10 don’t be surprised if it hits 5000-10000 @GuyFolk
I mean if you know how to use PID controllers you can use those@GuyFolk
Yeah, so you can use the smooth function or the damperMulitplier on the rotators to blend the input together and it makes a more gradual approach towards you maximum value. Smooth only lets the rotator move as much per second as you allow it to. Both of the could fix this problem
I really like this model the flight model is great but with 1 and 2 of the plane bounces a lot this is due to the AOA constantly readjusting. I believe you can fix it with turning up the damperMulitplier
I think @rexzion was being sarcastic@MrKoT
+2This best not have a combined gear like the littoral combat ships...
Nice
Type 054 +zumwalt
Lol ur me in terms of finishing projects 😂
Also, do the strikes stay on our account permanently?
although I could have a strike from tully a while ago...
Yeah, stupid mods, I'm going to openly criticize you and act like a macho man. You work for me! lol @EternalDarkness
Trainer Jet- The most underrated build type
ex: My trainer jet has only 39 upvotes and took me three months to finish because the flight model is pretty much exact and so is the entire airframe.
If you watch the movie you see a shot maybe about 2 or 3 seconds long with the t-38 it does kinda look like the F-5F but the nose is rounded. T-38s were used in dissimilar combat training so them being able to acquire it through the navy is quite probable. @EngineerOtaku
I like the flight model and overall design quite a lot. However, the cockpit feels a lot narrower than I’m used to and the loadout is off. Those bombs don’t look like Mk.82s and conventional napalm hasn’t been used since the 60s or 70s. Also, the mk.82 can only be put on the interior 3 pylons on each side. Other than that it’s good