@otayahiromo8211 @GhostHTX is not criticizing your description, he really likes your build, as do I! Nice build, flies delightfully well and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Defiant here before, well done!
Well, I generally like it, I especially like the creativity and precision when it comes to the ailerons, the work on the rudder and the landing gear. I do have several inputs, if you'll humor me: Doesn't need near unlimited fuel, or the negative empty weight, really. Also, the trim and flaps being interconnected. You might want to stack two rotators on top of each other, one set to pitch, the other to trim. Other than those two gripes, this is great fun to fly. I also have to admit the Scooter is one of my favorite airplanes.
@Chancey21 really...the placement is perfect. Did you use math and figure out the numbers beforehand? I’m asking because I need to do something similar for a build I’m working on and I’d like it to look finished, which I’ve not been able to do.
Beautiful representation of a unique plane. You’re getting better with each build. This one still accelerates fairly swiftly, but overall, it handles fairly well and is very enjoyable to fly.
Huh, this works, definitely could see the red lights when I was low on the glide path at night, if on a mobile, it’s a little hard to see unless you’re fairly close, but that’s no fault of your own. Definitely can sort of make night approaches to the carrier now.
Interesting...not too many votes for the Mustang...or the Spitfire...seems to be overwhelmingly be the Eagle. A few others thrown into the mix (Flanker, Buffalo, P-47, Me-109, Eindecker) for good measure. Did the Eagle end Air to air combat as we’ve known it? Have the Eagle’s opponents thrown in the towel and decided they can’t win? I maintain no, at least not yet, the Chinese and Russians clearly have a capability to meet the Eagle on favorable terms. Thoughts?
@TheDepressedPig nice take on the subject...I agree the Thunderbolt is worthy of consideration, especially since USAAF fighter pilots turned its disadvantages (weight, turning capability) as a fighter into advantages (flew it higher, above 30,000’, then dove against other fighters in high speed one pass diving attacks...nothing could match the Thunderbolt in a dive) through smart tactics. If the Thunderbolt is the greatest fighter, then should we consider the Strike Eagle the ultimate incarnation of the F-15?
This isn't perfect, but it's very good, especially for someone with 1,800 points. I would have kept the flaps on VTOL controls and the trim on the slider, but it flies pretty well and the shape is spot on. If I were you, I would also consider a re-release of this build at some point later one, but with custom gear, more markings and "disableMesh=true" on the rotators. Nice work.
Well, the feathering mechanism really works...?!? Just as it does in RL...which was completely unexpected to me as SP isn’t really RL with real air loads working on actual control surfaces, just computer based approximations as to how those surfaces might react in the air. So, when the feathered plane fell straight down at around 250 mph, I was surprised, to say the least!
@AceMcCloud thanks. This is an older build, so there are some autoroll issues, it’s undersized and also really difficult to take off and land. I’ve considered rebuilding a new Scooter because it’s one of my favorite jets of all time.
Tested this thing in all flight regimes...it actually turns quite well above 20,000’ and 600+ mph. The only problem is the tendency to overshoot your target as you can’t throttle back! This thing would have made a great one pass, shoot and haul a** point defense interceptor against bombers, but would have been dead meat against a MiG-15 or similar. Nice job in that your replication of this concept actually taught me a thing or two about rocket-powered fighters, thanks!
@Mustang51 hmmm...your perspective on weight is interesting. My experience is that weights are fairly accurate and only a limited amount weight tweaks are required to nail actual weight; including fuel. SP’s weight calculation is fairly rudimentary, there’s really no allowance for hollow or solid, for a 1x1x1 basic block, the weight is 22 lbs, the index says a basic 2x2x2 cylindrical resizable fuse should be 11 lbs, but it’s not, it’s more like 222 lbs. Also, the weight changes with size, which is cool. Anyway, I’ve found it fairly accurate, so am wondering what’s different about your builds. Are you stacking blocks inside one another? If so, that would essentially double the weight of that section...🤔
@Mustang51 thanks. Your planes are pretty good as well. I have upvoted then in the past...but now I’m also following. Now, if I can convince you to discontinue the unlimited fuel trick...😉
@Mustang51 interesting find from 2.6 years ago...hmmm, how do I feel now? Good question. Well, I think I actually care about comments more, though upvotes are appreciation for a builder’s efforts. I try and make a comment on every upvote I give because that’s the true measure that the player took the time to take a look and perhaps didn’t simply give an upvote based on a glance at the screenshot. Also, now that I have more points, I can Spotlight many more creations, which I do if the plane is very good. I like doing that and giving a word of encouragement to newer builders. Another thing to realize is a high number of followers usually results in more Upvotes...more people see your creation, more have the opportunity to upvote. So, don’t believe your hype, especially if you have many followers.
@otayahiromo8211 @GhostHTX is not criticizing your description, he really likes your build, as do I! Nice build, flies delightfully well and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Defiant here before, well done!
Well, I generally like it, I especially like the creativity and precision when it comes to the ailerons, the work on the rudder and the landing gear. I do have several inputs, if you'll humor me: Doesn't need near unlimited fuel, or the negative empty weight, really. Also, the trim and flaps being interconnected. You might want to stack two rotators on top of each other, one set to pitch, the other to trim. Other than those two gripes, this is great fun to fly. I also have to admit the Scooter is one of my favorite airplanes.
@Chancey21 wow, that’s some eye for precision you have there! Nice!
@Chancey21 really...the placement is perfect. Did you use math and figure out the numbers beforehand? I’m asking because I need to do something similar for a build I’m working on and I’d like it to look finished, which I’ve not been able to do.
Geez, such hostility...anyhow, how did you place those sections together so precisely? Did you use scripts?
For the Motherland!
A bit tail heavy and pitch happy, but a nice effort nonetheless.
Beautiful representation of a unique plane. You’re getting better with each build. This one still accelerates fairly swiftly, but overall, it handles fairly well and is very enjoyable to fly.
Gorgeous Boeing. And, it actually flies well! (I actually had 3 props strike the runway on landing, but, shhh!)
Interesting build. You can XML mod. Next time, you might try to increase the prop engine’s power and get rid of the jet.
I like it!
Huh, this works, definitely could see the red lights when I was low on the glide path at night, if on a mobile, it’s a little hard to see unless you’re fairly close, but that’s no fault of your own. Definitely can sort of make night approaches to the carrier now.
Wow, makes my eyeballs bleed and would instantly crush it’s pilot to death!
@Djorg708 interesting choice and way of looking at the question; you are correct, though, the F-18 does many things well.
Fun!
This is amazing, really great work!
@BurkeEnterprise that’s probably my next question. But not yet.
Interesting...not too many votes for the Mustang...or the Spitfire...seems to be overwhelmingly be the Eagle. A few others thrown into the mix (Flanker, Buffalo, P-47, Me-109, Eindecker) for good measure. Did the Eagle end Air to air combat as we’ve known it? Have the Eagle’s opponents thrown in the towel and decided they can’t win? I maintain no, at least not yet, the Chinese and Russians clearly have a capability to meet the Eagle on favorable terms. Thoughts?
@TheDepressedPig nice take on the subject...I agree the Thunderbolt is worthy of consideration, especially since USAAF fighter pilots turned its disadvantages (weight, turning capability) as a fighter into advantages (flew it higher, above 30,000’, then dove against other fighters in high speed one pass diving attacks...nothing could match the Thunderbolt in a dive) through smart tactics. If the Thunderbolt is the greatest fighter, then should we consider the Strike Eagle the ultimate incarnation of the F-15?
@AdlerSteiner Ha! Yeah, I’ll go with the ‘109
@Nerfenthusiast not sure what you mean..? Do you mean the F-22’s only advantage is that it has a better radar than the Eagle?
Not bad...welcome to the site!
@Tully2001 wait...you’re a Mod now...? When did that happen and how did I miss that???
Yes, I did mean in RL...I suppose I could post another question asking “what’s the greatest SP creation of all time?” But for now, IRL.
This isn't perfect, but it's very good, especially for someone with 1,800 points. I would have kept the flaps on VTOL controls and the trim on the slider, but it flies pretty well and the shape is spot on. If I were you, I would also consider a re-release of this build at some point later one, but with custom gear, more markings and "disableMesh=true" on the rotators. Nice work.
Well, the feathering mechanism really works...?!? Just as it does in RL...which was completely unexpected to me as SP isn’t really RL with real air loads working on actual control surfaces, just computer based approximations as to how those surfaces might react in the air. So, when the feathered plane fell straight down at around 250 mph, I was surprised, to say the least!
@AceMcCloud thanks. This is an older build, so there are some autoroll issues, it’s undersized and also really difficult to take off and land. I’ve considered rebuilding a new Scooter because it’s one of my favorite jets of all time.
Nice. Some nice details that accurately capture the look and proportions of the Viper, without jarring items that are incorrect.
Tested this thing in all flight regimes...it actually turns quite well above 20,000’ and 600+ mph. The only problem is the tendency to overshoot your target as you can’t throttle back! This thing would have made a great one pass, shoot and haul a** point defense interceptor against bombers, but would have been dead meat against a MiG-15 or similar. Nice job in that your replication of this concept actually taught me a thing or two about rocket-powered fighters, thanks!
The 11.2 lbs/sq ft wing loading is a bit much, but this is a superior build, congrats and welcome to SP!
British Airways has the coolest radio callsign ever, IMHO...”Speedbird” followed by the flight number!
Very cool. I like it lot!
This build, as with all your builds, is the epitome of of excellence. Accurate shape, cool features and it even flies quite nicely!
Interesting build. The F-100 is one of my favorite builds.
@Mustang51 I see you’re on iOS as well, on other platforms you could mod the weight as well.
@Mustang51 hmmm...your perspective on weight is interesting. My experience is that weights are fairly accurate and only a limited amount weight tweaks are required to nail actual weight; including fuel. SP’s weight calculation is fairly rudimentary, there’s really no allowance for hollow or solid, for a 1x1x1 basic block, the weight is 22 lbs, the index says a basic 2x2x2 cylindrical resizable fuse should be 11 lbs, but it’s not, it’s more like 222 lbs. Also, the weight changes with size, which is cool. Anyway, I’ve found it fairly accurate, so am wondering what’s different about your builds. Are you stacking blocks inside one another? If so, that would essentially double the weight of that section...🤔
@Mustang51 thanks. Your planes are pretty good as well. I have upvoted then in the past...but now I’m also following. Now, if I can convince you to discontinue the unlimited fuel trick...😉
@Mustang51 interesting find from 2.6 years ago...hmmm, how do I feel now? Good question. Well, I think I actually care about comments more, though upvotes are appreciation for a builder’s efforts. I try and make a comment on every upvote I give because that’s the true measure that the player took the time to take a look and perhaps didn’t simply give an upvote based on a glance at the screenshot. Also, now that I have more points, I can Spotlight many more creations, which I do if the plane is very good. I like doing that and giving a word of encouragement to newer builders. Another thing to realize is a high number of followers usually results in more Upvotes...more people see your creation, more have the opportunity to upvote. So, don’t believe your hype, especially if you have many followers.
This is an interesting beast, the engines take a really long time to develop thrust. Makes it challenging to land on the carrier, but it can be done!
Niiice!!!
Nice representation of an underrepresented build!
Interesting build, as you said, very hard to fly.
Excellent build, well executed and plausible! 😃👍
If you do a Cold War jet shootout, I have a few builds you might enjoy...
@F104Deathtrap well, I can’t because the radius decreases from one end to the other, so it’s a fairly complex shape.
Mirage F1 Intake @SledDriver. What I would like to do would be to form an intake using individual fuse panels arranged in a semi circle.
Nice work.
@SledDriver? Any tips?
I especially like the creative camo work, looks very good.
@AircraftoftheRedStar are you iOS only? The best way of building up wings without sacrificing performance is drag modding—but it can be done.