@TheMikolorian oh great (^^)
|
You can use this clamp01(3 * sin(smooth(LandingGear,0.14) * 180)) as the imput to make the bay door to close after the LandingGear is out or when it closes
|
And for the part of the door that stays on the LandingGear. You can cut the Fuselagetill you get a bay and door that is from the same Fuselage and attach it to the LandingGear. It won't work on the first time but after some test it will be great
|
And for the LandingGear. You can make the Imput to LandingGear
|
Hope this helps. If my advice isn't clear. Feel free to ask me to clarify myself. And if you need any kind of help even physically help on your builds. Feel free ask right away (^^) I'd love to help
This may be due to the parts got connected to each other.
You can go to wall plug button thingy. click it then press disconnect all then reattach them manually not with auto connect
|
If you ever needed any help in the future. Feel free to ask me directly (^^)
@TheCommentaryGuy @nwa yeah that's right
@killyridols some people may find it offensive and also the family of people who were injured. They might see it as a joke or that someone is playing with their lose
@nwa I'm glad you'd help me. Thank you (^^). Btw if I'd ever wanted to build it. I will make a new one from scratch since my A-50 model is overly outdated
Bro literally rewrote the rules. But this one crystal clear. (^^)
|
Will as of the credits thing. If I've ever needed help on something. I will give credits for it but there are some tricks and funky trees that I forgot or don't know who made them. Such as letting the rotor work as landing gear. That I'd the most used funky trees in my account. But yet I don't know who to credit....
@ComradeBazookaBall everyone indeed like blowing thing up (^^) but the only type of Airliners that are unique are the 40s to 60s. I mean oh!! my god just look at this beauty. It truly amazing and also my favorite Airliner. And you know what made it unique?.... because it was based on the platform of a Bomber. Not pure Airliner
@ComradeBazookaBall as of my understanding. It maybe because Airliners are just less appealing for people. Amd everyone one like sharp unique planes. But Airliners.... its impossible to make a unique one it just follows the general geometry of every Airliner. and same goes for Buses and SuperCars everyone follow there interests but the default also comes to the sharper and faster.
@Graingy most of my builds are based on low physics and that doesn't make much lag and much difference at the same time for me. And also as long as it can run WTM then I'm fine with it (^^)
Cyber truck 2.0 (^^)=b
+1@TheMikolorian if you don't mind. You can give me a tag on an unlisted post so I can assist you further. But it's up to you (^^)
+1@TheMikolorian oh great (^^)
|
You can use this
clamp01(3 * sin(smooth(LandingGear,0.14) * 180))as the imput to make the bay door to close after theLandingGearis out or when it closes|
And for the part of the door that stays on the LandingGear. You can cut the
Fuselagetill you get abayanddoorthat is from the same Fuselage and attach it to theLandingGear. It won't work on the first time but after some test it will be great|
And for the LandingGear. You can make the Imput to
LandingGear|
Hope this helps. If my advice isn't clear. Feel free to ask me to clarify myself. And if you need any kind of help even physically help on your builds. Feel free ask right away (^^) I'd love to help
@DoctorNowhere oh speaking of among us. I never ones considered playing. I don't know how it works...( ;^^)
@DoctorNowhere oh speaking of among us. I never ones considered playing. I don't know how it works...( ;^^)
If you're cooked then we're dead. Cuz if the Doctor himself got sick who will look over our health?
+1|
But hopefully everything goes well (^^)
Congrats my friend (^^)/. Keep going and platinum will be in your hand soon
I'm help (^^). What exactly would you like me to help you on?
+1The flying pancake (^^)=b
@Nevermore there is nothing to apologise for.... its fine and it runs great by my current standards (^^)
(^-^;)
+1Take your time my friend. Hopefully we'll see you soon (^^)/
@SimplyElegant haven't set a new project yet ( ^^;). But we'll see
+1@Kav thanks my friend (^^)
+1You can reduce the
drag scalefrom the XMLThis is what I do to allow it to cut through air perfectly
@chuechhuhong I had a lot of chances to make it more realistic but it already lags my phone so I said let's just not make it any more laggy
Here is my SU-25-SM3. It has a cockpit but not so realistic
>>click here if you want to<<
This may be due to the parts got connected to each other.
+2You can go to
wall plug button thingy. click it then pressdisconnect allthen reattach themmanuallynot withauto connect|
If you ever needed any help in the future. Feel free to ask me directly (^^)
What's the best
set upfor it?Yoooo glad to see you here again (^^)/. You had me so worried about ya my friend (；＞＜)
@TheCommentaryGuy @nwa yeah that's right
+1@killyridols some people may find it offensive and also the family of people who were injured. They might see it as a joke or that someone is playing with their lose
Yooo we missed you bro (^^)/
The paws hands part reminded me of Lando trying to say privileges in the press conference....
@IQinventory thanks mate (^^)
+1No way bro used the chassis of the FV4005
+1I like it (^^)=b
@nwa (^^)=b
+1@nwa I'm glad you'd help me. Thank you (^^). Btw if I'd ever wanted to build it. I will make a new one from scratch since my A-50 model is overly outdated
+1May I ask. What's the best reliable set up for this site if its what you're using... or if that it even works on mobile
@nwa maybe when I'll be free?.... I don't know what was I thinking when I did the A-50 not the Il-76
+1@Cuboidable yeah it's me. Thank you very much (^^)
@avDude4 you're always welcome my friend (^^)/
@avDude4 oh..... I understood.... mine is 2021. But hopefully you'll get a better one soon. (^^)
I'm not here to show or anything my friend. But it's a great coincidence that I reach 200 the day before (^^)
I'm glad who ever was saying that got shot.... its creepy (；＞＜)
+3@avDude4 how?. on my potato 4gb ram phone it works fine....
@avDude4 btw. We finally got jets in WTM including me262 and kikka and much more
@avDude4 same goes for bothering SU-9...
@avDude4 at least I didn't thought it was a kikka...
Bro literally rewrote the rules. But this one crystal clear. (^^)
+5|
Will as of the credits thing. If I've ever needed help on something. I will give credits for it but there are some tricks and funky trees that I forgot or don't know who made them. Such as letting the rotor work as landing gear. That I'd the most used funky trees in my account. But yet I don't know who to credit....
I thought it was a 262 (;^^)
Yay glad to hear that my friend (^^)/
Truck (^^)=b
@ComradeBazookaBall everyone indeed like blowing thing up (^^) but the only type of Airliners that are unique are the 40s to 60s. I mean oh!! my god just look at this beauty. It truly amazing and also my favorite Airliner. And you know what made it unique?.... because it was based on the platform of a Bomber. Not pure Airliner
Soviet offroader (^^)=b great job my friend
+1@ComradeBazookaBall as of my understanding. It maybe because Airliners are just less appealing for people. Amd everyone one like sharp unique planes. But Airliners.... its impossible to make a unique one it just follows the general geometry of every Airliner. and same goes for Buses and SuperCars everyone follow there interests but the default also comes to the sharper and faster.
@SC403 you're welcome my friend (^^)
@Graingy nah. It's a phone
@Graingy most of my builds are based on low physics and that doesn't make much lag and much difference at the same time for me. And also as long as it can run WTM then I'm fine with it (^^)
@Graingy I manage (^^)
@YokaiBear thank you my friend (^^) you too