@Krikkit42
Fly a Mirage on DCS or War Thunder and compare it to this one... I know that these are not models of realism, but they are still closer to reality than this one.
I'm not criticizing his work badly, the plane itself is magnificent, I'm just saying that it flies badly compared to the original, I know this plane is dedicated to mouse and joystick, but I can't stand the kind of bumps when I'm handling it, this is due to a bad spacing between the wings and the elevators, or to a bad distribution of the masses...
Mouais...
A part l'auto-aim, l'utilisation du Funky est inexistante.
T'aurais du le rendre contrôlable, tout en conservant l'auto-aim.
Le tank en lui même est assez bien construit (mis à part le canon qui a le calibre d'une carabine à plombs), c'est assez dommage.
@Bluepink @BogdanX
Okay, better stop the debate there, I just wanted to say what I thought of this plane.
But that may not be the place.
Still, it's very well done, it's the best F35 on the site!
@Bluepink, @BogdanX
This plane sells well just because it's American. By purchasing this aircraft, countries benefit from American "protection".
The only positive point of this plane is its lower RCS, but it is also not invisible to the eye of a good AESA, it is not an F22..
So, in air-to-air combat, its only advantage will be in BVR, but frankly, in a medium-close range fight, for example, between a Gripen and an F35, I'd rather be in the Gripen than in the F35...
For me, this plane is a failure, adopting new technologies, but still a failure.
With all these billions, we could have produced something other than this dung, which in 20 years will no longer have any advantage over any type of modern aircraft.
You also have to think in the long term, because the life of a fighter aircraft is not just 20 years, but rather 30 or even 40 years, while undergoing improvements during its operational life.
So you need a good base, and the F35 is not a good base.
I also don't like to talk about these stories of generations..
I can't tell the difference between 5th and 4th+ or that sort of thing.
For me, the RCS does not determine the generation, the Rafale is the same age as the F22, and yet, they are not classified in the same generation... This generation story would not be slightly modified by the American propaganda in order to sell better ?
Nice plane.
Looks a bit like YF23 and Dassault's NGF.
But with such small air intakes, and such a design, I don't see how this plane could go to Mach4..
This plane, given its look, would not exceed Mach 2.3...
For the altitude, ramjets would not even be enough to reach it, it would also require rocket engines.. and your plane got normal reactors..
In short, this aircraft would have at the maximum the performance of an F22.
The positive points :
- it is quite well made
- it has an original livery
- Custom armaments are fine.
- Part count is reasonable.
The negative points :
- the HUD is not finished
- it is too slow (An SMB2 is literally faster)
- And on the roll/elevator control surfaces of the wing, there is a sign "non step" in English, but you mistranslated it, normally it should have said "Ne pas marcher".
Otherwise, it's one of the best Rafale on the site, well done !
Good Haunebu !
There are many similarities with my IIB (and also my III), the portholes are however of a different model, (mine are small armored holes), the interior is very successful.
Only criticism (because I always have to make one), the turret is not auto-aim.
But it does not matter, the whole is successful, and it is a good Haunebu !
I don't know too..
?
?
?
??
???
Aérospatiale* Alouette III
+1Otherwise, nice build, but Vulcans have no place on this helicopter.
If I understand correctly, this is your first plane ?
+1Tremendous.
Well, strange thing.
+1Congrats for gold !
@TheCommentaryGuy Haha
Finish it. Please.
T
Make a crashed F35 now.
@GrizzlitnCFSP Merci !
+2AVAILABLE HERE : https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Q1nhUJ/Mirage-MD750
@Shimamurahougetsu
+2@AlbertanPlaneMaker
@Bryan5
+1@ImSimon
@IAlsoBuildPlane
@DatRoadTrainGuy19
+2@ReturnOfJeffChandler
@kyomunosekai
@SyntheticL
+1@SPairforce
@Dragoranos
@Krikkit42
+2Fly a Mirage on DCS or War Thunder and compare it to this one... I know that these are not models of realism, but they are still closer to reality than this one.
I'm not criticizing his work badly, the plane itself is magnificent, I'm just saying that it flies badly compared to the original, I know this plane is dedicated to mouse and joystick, but I can't stand the kind of bumps when I'm handling it, this is due to a bad spacing between the wings and the elevators, or to a bad distribution of the masses...
@SyntheticL Yes, a Mirage MD750. Due to the poor quality of my original, I decided to redo it.
+2Damn, this is a nice ship.
+1Once again, this aircraft is beautiful.
+3But it flies horribly.
Mouais...
+2A part l'auto-aim, l'utilisation du Funky est inexistante.
T'aurais du le rendre contrôlable, tout en conservant l'auto-aim.
Le tank en lui même est assez bien construit (mis à part le canon qui a le calibre d'une carabine à plombs), c'est assez dommage.
Very nice looking, but bad flying.
+4I thank ollielebananiaCFSP for sending me a link via your challenge, I had a project in progress and I intend to participate in it.
@Bluepink @BogdanX
+5Okay, better stop the debate there, I just wanted to say what I thought of this plane.
But that may not be the place.
Still, it's very well done, it's the best F35 on the site!
@Bluepink, @BogdanX
+4This plane sells well just because it's American. By purchasing this aircraft, countries benefit from American "protection".
The only positive point of this plane is its lower RCS, but it is also not invisible to the eye of a good AESA, it is not an F22..
So, in air-to-air combat, its only advantage will be in BVR, but frankly, in a medium-close range fight, for example, between a Gripen and an F35, I'd rather be in the Gripen than in the F35...
For me, this plane is a failure, adopting new technologies, but still a failure.
With all these billions, we could have produced something other than this dung, which in 20 years will no longer have any advantage over any type of modern aircraft.
You also have to think in the long term, because the life of a fighter aircraft is not just 20 years, but rather 30 or even 40 years, while undergoing improvements during its operational life.
So you need a good base, and the F35 is not a good base.
I also don't like to talk about these stories of generations..
I can't tell the difference between 5th and 4th+ or that sort of thing.
For me, the RCS does not determine the generation, the Rafale is the same age as the F22, and yet, they are not classified in the same generation... This generation story would not be slightly modified by the American propaganda in order to sell better ?
Despite what I think of the F35, your plane is amazing, good job !!
+2Nice !
Interesting design.
+2The warships of the future will surely look like this..
Very nice.
Really good Mirage for 25 parts.
+1Waiting for some "brrrrrrrt" comment.
Pas mal du tout ton Heinkel !
+1Il aurait cependant pu être un peu plus maniable.
War Thunder.
+2Mig27 cancer.
Nice plane.
Looks a bit like YF23 and Dassault's NGF.
But with such small air intakes, and such a design, I don't see how this plane could go to Mach4..
+2This plane, given its look, would not exceed Mach 2.3...
For the altitude, ramjets would not even be enough to reach it, it would also require rocket engines.. and your plane got normal reactors..
In short, this aircraft would have at the maximum the performance of an F22.
Incredible plane.
+1Toi aussi ?
+1Tu me déçois.
Il est incroyable.
T
+1Damn, the 20K parts Yamato has finally found its master.
+3One of the best ships on the site. Incredible work and staggering number of parts.
You must have spent tens hours making it.
I understand. An hypersonic glider, with an as yet unknown mode of propulsion (antigravity?)
Alright, that's good.
+3That's good, because you refrained from putting German Mig29 as a name, and you didn't coat it with airbrakes.
Damn, incredible walker.
+2@GainTale I don't see any others major flaws.
+1@ollielebananiaCFSP "One of the best", not the best.
+1My personal opinion about your plane
The positive points :
- it is quite well made
- it has an original livery
- Custom armaments are fine.
- Part count is reasonable.
The negative points :
- the HUD is not finished
- it is too slow (An SMB2 is literally faster)
- And on the roll/elevator control surfaces of the wing, there is a sign "non step" in English, but you mistranslated it, normally it should have said "Ne pas marcher".
Otherwise, it's one of the best Rafale on the site, well done !
+4T
+1T
As for me, I have only an extremely limited time, and I have only just started the Andromeda.
+2Good Haunebu !
+1There are many similarities with my IIB (and also my III), the portholes are however of a different model, (mine are small armored holes), the interior is very successful.
Only criticism (because I always have to make one), the turret is not auto-aim.
But it does not matter, the whole is successful, and it is a good Haunebu !
@FuhrerGaming it must have been someone else with your plane then.
I saw you in multiplayer some minuts ago.
Well, great design again !