@Vincent yes, I know, my message about Mostly house was satiric too.
@EternalDarkness , yes I will stop that, it's boring.
But I don't know when they will stop.
Well, I will delte my first comment, I'm bored, I don't want to be tagged again and again, it's maybe a 'joke', but unfunny. Rafale is not ugly !!
@Dllama4
- Which country has won the most military victories in the world ?
- objective response: France. LINK
- Who had the best army and the best equipped army between Germany and France in 1939 ?
-objective answer: France LINK
- Who has the best army in Europe today (and the 1st Europe's military power) ?
-objective answer: France LINK
- Who is the best general of all time and the one who has won the most battles ?
-objective answer: Napoléon. LINK
Who owns the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world ?
-objective answer: France LINK
What is not OBJECTIVE in what I am saying ? On the contrary, my text is an example of objectivity, I am giving you VALID and PROVEN ARGUMENTS, not as the pathetic "mêmes" and at the level of those who say it concerning France, the same idiots full of jealousy and absurdities.
Once again, what I'm saying is true, have fun checking it out, it will teach you a few things, the B1 tank was 2x better armored than the German Panzers in 1939, more efficient, everyone knows that, there is something non-objective in there? Answer, no ! Seek, but you won't find, all I'm saying is the facts.
@Walvis
Yeah, except that the french army was better (navy, air froce, land), with better equipment, and numerically better, but not the leaders of our army, I advise you to go cultivate yourselves on the subject if that interests you, but if we had a good staff at the time, we would have largely won, we had everything better than the Germans, they used the strategy, the blitzkrieg, and won thanks to their strategy. At the time, France was considered as the 1st world military power !
The Luftwaffe implemented essentially six types of aircraft (a single single-seat fighter, another twin-engine fighter, three medium bombers and a ground attack aircraft) where the French Air Force put at least 18 in line. (six different types of fighters including one twin-engine, seven bombers, two assault aircraft, three types of reconnaissance aircraft), three times more.
Ground army level, better tanks, B1 tanks were twice as armored (32mm for the B1, 14.5mm for the Panzer II), B1 tanks also had better guns firing further... some B1 display a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers ! (copied from my 1st comment), more equipment, more soldiers ...
Navy level, more ships, more powerful ships, it is the 4th navy in the world, and well ahead of the Kriegsmarine. And to break a myth, I also point out that the Richelieu, launched to respond to the Bismarck was better armored than Bismarck, twice as well armed frontally, the Richelieu had 2 turrets of 4 380mm guns at the front, against only two turrets of two 380mm guns for Bismarck, the total firepower of the Bismarck's weapons was concentrated just in the front part of the Richelieu, so instead of showing off, the allies should rather have sent the Richelieu to sink Bismarck instead of the old Hood !
All that to say that with a good general staff adopting a strategy of real modern movement warfare, we could have crushed the German army, if we had put De Gaulle at the head of the general staff, it would have been something else, Moreover, De Gaulle was trying to make himself heard at the time, but no one listened to him, one should have, his strategy would have been the right one.
It's funny to make jokes about us .... But don't forget that we are the country in the world that has won the most wars and battles in the world, (1115 battles won), and don't forget Napoléon.
But that sort of thing will obviously never happen again, given that we have the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world, the leading military power in Europe, first Air force of Europe, 1st Navy, 1st Army, no one will ever come to annoy us again.
@PaperPlaneHasDream
I know very well ! And the T055 is about 24 meters different from a Burke, so the destroyers in the game are undersized. But the T055 is almost a cruiser, let's say this boat is the maximum size for a destroyer.
"the production stopped when it is saw ineffective to panzers of germans,"
We must not take the German panzers at the start of the war for exceptional tanks, just one B1 tank could have a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers, the armor of French tanks was twice as good (32mm for the B1, 14,5mm for the Panzer II), with better guns firing further ... They just adopted a modern war strategy, they do not owe the victory to the quality of their materials, but just to their Blitzkrieg strategy.
Otherwise, your concept and idea is good, but if a shell wounds or kills the only crew member, the tank is screwed, I would have put at least two, a driver-radio operator, and a gunner-commander.
It is true that the J12 is underestimated, but it was only a prototype, more or less, so normal that we hear little about it, in addition, it did not have a spectacular design, but still, he should be better known as the first Chinese fighter, the second photo is a J8... The J11s, J15s are fine, but they are improved Su27s, and the J10 is better (and prettier with its canards) than the F 16 !
When the J20, we do not know its exact performance, do not say that it is shit before having had the proof. They still managed to make a stealth plane, in any case, I would prefer to see you do a J-12, there must not be many on Simple Planes, and it would be more interesting than releasing yet another Mig ..
@shipster
The French army is just better than yours, don't care of americains, we talk about french and english army's... and I don't want to play politics, but the French army would be better with the Russian army as an ally than the American army, the Americans always do anything about it. terrain, destabilize countries and create terrorist groups (gulf war). The French army is the first in Europe, much superior to yours, obviously, we have twice the number of your combat tanks, ours are more modern, they are even the most expensive in the world (Leclerc tank), we have better artillery, twice as many soldiers, better trained, 2x bigger nuclear arsenal, we have everything better than you, it's a fact, the navy, aviation and space, you are now the second army in Europe (behind Italy if it had the weapon and nuclear propulsion), your land army is nothing in Europe, even Spain can beat you in the ground, you don't have bases all over the world unlike us, we don't need the Americans to make our weapons like missiles, you buy your missiles from the Americans, even nuclear !!
Ours are superior, look at our M51, MdcN, Exocet, Aster, SCALP, ASMPA, etc... our MICA missiles are excellent, and fitted to the Rafale, and at least are French, we do not lose the know-how of manufacturing weapons, if there is a war, our ammunition will be "unlimited", you on the other hand, will have to ask the Americans to provide you with the missiles, if they don't want, they won't, you are the toy of the americans, you even buy them your nuclear missiles ! You also buy french ASTERs....
In 2023, we will have our first anti-satellite laser satellites in space, we are beyond you on everything !
Stop asking if I smoke, or something else, whoever has valid arguments here, it's not you, I'm opposing valid arguments, not "what did you smoke?", learn to hold a normal conversation without getting angry or saying bullshit, your way of writing and reasoning leads me to think that the guy who smokes here is you.
@shipster In the 21 th century, France has the best army (widely), Air, Navy, and land, we have everything better, even in space, anti-satellite laser satellites in 2023, the British are far behind, definitely.
We have a nuclear arsenal twice the size of yours, with French missiles much more powerful and efficient than the American missiles you buy.
France produces its weapons, does not buy them, has a technological advance, you have the EF 2000, a rather bad European plane, we have the Rafale, the best fighter plane in the world, we have the Leclerc tank, the most technological, and the most expensive in the world, you are far behind, it's like comparing the USA to China.
It's why France is ahead of you in the ranking of world armies.
@shipster uh no, in fact, i'm quoting a real historical fact, i'm returning the question to you 🤪🤪🤪, you invent a fictitious reality ... very strange, anyway, we would never have let britain have america, never, and we kicked them out of America, do you know Lafayette ? Besides, the Hermione you see below was his boat!
In short, you would never have had America.
We don't say United States, we say america, at the time, the USA did not exist...
One of your ex-colonies has become stronger than you: India, bigger army, better economy, somewhat humiliating, right ?
I won't awnser before tomorrow, if you answer ...
@tristarsus the american navy doesn't have the stuff we have, the MDCN, cruise missile better than the good old Tomahawk, the stealth ships were created by france in 1990, the lafayette class, and did you know that during an exercise, a French submarine sank an American aircraft carrier and its escort
@F104Deathtrap I rectify, the English have at that time 600 Hurricanes and Spitfires, otherwise, I pretty much agree on the rest, the Chain-Home radar has effectively helped the RAF. But what is sure is that the Germans were in numerical superiority (2500 planes).
@rexzion
Little kid, we don't say "ok french man", we say "ok", you have to learn to speak miserable little english wanker, when i talk to a roast beef, i don't say "ok, english man ".
@MDDJB
don't think about it, china is an emerging superpower, it is normal that it takes a while to develop, but you will see in 10 or 20 years, there will be more 100% chinese equipment, the india buys French Rafales, so it also does not produce its own equipment.
I would NEVER go to this "Belphégor", the name does not inspire confidence, but you can faint at the sight of the plane, this thing is almost criminal! put this in a flying club, and the members will complain for trauma !!
@Shimamurahougetsu
+2@Nerfaddict
@Bryan5
@Shimamurahougetsu
+2@Nerfaddict
@Bryan5
@BeastHunter
@BarrowAircraft
I don't agree with your point of view.
+2Very nice ICBM, functional and detailed ! Indeed, even if you lack a bit of modesty, we have here the most beautiful ICBM in the game !
+2Wow, well done, the best HE-162 of the site !!
+2Very nice, great job!!
+2In reality, I doubt that this thing managed to take off 😅😅 !!
+2And what a great target for the rockets !
Well, if you need 100 points, I will upvote :)
+2I don't even have the words to describe the build quality of this ship.
+2Wonderful work.
NICE !
+2I like these old race cars, my favorite from these years is the Alfa Roméo Alfetta 159.
Impressive ship again.
+2@Vincent yes, I know, my message about Mostly house was satiric too.
+2@EternalDarkness , yes I will stop that, it's boring.
But I don't know when they will stop.
Well, I will delte my first comment, I'm bored, I don't want to be tagged again and again, it's maybe a 'joke', but unfunny. Rafale is not ugly !!
+2@Dllama4
@Dllama4 And you, are you okay ?
+2Very nice Hornet.
+2@TheMaus Nationalist ? Who ? Me or the yank ?
+2I'm a patriot, and I'm realist.
@Ergi I'm nice to the nice people, I'm bad to the bad guys.
+2I'm still going to change the title and put "a bad guy" instead of idiot.
This thing looks fantastic, alas, I would never dare to download it, my computer would die instantly.
+2𝓔𝓽 𝓶𝓸𝓲 𝓳𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬'𝓮𝓼𝓽 𝓾𝓷 𝓫𝓮𝓵 𝓪𝓿𝓲𝓸𝓷.
+2@Dllama4
+2Rafale > Eurofighter
(yes, I really reply a 1.6 years old message)
incredible.
+2On two drawings, there are two planes, one crashes, the other bounces, what do the two drawings have in common ?
On the two drawings, we can see the writing ''BOEING ''
This joke is not funny: I know, that's why I wrote it in this phorum...
. . .
+2@Walvis
Well, let's be OBJECTIVE !!!
- Which country has won the most military victories in the world ?
- objective response: France.
LINK
- Who had the best army and the best equipped army between Germany and France in 1939 ?
-objective answer: France
LINK
- Who has the best army in Europe today (and the 1st Europe's military power) ?
-objective answer: France
LINK
- Who is the best general of all time and the one who has won the most battles ?
-objective answer: Napoléon.
LINK
Who owns the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world ?
-objective answer: France
LINK
What is not OBJECTIVE in what I am saying ? On the contrary, my text is an example of objectivity, I am giving you VALID and PROVEN ARGUMENTS, not as the pathetic "mêmes" and at the level of those who say it concerning France, the same idiots full of jealousy and absurdities.
Once again, what I'm saying is true, have fun checking it out, it will teach you a few things, the B1 tank was 2x better armored than the German Panzers in 1939, more efficient, everyone knows that, there is something non-objective in there? Answer, no ! Seek, but you won't find, all I'm saying is the facts.
+2@Walvis
+2Yeah, except that the french army was better (navy, air froce, land), with better equipment, and numerically better, but not the leaders of our army, I advise you to go cultivate yourselves on the subject if that interests you, but if we had a good staff at the time, we would have largely won, we had everything better than the Germans, they used the strategy, the blitzkrieg, and won thanks to their strategy.
At the time, France was considered as the 1st world military power !
The Luftwaffe implemented essentially six types of aircraft (a single single-seat fighter, another twin-engine fighter, three medium bombers and a ground attack aircraft) where the French Air Force put at least 18 in line. (six different types of fighters including one twin-engine, seven bombers, two assault aircraft, three types of reconnaissance aircraft), three times more.
Ground army level, better tanks, B1 tanks were twice as armored (32mm for the B1, 14.5mm for the Panzer II), B1 tanks also had better guns firing further... some B1 display a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers ! (copied from my 1st comment), more equipment, more soldiers ...
Navy level, more ships, more powerful ships, it is the 4th navy in the world, and well ahead of the Kriegsmarine. And to break a myth, I also point out that the Richelieu, launched to respond to the Bismarck was better armored than Bismarck, twice as well armed frontally, the Richelieu had 2 turrets of 4 380mm guns at the front, against only two turrets of two 380mm guns for Bismarck, the total firepower of the Bismarck's weapons was concentrated just in the front part of the Richelieu, so instead of showing off, the allies should rather have sent the Richelieu to sink Bismarck instead of the old Hood !
All that to say that with a good general staff adopting a strategy of real modern movement warfare, we could have crushed the German army, if we had put De Gaulle at the head of the general staff, it would have been something else, Moreover, De Gaulle was trying to make himself heard at the time, but no one listened to him, one should have, his strategy would have been the right one.
It's funny to make jokes about us .... But don't forget that we are the country in the world that has won the most wars and battles in the world, (1115 battles won), and don't forget Napoléon.
But that sort of thing will obviously never happen again, given that we have the 3rd nuclear arsenal in the world, the leading military power in Europe, first Air force of Europe, 1st Navy, 1st Army, no one will ever come to annoy us again.
@PaperPlaneHasDream
+2I know very well ! And the T055 is about 24 meters different from a Burke, so the destroyers in the game are undersized. But the T055 is almost a cruiser, let's say this boat is the maximum size for a destroyer.
Not bad, this destroyer, prettier than American destroyers, but still a little too oversized.
+2It's not just a German helicopter, but half French-half German.
+2@AN2Felllla For boat drawings, there is a good site: Shipbucket
+2"the production stopped when it is saw ineffective to panzers of germans,"
We must not take the German panzers at the start of the war for exceptional tanks, just one B1 tank could have a ratio of 14 destroyed panzers, the armor of French tanks was twice as good (32mm for the B1, 14,5mm for the Panzer II), with better guns firing further ... They just adopted a modern war strategy, they do not owe the victory to the quality of their materials, but just to their Blitzkrieg strategy.
Otherwise, your concept and idea is good, but if a shell wounds or kills the only crew member, the tank is screwed, I would have put at least two, a driver-radio operator, and a gunner-commander.
+2The Komet Soviet version.
+2It is true that the J12 is underestimated, but it was only a prototype, more or less, so normal that we hear little about it, in addition, it did not have a spectacular design, but still, he should be better known as the first Chinese fighter, the second photo is a J8... The J11s, J15s are fine, but they are improved Su27s, and the J10 is better (and prettier with its canards) than the F 16 !
+2When the J20, we do not know its exact performance, do not say that it is shit before having had the proof. They still managed to make a stealth plane, in any case, I would prefer to see you do a J-12, there must not be many on Simple Planes, and it would be more interesting than releasing yet another Mig ..
Nice replica, too bad the real project was put on hold !
+2Nice Type 054A.
+2@shipster
The French army is just better than yours, don't care of americains, we talk about french and english army's... and I don't want to play politics, but the French army would be better with the Russian army as an ally than the American army, the Americans always do anything about it. terrain, destabilize countries and create terrorist groups (gulf war).
The French army is the first in Europe, much superior to yours, obviously, we have twice the number of your combat tanks, ours are more modern, they are even the most expensive in the world (Leclerc tank), we have better artillery, twice as many soldiers, better trained, 2x bigger nuclear arsenal, we have everything better than you, it's a fact, the navy, aviation and space, you are now the second army in Europe (behind Italy if it had the weapon and nuclear propulsion), your land army is nothing in Europe, even Spain can beat you in the ground, you don't have bases all over the world unlike us, we don't need the Americans to make our weapons like missiles, you buy your missiles from the Americans, even nuclear !!
Ours are superior, look at our M51, MdcN, Exocet, Aster, SCALP, ASMPA, etc... our MICA missiles are excellent, and fitted to the Rafale, and at least are French, we do not lose the know-how of manufacturing weapons, if there is a war, our ammunition will be "unlimited", you on the other hand, will have to ask the Americans to provide you with the missiles, if they don't want, they won't, you are the toy of the americans, you even buy them your nuclear missiles ! You also buy french ASTERs....
In 2023, we will have our first anti-satellite laser satellites in space, we are beyond you on everything !
Stop asking if I smoke, or something else, whoever has valid arguments here, it's not you, I'm opposing valid arguments, not "what did you smoke?", learn to hold a normal conversation without getting angry or saying bullshit, your way of writing and reasoning leads me to think that the guy who smokes here is you.
+2@shipster In the 21 th century, France has the best army (widely), Air, Navy, and land, we have everything better, even in space, anti-satellite laser satellites in 2023, the British are far behind, definitely.
We have a nuclear arsenal twice the size of yours, with French missiles much more powerful and efficient than the American missiles you buy.
France produces its weapons, does not buy them, has a technological advance, you have the EF 2000, a rather bad European plane, we have the Rafale, the best fighter plane in the world, we have the Leclerc tank, the most technological, and the most expensive in the world, you are far behind, it's like comparing the USA to China.
It's why France is ahead of you in the ranking of world armies.
+2@shipster uh no, in fact, i'm quoting a real historical fact, i'm returning the question to you 🤪🤪🤪, you invent a fictitious reality ... very strange, anyway, we would never have let britain have america, never, and we kicked them out of America, do you know Lafayette ? Besides, the Hermione you see below was his boat!
+2In short, you would never have had America.
We don't say United States, we say america, at the time, the USA did not exist...
One of your ex-colonies has become stronger than you: India, bigger army, better economy, somewhat humiliating, right ?
I won't awnser before tomorrow, if you answer ...
@tristarsus the american navy doesn't have the stuff we have, the MDCN, cruise missile better than the good old Tomahawk, the stealth ships were created by france in 1990, the lafayette class, and did you know that during an exercise, a French submarine sank an American aircraft carrier and its escort
+2Nice ship.
+2Very good F15, it is beautiful, flies well, nice plane.
+2@F104Deathtrap I rectify, the English have at that time 600 Hurricanes and Spitfires, otherwise, I pretty much agree on the rest, the Chain-Home radar has effectively helped the RAF. But what is sure is that the Germans were in numerical superiority (2500 planes).
+2Nice tank !
+2The most realistic car of the game, one of the most beautiful too ! Nice work.
+2@MikeWallace Great ship.
+2@Spectres Stay in your delirium, alone, that's good, but stop mentioning me, please.
+2@rexzion
+2Little kid, we don't say "ok french man", we say "ok", you have to learn to speak miserable little english wanker, when i talk to a roast beef, i don't say "ok, english man ".
@MDDJB
+2don't think about it, china is an emerging superpower, it is normal that it takes a while to develop, but you will see in 10 or 20 years, there will be more 100% chinese equipment, the india buys French Rafales, so it also does not produce its own equipment.
@StepBro funny Russians, pay with submarines ...
+2@F104Deathtrap maybe, but I'd rather fill this thing with insecticide, it looks like a farm plane, rustic, strange, but with a jet engine !
I imagine the good peasant boasting of having a jet plane ...
+2I would NEVER go to this "Belphégor", the name does not inspire confidence, but you can faint at the sight of the plane, this thing is almost criminal! put this in a flying club, and the members will complain for trauma !!
+2Wow, it's strange, massive, but nice.
+2