@ToeTips
I’m making some modifications to this, don’t know if I’m gonna upload it, but I’m having issues. It’s been working well enough, but now all of the sudden it will continuously roll (typically left, but it can roll right too) without any input.
@Stephen22
I can’t tell if you’re joking. If you’re talking about the glove vanes, I know about those. These canards from the teaser don’t exist on any Tomcat and in my opinion don’t quite fit in with the rest of the build.
@Zaineman
I need a RIO purely so I can use him as the forbidden flare lol
But then again I wouldn’t need him if no one shoots at me, and who would shoot at a plane with… ahemMulticolored Killing Device.
I get that this isn’t exactly a realistic build lol, but I can’t help being a geek and seeing problems with the realism.
Where’s my RIO? I need a back seater in my Tomcat!
The wings gradually sweep back depending on the speed, not fully as soon as it breaks mach one.
Also, there’s no APU on the Tomcat.
Rainbow guns are highly realistic though, should be on every build.
@CallsignTig
The link brings it back to this page.
It should be like this:
[Whatever](https://info.publicintelligence.net/F14AAD-1.pdf)
(Working: Whatever)
The main issue is that the engines are too low. They pitch the aircraft up, and at too low of speeds at full power, the horizontal stabilizers don’t create enough stability to keep it flying straight.
The overall pitch can be improved my making the wings and stabilizers farther apart.
I don’t think P-51s were used in the pacific theater, they’re not carrier capable. Same the B-25s, but I’ll let them slide considering the Doolittle Raid.
@ToeTips
Oh, by the way, I just updated my profile to have that which reminded me that you stopped your bio renovation. You say you need motivation? Here’s your motivation:
DO IT OR I SCARE YOU
If you don’t, do this:
Take 1300 and combine the 1 and 3
(It should look like this:
@Bobobobob
7:51.87
I’d estimate 7:50 for time between turning on and off the timer.
4:37.32
I ran out of fuel.
Imma try again
@Stephen22
Yeah it’s working now. Weird SimplePlanes crap. Probably didn’t work from a lack of an update.
@ToeTips
I’m making some modifications to this, don’t know if I’m gonna upload it, but I’m having issues. It’s been working well enough, but now all of the sudden it will continuously roll (typically left, but it can roll right too) without any input.
(I figured it out)
@Stephen22
I can’t tell if you’re joking. If you’re talking about the glove vanes, I know about those. These canards from the teaser don’t exist on any Tomcat and in my opinion don’t quite fit in with the rest of the build.
@ToeTips
I’ll fly it, then give you my critiques.
@ToeTip
Danger Sone starts playing
KPH? PSHHHHH! MPH? Better...
BUT I NEED KNOTS!!!
What can I say? I just like knots.
@Ac3Zodiac
My bad, but I ain’t a dummy. See? I would have said I ain’t no dummy, but I’m not stupid enough for double negatives. Lol
@Ac3Zodiac
SIM bros? War Thunder isn’t a sim.
@TinyMaus
Wrong answer
Lol
My second favorite Cessna!
(No not the 172, the 337 Skymaster)
Found a bug:
If you pitch up very slightly, it’ll pitch down.
I hit Mach 1.45 at <10ft. Nothing happened.
@Zdeam12OG
That’s encouraging lol
Looks like ya might need a cockpit there…
You gonna make one or would you like me to, I’m open to helping.
Also:
T
@LoneSpaceGaming
I just mean it might be hypnotic
@Zaineman
I need a RIO purely so I can use him as the forbidden flare lol
But then again I wouldn’t need him if no one shoots at me, and who would shoot at a plane with… ahem
Multicolored Killing Device.I get that this isn’t exactly a realistic build lol, but I can’t help being a geek and seeing problems with the realism.
Where’s my RIO? I need a back seater in my Tomcat!
The wings gradually sweep back depending on the speed, not fully as soon as it breaks mach one.
Also, there’s no APU on the Tomcat.
Rainbow guns are highly realistic though, should be on every build.
@All
Cool! Glad to hear you're better!
Performance cost to part count ratio is…
Wait for it…!
1,006.66…
Points per Part
@CallsignTig
Nice!
@CallsignTig
The link brings it back to this page.
It should be like this:
[Whatever](https://info.publicintelligence.net/F14AAD-1.pdf)
(Working: Whatever)
@CallsignTig
Sorry, can’t do it through Discord so I guys an unlisted post, or a forum will have to do.
Also I can teach you
this
kinda
stuffAnd links too like this
@Carsonkiddy2
So is the Su-25
I might attempt this.
The main issue is that the engines are too low. They pitch the aircraft up, and at too low of speeds at full power, the horizontal stabilizers don’t create enough stability to keep it flying straight.
The overall pitch can be improved my making the wings and stabilizers farther apart.
If you have any questions just ask!
@WaterFlavouredSpitfires
It says in the first sentence “land based”. It appears it was operated by the Japanese navy though, just not on carriers.
I don’t know anything about the G4M but it doesn’t look carrier capable. I think I’ll enter the challenge though!
I don’t think P-51s were used in the pacific theater, they’re not carrier capable. Same the B-25s, but I’ll let them slide considering the Doolittle Raid.
Interesting upvote number…
@toorbokkot
Okay, thanks I was wondering what the difference was.
I guess this is its nickname? It’s typically called the Su-25
@ToeTips
Same… but I do anyway.
How do you do the visitors thing?
@Mahoots
Looks nice!
@ToeTips
Oh, by the way, I just updated my profile to have that which reminded me that you stopped your bio renovation. You say you need motivation? Here’s your motivation:
DO IT OR I SCARE YOU
If you don’t, do this:
Take 1300 and combine the 1 and 3
(It should look like this:
BOO)
And Happy Halloween
@ToeTips
Thanks, I guess?
This looks pretty cool!
Idk if this was intended, but you named it the F35B and the F-35B is a real aircraft.
T
I’m here if you need any sponsors. And for anyone who has a company but lacks a logo, I can make one.
This is great!
One minor note is that the rudder deflects the wrong way.
Um… you might wanna take a look at your current points
These are the most cursed appearance ratings ever
@All
I hope get better quick!
@All
Sure! I’d love to have you.
@Randomplayer
Probable 1970/80s-Modern day. Stuff like the tomcat would be fine.
@ToeTips
Thought you might like this!
I would suggest making a blocky cockpit out of fuselage parts instead of the default cockpit, it just would look a little nicer. The rest looks great!
@VoidGuardian
Thanks man
If you need help on the version with the cockpit, I love building cockpits!