2,427 CallsignGizmo Comments

  • J40 QianLong (The Silent Dragon) 1.7 years ago

    @TjEDHow new to SimplePlanes are you?

  • F-14 VF-1 Wolfpack 1.7 years ago

    Oh no… not another Tomcat that I’m gonna judge way to harshly…

  • J40 QianLong (The Silent Dragon) 1.7 years ago

    This looks amazing, the one thing that would make it better would be turning on smooth front and back on the fuselage pieces.


    My Gripes:
    You wouldn’t be able to fit a gun in the place it is on this, and the gasses from firing it would go straight into the air intake. The cockpit is too short (you can barely see over it), but that’s it! Other than that this is awesome, this should be front page!

    +1
  • BUG: Camera movement via mouse input just stops working during some flights. 1.7 years ago

    @Walvis
    How did you get the mouse to work as an axis? I tried but it doesn't detect it?

  • F-14B -Sakura Maritime Forces- 1.7 years ago

    @Randomplayer
    Bit of a run on with some of those sentences.

  • F-14B -Sakura Maritime Forces- 1.7 years ago

    I’m disappointed.
    There’s no WSO (Spelled WSO not WISO) onboard the F-14, it’s a RIO.

  • Low-budget Electric Fan 1.7 years ago

    It's my biggest fan!
    Now Imma use about fifty thousand of these to make a plane fly.

    +3
  • I HAVE MADE ROCKET PODS!!!!!!!!! 1.7 years ago

    @Rolis
    Thanks! :)

  • [Teaser] New WWI Biplane Project! VR Test Pilots Needed! 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    You want a sneak peak of it? I can tag you on the unlisted post if you want.

  • I HAVE MADE ROCKET PODS!!!!!!!!! 1.7 years ago

    @Rolis
    Do you mind if I use these? I might, they look quite nice. I’ll credit you of course!

  • [Teaser] New WWI Biplane Project! VR Test Pilots Needed! 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    How does the autotag thing work? For the future when my builds are actually decent.

  • [Teaser] New WWI Biplane Project! VR Test Pilots Needed! 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    It’s closed.

  • [Teaser] New WWI Biplane Project! VR Test Pilots Needed! 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    No, I didn’t know there was one!

  • [Teaser] New WWI Biplane Project! VR Test Pilots Needed! 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    I know you don’t use VR, but I thought you might want to see it :)

  • Low Part Ground Prop Challenge 1.7 years ago

    @Randomplayer
    Now that I’m thinking about it, I don’t really care what era anymore, you can build whatever you’d like.

  • WHY DOES THIS EXPLOAD AFTER TAKEOFF 1.7 years ago

    @Stephen22
    No it would explode unprovoked, not from the over-g mechanism I made

  • ONLY FOR MASTER SP PILOTS WW2 plane custom wing cover with torpedo but only one blade per engine 1.7 years ago

    @Bobobobob
    7:51.87
    I’d estimate 7:50 for time between turning on and off the timer.

  • WHY DOES THIS EXPLOAD AFTER TAKEOFF 1.7 years ago

    @Stephen22
    Yeah it’s working now. Weird SimplePlanes crap. Probably didn’t work from a lack of an update.

  • F-14X Advanced Tomcat MKII 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    I’m making some modifications to this, don’t know if I’m gonna upload it, but I’m having issues. It’s been working well enough, but now all of the sudden it will continuously roll (typically left, but it can roll right too) without any input.

    (I figured it out)

  • F-14....?(TVC+Canard) 1.7 years ago

    @Stephen22
    I can’t tell if you’re joking. If you’re talking about the glove vanes, I know about those. These canards from the teaser don’t exist on any Tomcat and in my opinion don’t quite fit in with the rest of the build.

  • F-14X Advanced Tomcat MKII 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    I would spotlight you, but you gotta quit being better than me!

    +1
  • F-14X Advanced Tomcat MKII 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    I think it’s great, it’s supposed to be like the Tomcat after all. I know you aren’t trying to make a 1:1 Tomcat replica, so I’ll try to filter out my notes on the inaccuracies of the Tomcat.


    1: Wing Sweep

    The wing sweep is automatic (but has a manual and emergency [hydraulic] mode) and especially for a 5th Gen aircraft, I think the wing sweep would be automatic.


    2: Wing Shape

    Over all, it’s looks pretty good. I would have extended the trailing edge of the wing root, as it makes the aircraft look more realistic and less weak, and it would fill in most of the gap between the ruddervators. Just a personal preference, but something I think I should say.


    3: Heads Up Display.

    The HUD would I believe stay stationary above the glare shield, even if it’s displayed from the HMD. The Velocity Vector and Pitch Ladder are not accurate anywhere but pointing in the same direction as the nose.


    Notes: The FBW and thrust vectoring is a little weird at times, but they’re far from easy to make a tune. Trust me. I’ve tried. (Semi-successfully)
    I like the touch of automatic flaps, I think you would find those on most, if not all, 5th Gen aircraft.
    Thanks for another great build, man!
    (So sorry for another long comment!)

    +1
  • F-14X Advanced Tomcat MKII 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTips
    I’ll fly it, then give you my critiques.

  • The average Ace Combat pilot 1.7 years ago

    @ToeTip
    Danger Sone starts playing

  • The average Ace Combat pilot 1.7 years ago

    Music: 10/10
    Video: 6/10
    Meme: 9/10

    Overall:

    11/10

    What do you mean that’s not the average of 6, 9, and 10?

    +2
  • Realistic Santos-Dumont 14-bis 1.7 years ago

    KPH? PSHHHHH! MPH? Better...

    BUT I NEED KNOTS!!!

    What can I say? I just like knots.

  • D Point 1.7 years ago

    @Ac3Zodiac
    My bad, but I ain’t a dummy. See? I would have said I ain’t no dummy, but I’m not stupid enough for double negatives. Lol

  • D Point 1.7 years ago

    @Ac3Zodiac
    SIM bros? War Thunder isn’t a sim.

  • D Point 1.7 years ago

    ATTACK THE D POINT!

    +1
  • A skeleton 1.8 years ago

    Easy fix if you crash, just drink some milk

    +2
  • Cessna 152 (98 Parts) 1.8 years ago

    @TinyMaus
    Wrong answer
    Lol

  • Cessna 152 (98 Parts) 1.8 years ago

    My second favorite Cessna!
    (No not the 172, the 337 Skymaster)

  • F-16X Fighting Phoenix (Stealth Falcon) 1.8 years ago

    Found a bug:
    If you pitch up very slightly, it’ll pitch down.

  • F-16X Fighting Phoenix (Stealth Falcon) 1.8 years ago

    I hit Mach 1.45 at <10ft. Nothing happened.

  • F-16X Fighting Phoenix (Stealth Falcon) 1.8 years ago

    After reading the warning of transonic and supersonic speeds, I shall now proceed to do exactly that.

    +1
  • F-16X Fighting Phoenix (Stealth Falcon) 1.8 years ago

    As a Viper fan, this is gorgeous!

    The cockpit looks great too!
    One note though, the Vulcan Cam and the Rear Cam cameras are visible you can add hidePart under CameraVantage and set it to true. Then they will be invisible in-game.

    +1
  • my first plane v19 727 1.8 years ago

    @Zdeam12OG
    That’s encouraging lol

  • F-14 fm is near completion 1.8 years ago

    Also why does someone also make something I made right after I do, but better. That camera shake from G-forces, I just made that for my tomcat, but now you do and it looks WAY better.

    +1
  • F-14 fm is near completion 1.8 years ago

    Looks like ya might need a cockpit there…

    You gonna make one or would you like me to, I’m open to helping.
    Also:

    T

  • PSM F-14 Tomcat ! 1.8 years ago

    @LoneSpaceGaming
    I just mean it might be hypnotic

  • PSM F-14 Tomcat ! 1.8 years ago

    @Zaineman
    I need a RIO purely so I can use him as the forbidden flare lol
    But then again I wouldn’t need him if no one shoots at me, and who would shoot at a plane with… ahem Multicolored Killing Device.

  • PSM F-14 Tomcat ! 1.8 years ago

    I get that this isn’t exactly a realistic build lol, but I can’t help being a geek and seeing problems with the realism.
    Where’s my RIO? I need a back seater in my Tomcat!
    The wings gradually sweep back depending on the speed, not fully as soon as it breaks mach one.
    Also, there’s no APU on the Tomcat.

    Rainbow guns are highly realistic though, should be on every build.

  • Low Part Ground Prop Challenge 1.8 years ago

    @All
    Cool! Glad to hear you're better!

  • Funky Trees Bandit Callout 1.8 years ago

    @hpgbproductions
    I was thinking along the lines of (TargetHeading - Heading) / 180

    +1
  • 1993 Toyota Supra (Left Side Drive) 1.9 years ago

    IS THAT A SUPRA?!

    +1
  • MiG-29UB | 9-51 RSK-MiG 1.9 years ago

    If you want a cockpit I’m here to help!

    +1
  • THE BEAUTY OF ILLUSION 1.9 years ago

    Performance cost to part count ratio is…
    Wait for it…!
    1,006.66…
    Points per Part

  • Tig's Tomcat Hangar (All things F-14!) 1.9 years ago

    @CallsignTig
    Nice!