I really don't know what to answer here, I pretty much said everything you need to know both in the comments and description. It's simple and yet self explanatory enough, as long as you read it.
.
Well, I tried to be "upbeat and positive", until you regurgitated "it doesn't work" for the last 19 hours commenting back and forth. You noice I kind of run out of patience when "what does it do" and "it doesn't work" is slapped on here for the last 19 hours. If it worked for others, it should work for you. It's a problem on your side; most likely not attached properly or not activated properly via VTOL. If you're really going to continue complaining, might as well tag me on whatever you used it on... @Vanistheman
@Vanistheman
"It doesn't do anything..." - what would you like me to respond?
It does: Read the title
Why doesn't it work?
Read description, its most likely not attached or activated properly.
If it worked for more than 10 people, I really don't know why it isn't working for you. Most likely it's a mess-up on your end.
(Grumpy me at 11pm responding to somewhat pointless comments)
@AdrianFlyingAce You see, the wings are mounted on a wing-pod ish system, which in terms is connected to a tiny little ridge in the hollow multi-part fuselage. Removing that will cause a re-build of the wing; which I'm too lazy to re-build.
@Sarpanitu The key is whole numbers. If you have any decimals in any aspect (weight, scale), the whole thing f*s up. Even I can't make it work everytime; as it takes 4-5 tries each time for the negative weight to take affect.
@AdrianFlyingAce No to be rude, when you're working with a complex plane like that, one does not simply just 'remove the entire passenger area and fill it with fuselage parts'.
Yep, haven't uploaded it yet. There's pretty much no way of reducing it further down from 789 if everyone still want the cockpit... @AdrianFlyingAce @Kt1578
@Kevinairlines Play around with wing positioning, wing type as well as weight. Keep in mind the COM, COL and COT correlations are important as well. If all comes to the worst, do what I did on my private jet; whereas the main engine provides the thrust and is hidden, while the visible engine (the one where it's supposed to be in a replica) is set to 0 thrust, as it's just for looks,
It's a old reference (back when this post was made) when he would bypass the sucessor system and credit designs as his own. You'd be surprise to know how many times he got away with it... @MechWARRIOR57
@503rdAirborneSoldier It's intended to stabilize unstable airplanes, as well as VTOL/Helicopters. If you have a perfectly flying aircraft like that of @Hyperloop's, then this product provides little to no purpose. Also, make sure you are attaching this via the intended attachment point, make sure the internal contents are not compromised.
@MechWARRIOR57 Also, I don't really mind if you unfollow me for being friends with someone you despise. That's your choice for unfollowing and my choice of people to talk to. They don't need to match.
@MechWARRIOR57 Haha. I personally liked BOTH of them, despite their actions to others were unacceptable, they were great friends with me. It's sad to see how both of those talented users are now banished. However, they will not be forgotten by me, as they were one of my best friends on this site.
@BaconEggs Wait, after further examination, im pretty convinced this is supposed to be a 1:1 historically accurate obese variant of a DC-8 that magically flies faster.
@FlowerDealer Don't credit me, all I did was hosted the server. The modders did all the work developing the multiplayer mods.
I really don't know what to answer here, I pretty much said everything you need to know both in the comments and description. It's simple and yet self explanatory enough, as long as you read it.
.
Well, I tried to be "upbeat and positive", until you regurgitated "it doesn't work" for the last 19 hours commenting back and forth. You noice I kind of run out of patience when "what does it do" and "it doesn't work" is slapped on here for the last 19 hours. If it worked for others, it should work for you. It's a problem on your side; most likely not attached properly or not activated properly via VTOL. If you're really going to continue complaining, might as well tag me on whatever you used it on... @Vanistheman
@Vanistheman Well, that seems a lot like your problem. What do you want me to do? Go to your house and fix it?
@LeoTanaka2243 Magic.
@Vanistheman The purpose is literally said in the title...
@Vanistheman
"It doesn't do anything..." - what would you like me to respond?
It does: Read the title
Why doesn't it work?
Read description, its most likely not attached or activated properly.
If it worked for more than 10 people, I really don't know why it isn't working for you. Most likely it's a mess-up on your end.
(Grumpy me at 11pm responding to somewhat pointless comments)
Lmfao the cockpit is halarious! Nice work!!!
漂亮！
@MechWARRIOR57 Nope. It's called a ban.
Cool!
@Sauce Probably not.
@AdrianFlyingAce You see, the wings are mounted on a wing-pod ish system, which in terms is connected to a tiny little ridge in the hollow multi-part fuselage. Removing that will cause a re-build of the wing; which I'm too lazy to re-build.
@MechWARRIOR57 We give one warning before kick.
@Sarpanitu The key is whole numbers. If you have any decimals in any aspect (weight, scale), the whole thing f*s up. Even I can't make it work everytime; as it takes 4-5 tries each time for the negative weight to take affect.
@AdrianFlyingAce No to be rude, when you're working with a complex plane like that, one does not simply just 'remove the entire passenger area and fill it with fuselage parts'.
Yep, haven't uploaded it yet. There's pretty much no way of reducing it further down from 789 if everyone still want the cockpit... @AdrianFlyingAce @Kt1578
@Kevinairlines Play around with wing positioning, wing type as well as weight. Keep in mind the COM, COL and COT correlations are important as well. If all comes to the worst, do what I did on my private jet; whereas the main engine provides the thrust and is hidden, while the visible engine (the one where it's supposed to be in a replica) is set to 0 thrust, as it's just for looks,
@natekid2222 I already made a dc-10. Please search my profile before sending another angry comment.
@SpiritusRaptor @Mumpsy @flyingsteve88 I'm glad you guys liked it! :)
I love the incorporation of the gyro! This beauty flies great with it.
Incredible!
I never said anything about dislike. @MechWARRIOR57
Going to fly this later when I have time. Looks cool, as always.
Hey, you should really make a Steyr AUG-A3. It's easily one of my favorite firearms.
Looks sooo much better than the already amazing original upload. Have a spotlight! :^)
Very nice, as always!
It seemed so. I forgot you were blocked ever since your Concorde successor bypass incident back 6 months ago. @Kevinairlines
It's a old reference (back when this post was made) when he would bypass the sucessor system and credit designs as his own. You'd be surprise to know how many times he got away with it... @MechWARRIOR57
@JetFly Right here.
Very nice!
Very nice!
@503rdAirborneSoldier It's intended to stabilize unstable airplanes, as well as VTOL/Helicopters. If you have a perfectly flying aircraft like that of @Hyperloop's, then this product provides little to no purpose. Also, make sure you are attaching this via the intended attachment point, make sure the internal contents are not compromised.
Glad to hear from another satisfied customer! @SkyEyeMCCIX
Very very nice!
@TTHHSSSS Glad to hear!
Very nice!
Very cool!
@MechWARRIOR57 I don't really mind followers, the satisfaction of when others download and enjoy my work means much more.
@JayDay60 Cool! Since i never played CoD before, I did not recognize. :3
@MechWARRIOR57 Also, I don't really mind if you unfollow me for being friends with someone you despise. That's your choice for unfollowing and my choice of people to talk to. They don't need to match.
@MechWARRIOR57 Haha. I personally liked BOTH of them, despite their actions to others were unacceptable, they were great friends with me. It's sad to see how both of those talented users are now banished. However, they will not be forgotten by me, as they were one of my best friends on this site.
Cool! Kinda looks like reaper's gun from overwatch minus the stock. xD
Nice gun! Kinda reminds me of the Machina from Team Fortress 2
@flyingsteve88 im literally the exact opposite.
@natekid2222 I dont have a DC-3 or 'whatever' planned. Syntax error at 'come'
@jfriss I fixed it 2 months ago :3
@BaconEggs Wait, after further examination, im pretty convinced this is supposed to be a 1:1 historically accurate obese variant of a DC-8 that magically flies faster.
@BaconEggs ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@BaconEggs Wait, kms as in kill me or you? BTW, nice sub-sonic concorde triplane with afterburners.
That includes the "remove upvote" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)