@ChiChiWerx Indeed interesting. I am well aware of the design flaws of the Tupolev Tu-144, although not a BAS - but enough for us both to come into the conclusion that the Tupolev is indeed flawed in many ways that may well influence the incidence at the paris airshow. However, the source, PBS - a well-trusted source that covered the incident provided evidence, and I am simply using that to support the opinion.
I try to keep an open minded approach to incidents like this and see the reasoning of both sides of the argument. Thanks for sharing the information.
@CRJ900Pilot Not really tips. Its just through lots of math and practice. I might make a video explaining the math soon. I streamed quite a bit over the weekend on doing the wings, not sure if that helped.
I’ve also found that out while building my E-fan almost a year ago, but it never worked in my favour and would do some glitchy things during level flight. I ended up abandoning it. @EternalDarkness
If you wanna do a 3-way collab with MrSilverwolf and I on the MI-26, we'll be more than happy do do so. I got the swashplate and tail rotor done a few months ago but we never got to the fuselage due to a corrupt save file that has been recently fixed.
@jamesPLANESii
I mean, thats basically enough, plus some trial and error. Most of the things you're dealing with in an airfoil has a right angle somewhere to reference off of anyways.
I go more in depth to make sure its smooth, but often times trial and error is enough to do that.
@PancakeAddiction
As an ana and zen main - especially when I play ana, I wanna smash ur face when u ask for healing while jumping all over the place. xD
Rip. So if you were to accelerate retrograde for 10 seconds at 600m/s^2 and just turn off the engines, it would complete an orbit without falling into the atmosphere? Lol @BaconEggs
How does the orbital mechanics work in elite? Is it aerodynamic space or does it actually factor in continuous momentum when making a maneuver? (e.g. if you chase after a guy in retrograde motion, would you deorbit yourself?)
In my opinion (in which you’d happily deny) I found the US builds entertaining on its own, however you simply cannot compare the magnitude taken when comparing it to the British version. The builds itself were merely based on the ideas of the predecessor and sparked no new innnovative designs. However, a few of the builds were quite original.
@CoBros2
They didn’t have any creative vehicles either. 90% of which had been previously done by the British trio, and heck even the episodes were mere identical interns of content. My point is tp Imply there’s absolutely no creativity by just rebuilding a weather be a vehicle, a challenge or a “special” that had been previously done by the British counterpart. @CoBros2
This whole time I’ve been trying to tell you how there’s barely any creativity in the US version and you’d simply deny and deny the fact over and over again. @CoBros2
I’m not even ganna bother continuing this arguement. Trying to present something to your stubborn self is as difficult as the trying to make top gear a good show again. I have no idea why you think the show is worse because of the cast’s actions rather than cinematic content. If I recall correctly, you did emphasize on how the US’ show has better content.
they made hundreds of offensive and rather hilarious jokes throughout the years that landed them in hot water. The gone too far with on of their more recent ones. @CoBros2
Not sure. I might make my own or use the partcount the blinds take to do a simple livery. @MrSilverWolf
@ChiChiWerx Indeed interesting. I am well aware of the design flaws of the Tupolev Tu-144, although not a BAS - but enough for us both to come into the conclusion that the Tupolev is indeed flawed in many ways that may well influence the incidence at the paris airshow. However, the source, PBS - a well-trusted source that covered the incident provided evidence, and I am simply using that to support the opinion.
I try to keep an open minded approach to incidents like this and see the reasoning of both sides of the argument. Thanks for sharing the information.
@CRJ900Pilot Not really tips. Its just through lots of math and practice. I might make a video explaining the math soon. I streamed quite a bit over the weekend on doing the wings, not sure if that helped.
@jamesPLANESii idk. its at 1200 parts and not even started on cockpit yet.
@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD Yeah, why might you ask?
@CRJ900Pilot Unfortunately not. These wings takes hours upon hours to complete - and i dont have that much free time on my hands.
@InternationalAircraftCompany yes comrade!
@Kevinairlines no. it is completely safe to use.
I’ve also found that out while building my E-fan almost a year ago, but it never worked in my favour and would do some glitchy things during level flight. I ended up abandoning it. @EternalDarkness
Eyy I used over too, before I got a pc. @Authros
@QingyuZhou Units - by mushro0m
@Davisplanez 1800-2500
@Davisplanez 1478
If you wanna do a 3-way collab with MrSilverwolf and I on the MI-26, we'll be more than happy do do so. I got the swashplate and tail rotor done a few months ago but we never got to the fuselage due to a corrupt save file that has been recently fixed.
@SledDriver Yeah, I like them a lot. The shapes and flight characteristics are fun to play around with and learned quite a lot from your builds.
@PancakeAddiction calls in winston
switches to moira
@Franticmatty k. ill send u a 3D model then. It's 1 part.
@PancakeAddiction Mada mada
@QingyuZhou No problem my dude!
3.
OOF. This thing is ugly. Why cant you have a vulcan challenge? xD
Very precarpathic...
That’s good to hear you have a reliable network. All we have here are CNN (retarded) and CTV/CBC (even more retarded). @EternalDarkness
@jamesPLANESii
I mean, thats basically enough, plus some trial and error. Most of the things you're dealing with in an airfoil has a right angle somewhere to reference off of anyways.
I go more in depth to make sure its smooth, but often times trial and error is enough to do that.
@Dalpaca5 ...
...
s p i c y
@PancakeAddiction haha
@PancakeAddiction
As an ana and zen main - especially when I play ana, I wanna smash ur face when u ask for healing while jumping all over the place. xD
Nice car tho
Mada mada. Still need healing?
(I can’t help it after looking at your profile pic xd)
R.C.
BaconAircraft
(Idk if this counts as medium or heavy - Drone (Phantom 3, Inspire 1))
No.
@Strikefighter04 I have a right to express my opinion - and that is this is getting rather spammy.
@BaconEggs lol
Rip. So if you were to accelerate retrograde for 10 seconds at 600m/s^2 and just turn off the engines, it would complete an orbit without falling into the atmosphere? Lol @BaconEggs
Wow nice
@TheMutePaper Actually it stands for
T - skidaddle
S - skidoodle
A - your aircraft
D - is now a noodle
Download TSAD software.
How does the orbital mechanics work in elite? Is it aerodynamic space or does it actually factor in continuous momentum when making a maneuver? (e.g. if you chase after a guy in retrograde motion, would you deorbit yourself?)
Wow nice
Make it a variable geometry supersonic cargo/airliner.
In my opinion (in which you’d happily deny) I found the US builds entertaining on its own, however you simply cannot compare the magnitude taken when comparing it to the British version. The builds itself were merely based on the ideas of the predecessor and sparked no new innnovative designs. However, a few of the builds were quite original.
@CoBros2
They didn’t have any creative vehicles either. 90% of which had been previously done by the British trio, and heck even the episodes were mere identical interns of content. My point is tp Imply there’s absolutely no creativity by just rebuilding a weather be a vehicle, a challenge or a “special” that had been previously done by the British counterpart. @CoBros2
This whole time I’ve been trying to tell you how there’s barely any creativity in the US version and you’d simply deny and deny the fact over and over again. @CoBros2
@CoBros2 if I recall correctly, you initiated it by calling the Us version more creative.
...hmm I wonder where the US top gear went. Oh wait! It’s cancelled. @CoBros2
I’m not even ganna bother continuing this arguement. Trying to present something to your stubborn self is as difficult as the trying to make top gear a good show again. I have no idea why you think the show is worse because of the cast’s actions rather than cinematic content. If I recall correctly, you did emphasize on how the US’ show has better content.
@CoBros2
they made hundreds of offensive and rather hilarious jokes throughout the years that landed them in hot water. The gone too far with on of their more recent ones. @CoBros2
Is it now? Furthermore proves how top gear is failing without Clarkson Hammond and may. @MrSilverWolf