This It aint cessna but make it cessna... put fairing on it and call it some wacky 1960s marketing term like "omni-dampen" or "land-o-matic" and for the fairing call it "speed-cap" or something along the lines.
@InternationalAircraftCompany Da comrade, we apologize for our mistake in our title. We promise in the name of our glorious motherland such atrocity will not happen again.
@jamesPLANESii sorry forgot to respond Your paneling skills are incredible. How do you do it so seamlessly omg
You know how? TSAD software. definitely /s
Nah incremental cross section build up every few feet and paneling one section at a time. Painfully long, but results are very favourable.
Here's some incremental steps:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/F92M7s/Cessna-172H-Wireframe-1-0
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/wxtdPX/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1LiEyz/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/u6l1pT/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/zTgXM4/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Qcbx4j/Cessna-172H-Tail
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/uBy627/Cessna-172H-Airframe
@SouthTunnel because for one to become one with the yeet, one must master the yeet, and thus for one to master the yeet, one must become one with the yeet; or one must be yoten.
This gives me PTSD from war thunder.
If your playing against the Soviet and you see a BT-5 J out in the first 2 min after capping a point, you know a Pe-8 with a 5000kg nuke is coming with your name on it.
@Thecatbaron Yeah. Go ahead. I warned in the description tho that it isn't totally accurate or realistic, as for SP we had to either model it off airspeed or AoA, and not a combination of both.
@Thecatbaron Indeed. I do agree, from what MrSilverwolf has been telling me, under-sensitive is the case. However, we tuned down the sensitivity because we wanted something that would resemble the flying by a sane person who doesn't over-G the airframe.
I do understand your point though, incase you want to change it, here's a few things you can edit to make it more sensitive.
- On the horizontal stabilizer, there are 2 rotators on either side. The innermost on both is correspondent to pitch.
- Inside the horizontal stabilizer, the wing has 1 control surface on either side.
^
Change clamp01((400 / (abs(IAS) + 200)) - 1) * Pitch to just Pitch.
Can't help but bother putting it in here. Maus Haus
+3This It aint cessna but make it cessna... put fairing on it and call it some wacky 1960s marketing term like "omni-dampen" or "land-o-matic" and for the fairing call it "speed-cap" or something along the lines.
+2Ching chong ur helicopters be launched.
@SupremeDorian Ye virgins and your star destroyers. Chads put the whole death star on it. Bruh
STRONK)))))
Funky.
@QingyuZhou it runs off 100% glorious people's vodka. da, da clean energy yes. good for motherland.
+1@whereby Because its not done.... who could have thought!?!?
@whereby Because its not done.... who could have thought!?!?
No @whereby
Lmao Sherman’s and M10s are free food. @CaptainEssen
+4Yes @Bennet23
@Fartspoppop
Oh. That’s neat. @Khanskaya
Yes @AerialFighterSnakes
T what @Fartspoppop
Ah thanks. Is that the default for YouTube now? Interesting. @Khanskaya
@AerialFighterSnakes
+1"Comments on the video have been disabled by YouTube to protect minors."
Apparently the IL-76 isn't appropriate...
@Pulkit beacons must taste terrible
@Brields95 Yes'nt
@InternationalAircraftCompany Da comrade, we apologize for our mistake in our title. We promise in the name of our glorious motherland such atrocity will not happen again.
+4Best of luck comrade. Best wishes to your health. You will get through this. Stay strong.
+3@AircraftoftheRedStar da
+1Blyat blin bloody brilliant.
Gaijibbles plz add 6.7 premium.
@ForeverPie Thanks, I hate it.
+1@jamesPLANESii than it must be the tsad software :thinking:
+1@jamesPLANESii sorry forgot to respond
+1Your paneling skills are incredible. How do you do it so seamlessly omg
You know how? TSAD software. definitely /s
Nah incremental cross section build up every few feet and paneling one section at a time. Painfully long, but results are very favourable.
Here's some incremental steps:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/F92M7s/Cessna-172H-Wireframe-1-0
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/wxtdPX/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1LiEyz/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/u6l1pT/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/zTgXM4/Cessna-172H-Fuselage-Panel
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Qcbx4j/Cessna-172H-Tail
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/uBy627/Cessna-172H-Airframe
@SouthTunnel because for one to become one with the yeet, one must master the yeet, and thus for one to master the yeet, one must become one with the yeet; or one must be yoten.
Blyat. Mfw I can't spotlight it because comrade has more points than me.
+1@Bthom9090 mU rI cA oNl Y cO uNtrY iN tHe WorL d
+1I was thinking of OH-COK actually.
Read the description. All you had to do was press 1 and 2 to not miss the best part. :)
+1https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-patent-shows-plans-for-a-ridiculous-flying-ak-47-drone-2019-3
@teodor99 I'm ganna pretend I don't use the Ju-288.
This gives me PTSD from war thunder.
+1If your playing against the Soviet and you see a BT-5 J out in the first 2 min after capping a point, you know a Pe-8 with a 5000kg nuke is coming with your name on it.
Somewhat mobile friendly variant with half the exterior detail and no interior details:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/p2k2Wc/Cessna-172S-Reduced-Partcount
@Fighterpilot91 Heh. Started work on this almost a year and a half ago. I don't have too much time on my games.
+2@Kweed10 In an hour? Idk. Working on them rn.
+1@Thecatbaron Yeah. Go ahead. I warned in the description tho that it isn't totally accurate or realistic, as for SP we had to either model it off airspeed or AoA, and not a combination of both.
@Thecatbaron Indeed. I do agree, from what MrSilverwolf has been telling me, under-sensitive is the case. However, we tuned down the sensitivity because we wanted something that would resemble the flying by a sane person who doesn't over-G the airframe.
I do understand your point though, incase you want to change it, here's a few things you can edit to make it more sensitive.
- On the horizontal stabilizer, there are 2 rotators on either side. The innermost on both is correspondent to pitch.
- Inside the horizontal stabilizer, the wing has 1 control surface on either side.
^
Change clamp01((400 / (abs(IAS) + 200)) - 1) * Pitch to just Pitch.
@Gameboi14 What other thing? heh
@Gameboi14 Lol I messed up a screenshot. You saw nothing.
@Gameboi14 ja.
Cute chonker
+1@Gameboi14 no. comrade it is of sekrit dokument.
@Gameboi14 no time, no motivation, project is 2 years old and i think it sucks.
@Gameboi14 hahahhahah. no.
@Armyguy1534 A nice person pointed out the trim wheel yeets out of the plane when you put down trim
@jamesPLANESii Hmm gimme an input for it. I'll try it out and ask wolf about it.
@jamesPLANESii but thats not how the 172's stall horn works. Ask wolf about that.
+1lmfao nice