During construction, I accumulated a lot of screenshots. These are not all of them. So I decided: "Shouldn't I do something with them?" You can see the results here.
@tucan It's just that the outcome of my vote depends on whether it hovers, or flies normally. If it hangs in place, it wins the hellkeska, and if it flies normally, I'm betting on the Harrier.
1) Su - 30SM
2) Pigpen
3) Harrier(Changed to Hellkeska.)
4) Pigpen
5) It's complicated. Both have chances. A lot depends on randomness... I'll bet on the Su-30SM. It's random.
1) First fight - I bet on SU.
Cannons are useless on these planes - it all depends on missiles and turn rate. And bots don't dodge missiles. It all depends on target acquisition time and missile speed. I believe the SU will be better at this.
2) The Wasp is a strike fighter, and the Pigpen is more maneuverable. The reason is the same as the first time, it has better maneuverability.
3) The Harrier is at least a bit of a fighter, while the Hellkeska is a bomber. I think the choice is obvious.
(UPD.) I thought about it and realized that the bot wouldn't be able to control the Harrier properly and would make it a perfect target.Then the hellkeska would win.
4) Pigpen is a stronger fighter than Harrier. I'm betting on him.
5) Here I don't know. It's complicated. In terms of basic characteristics, both aren't bad. I really don't know who to bet on. But I'm going to go with Su and random.
@FlyingPatriot
@Falco7
@RYZ3NCHR1ST3NS3N
@ZeroWithSlashedO
@Bobyo
Nice!
Um, what changes did you make?
Hmm...
Oh sh...
It's cool...
TAG ME!!!
Yes.
@Aviationcheesesticks NP
200 parts SU
@SlimSimpy
Rickroll at the plate...
@Vulorian SU-57 *
The HUD looks very familiar... Do you know who you got it from? ;)
@JuanNotAnAlt thx
@X99STRIKER no, CD card somehow was damaged. There is no help here.
@kolopatch
?
Ты просил тэг.
Т
@JustMiko no, mix of MiG, SU and some more from myself.
Brick
@GuyFolk
You may notice that in creating my SU, I collected a whole collection of others from various users. Yours is in it, too. ;)
@MrShenanigans It's too hard to explain through commentary.
During construction, I accumulated a lot of screenshots. These are not all of them. So I decided: "Shouldn't I do something with them?" You can see the results here.
T
@GuyFolk Oh hey. What score out of 100 can you give this plane? ;)
@IceCraftGaming
It is out already.
Link here
@Lerkov1991 It's going to be hard... It will take a long time. I don't know if I can ...
T
@SiCorSky what is wrong?
@T57HEAVY
@LarryTad
@ayou2005
@JustMiko
@Xamesria27
@TatsuTheOtaku
I can't say for sure. I need screenshots and a description. The planned date is Monday evening (GMT) .@T57HEAVY
@tucan It's just that the outcome of my vote depends on whether it hovers, or flies normally. If it hangs in place, it wins the hellkeska, and if it flies normally, I'm betting on the Harrier.
1) Su - 30SM
2) Pigpen
3) Harrier(Changed to Hellkeska.)
4) Pigpen
5) It's complicated. Both have chances. A lot depends on randomness... I'll bet on the Su-30SM. It's random.
1) First fight - I bet on SU.
Cannons are useless on these planes - it all depends on missiles and turn rate. And bots don't dodge missiles. It all depends on target acquisition time and missile speed. I believe the SU will be better at this.
2) The Wasp is a strike fighter, and the Pigpen is more maneuverable. The reason is the same as the first time, it has better maneuverability.
3) The Harrier is at least a bit of a fighter, while the Hellkeska is a bomber. I think the choice is obvious.
(UPD.) I thought about it and realized that the bot wouldn't be able to control the Harrier properly and would make it a perfect target.Then the hellkeska would win.
4) Pigpen is a stronger fighter than Harrier. I'm betting on him.
5) Here I don't know. It's complicated. In terms of basic characteristics, both aren't bad. I really don't know who to bet on. But I'm going to go with Su and random.
Т
@BangRou This is just for the test. Then all will have a different input.
T
@V1PER5 First, make sure you switch to the camera and not the cockpit.
He is obligated to work. If you don't notice it, maybe the flight speed or turn rate is too low for a noticeable effect.
@tsampoy Yes. Last...
2-nd teaser
@Griffon1
@TheHaggisBasher
@PSsyalperdna
@LaylaSP1
@MuizTheMobileFriendly
@TatsuTheOtaku
1-st teaser.
@LieutenantSOT
@AWESOMENESS360
@3
And, yes. I'm back, but not completely.
@One2
@Red0Bulll
?
oh...
T
@Clutch Sorry. My mistake. Already done.
@KobzeR No, fictional, but based on.
@FlyingPatriot
Этот совет сродни "Нет денег на хлеб? Ешьте пирожные!"
Хотя тут есть разница. ПК у меня есть. Но на нём нет СП.
@EchoWhiskey11 OK. Why no?
You shouldn't have made such a teaser. I now want to repeat after you...
I am fast.