@Dragoranos
Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
@MrGreen
Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@xNotDumb
I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@JustLookingForFriends
Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
The diagonal placement of the machine gun is well done. The coloring is also beautiful. It is an interesting idea to link the machine gun with the gyroscope. Good work!
@Lamialover
Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I build a variety of planes, but I also build planes that are a little less well known.
I will consider the J2M5 as a candidate the next time I make a Japanese military aircraft.
By the way, as a Japanese, I must say that the J2M5 "Raiden" may not be well known worldwide, but it is a very popular aircraft among Japanese aviation fans.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your compliments and appreciation. You compliment me a little too much and I am embarrassed.
There are many players of this game who create amazing works. I hope you will enjoy the works of various players and vote in favor of them. I will do the same.
@JustLookingForFriends
@Bryan5
OK, I'll make both.
I guess it will take some time. I don't know if I can make a good piece... both have great builders making awesome pieces.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your comment. I am so glad you like my work.
As you pointed out, my work is not that focused on the interior. My playing environment is mobile, so it is very difficult to do detailed modeling. Also, hydraulic related equipment and such would not make much sense to recreate in this game. Plus I am a bit lazy.
I will try my best to make good works in the future, and I will consider WW2 jets as a candidate for my work.
@JustLookingForFriends
Tei-type....It's a model with a diagonally placed machine gun. It's fine. Don't forget to remove the machine gun under the fuselage.
@Bryan5
@JustLookingForFriends
Thanks for the suggestion. Of these, I personally would like to make the P-51. Well, I may make a different one depending on my mood...is it the D model that you want me to make?
@JustLookingForFriends
In fact, the J1N2 "Irving" is an aircraft that I was not sure which one to build with this "Toryu". I would like to build a U.S. military aircraft next, so I will not build it right now, but I would like to build it someday.
@Bryan5
Thanks a lot!
Me-262...well, I like this airplane very much, but it seems to be difficult how to make that unique triangular fuselage cross section shape....
I'll try it out and upload it when I can make something I'm satisfied with.
Oh, of course, I know what the Me-262 Schwalbe is, lol.
@PapaKernels
Thanks for the advice! I will try to see what kind of flying model I can get with the wing shape as it is on the actual aircraft.
Thanks. Your A-3 looks nice and realistic with the timing of the landing gear folding :)
@Siapaaku8897
Thank you for pointing out the bug.
After verifying various situations, I have found that when "Settings" -> "Game Quality" -> "Physics" is set to "Low", high G maneuvers cause the wing parts of the elevator to unjoin and cause abnormal vibrations. (It looks like this picture)
I reviewed the joints of the parts and updated the xml file. Still, it was not completely resolved.
Sorry, but please set "physics" to "medium" or higher when flying.
@Ihavejellybeans
Thanks for your comment.
Are you referring to the F2G? The original F4U has a distinctive inverted gull wing and I would like to make one someday :)
@Bryan5
Thank you for your comment.
I am not confident that I can make a good Bf109, as various builders have done excellent work on it. However, I have a work that I plan to submit in the future, and I will consider Bf109 as a work to be made after that.
@JustDragon
@Kangy
@Kittyhawk208
@Oxen
Thank you for your comments.
I will continue to do my best to create good works.
By the way, I have been working on this piece from the beginning. This is the first time I submitted it.
@DESMONTHEWOLFIE
@Dragorans
@Bryan5
Thank you for your comments.
I am glad you like it. I think there are still some improvements to be made to the wing folding, which I will work on in the future.
@MrGreen
+3Aah! So that's what the name means! I think it is a wonderful name to honor the brave Jevadaiah. He even went to the ISS recently :)
@Dragoranos
+2Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
As someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I give you the upvote.
+2@MrGreen
+4Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for getting back to me.
Uh...I may have misunderstood the intent of your statement. My apologies.
@xNotDumb
+2I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
+2Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@Kangy
+2Thank you for your comment!
@vcharng
Excuse my abrupt comment.
May I use the Funky Tree formula used in your "1.9.203 funky trees demonstrator" below for the plane I am building?
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you for your comment.
No problem, you may use the machine gun mount section.
The diagonal placement of the machine gun is well done. The coloring is also beautiful. It is an interesting idea to link the machine gun with the gyroscope. Good work!
@Lamialover
+1Thank you! :)
@Lamialover
+1Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I build a variety of planes, but I also build planes that are a little less well known.
I will consider the J2M5 as a candidate the next time I make a Japanese military aircraft.
By the way, as a Japanese, I must say that the J2M5 "Raiden" may not be well known worldwide, but it is a very popular aircraft among Japanese aviation fans.
@Killer123562
+2Thank you for your compliments and appreciation. You compliment me a little too much and I am embarrassed.
There are many players of this game who create amazing works. I hope you will enjoy the works of various players and vote in favor of them. I will do the same.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1@Bryan5
OK, I'll make both.
I guess it will take some time. I don't know if I can make a good piece... both have great builders making awesome pieces.
@Killer123562
+1Thank you for your comment. I am so glad you like my work.
As you pointed out, my work is not that focused on the interior. My playing environment is mobile, so it is very difficult to do detailed modeling. Also, hydraulic related equipment and such would not make much sense to recreate in this game. Plus I am a bit lazy.
I will try my best to make good works in the future, and I will consider WW2 jets as a candidate for my work.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Tei-type....It's a model with a diagonally placed machine gun. It's fine. Don't forget to remove the machine gun under the fuselage.
@Bryan5
+1@JustLookingForFriends
Thanks for the suggestion. Of these, I personally would like to make the P-51. Well, I may make a different one depending on my mood...is it the D model that you want me to make?
@dINE
+1Thank you!
@JustLookingForFriends
+1In fact, the J1N2 "Irving" is an aircraft that I was not sure which one to build with this "Toryu". I would like to build a U.S. military aircraft next, so I will not build it right now, but I would like to build it someday.
@99807
+2Thank you! I'm glad you like it.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thanks for your comment.Doitashimashite.
@Rompuss62
+1Thank you!
@SyntheticL
+3Thank you for your comments.
I see! I never played War Thunder, so I didn't know that, but it is a tough one to make enemies with.
@Bryan5
+1Thanks a lot!
Me-262...well, I like this airplane very much, but it seems to be difficult how to make that unique triangular fuselage cross section shape....
I'll try it out and upload it when I can make something I'm satisfied with.
Oh, of course, I know what the Me-262 Schwalbe is, lol.
@Kangy
+2Thanks for the advice!
I will try different things in SP to see how the flight characteristics change depending on the wing shape.
@PapaKernels
+2Thanks for the advice! I will try to see what kind of flying model I can get with the wing shape as it is on the actual aircraft.
Thanks. Your A-3 looks nice and realistic with the timing of the landing gear folding :)
@Kangy
+2Thank you!
...I always wonder how much maneuverability I should have in my aircraft.... I will look into it and try it out in the future.
@MulletMan001
+1Thank you!!
@Siapaaku8897
+1Thank you for pointing out the bug.
After verifying various situations, I have found that when "Settings" -> "Game Quality" -> "Physics" is set to "Low", high G maneuvers cause the wing parts of the elevator to unjoin and cause abnormal vibrations. (It looks like this picture)
I reviewed the joints of the parts and updated the xml file. Still, it was not completely resolved.
Sorry, but please set "physics" to "medium" or higher when flying.
@Siapaaku8897
+1What kind of bug? I thought there was no problem as far as I tried it...?
@Metaa
+1Oh my...sorry about our timing together. Looking forward to your Tiger Ⅰ.
@Ihavejellybeans
+1Thanks!
@GrentonAircraftCo
+2Thanks for letting me know. I have added in the description section that you flew this plane in VR.
@SimplyPlain
+2Thanks for the comment! Glad you like it :)
@Alisuchanka
+2Thank you! Indeed. But I think your modeling and painting is far more beautiful and realistic :)
@TatsuTheOtaku
+2@JuliusCeasor98
Thanks!
@GrentonAircraftCo
Thanks for the comment. As beenz said, I don't know if this will work in VR. Sorry.
@Bryan5
+1Thank you so much!! This was a difficult and good practice assignment. I hope you like it.
@MrShenanigansSP
+1Thanks!!
@Ihavejellybeans
+1Thanks for your comment.
Are you referring to the F2G? The original F4U has a distinctive inverted gull wing and I would like to make one someday :)
@Dragorans
+1Thanks.
Hmmm, I don't think platinum in 20 days is indeed impossible... lol I will try my best to become it someday.
@CheckOneTwo
+2Thanks for your comment!
@Bryan5
+1Thank you for your comment.
I am not confident that I can make a good Bf109, as various builders have done excellent work on it. However, I have a work that I plan to submit in the future, and I will consider Bf109 as a work to be made after that.
@Scottydoestuff
+1@DashEight
Thank you for your comments.I am glad you like it.
@JustDragon
+2@Kangy
@Kittyhawk208
@Oxen
Thank you for your comments.
I will continue to do my best to create good works.
By the way, I have been working on this piece from the beginning. This is the first time I submitted it.
@DESMONTHEWOLFIE
+1@Dragorans
@Bryan5
Thank you for your comments.
I am glad you like it. I think there are still some improvements to be made to the wing folding, which I will work on in the future.