Nope. This is PC. You forget that I am creating this exactly according to the blueprints. The triangle method also slays time. This is also a very very hard aircraft to create because of its unique wing shape.
@SgtRXMT
I might need an extension, but I don’t know. I will let you know if I need one. My progress is coming along great. I have the fuselage and wing roots and half of the engines done. Just the other two jets, the wings, landing gear, and bombs left.
I might not do this after all because I suck terribly at making fictional stuff. If you haven't noticed, the aircraft I make are mostly paper projects, so I give them a twist into how they probably would look like in service.
@captainhall
I will do it, but on two conditions! I STRONGLY suggest changing some of the requirements.
First of all, "at least one forward facing armament" is extremely limiting considering that the Tu-16 was basically one of the only bombers with a fixed forward firing gun. I don't fancy building well-known aircraft, so this practically eliminates 97% of options I could build for this challenge. Also does this apply to forward facing turrets? What if my bomber only has a single tail turret for armament? I suggest changing this to "at least two pieces of defensive armament".
The other one I recommend is the max part count. With my very recently posted Tupolev 'Project 489', I have entered the region of accurate planes. I don't feel very comfortable making a replica with less than 500 parts, and and 600 part cap limit would make things more comfortable for me.
@captainhall
I recommend checking through my aircraft. Since the planes I make rarely have landing gear shown in the blueprints, I have to invent it myself which means I keep it pretty simple. @markplane
Np man!
@qwerty132
Nope. This is PC. You forget that I am creating this exactly according to the blueprints. The triangle method also slays time. This is also a very very hard aircraft to create because of its unique wing shape.
@SgtRXMT
For the challenge.
@captainhall
Does it count as being rickrolled when the page loads up but he video doesn't play?
Sure! How many parts?
@ACEPILOT109
That looks sooooo GOOD!!
Sure I’ll see what I can do.
@Shaini
Here’s #70 from m. Also nice to see you back!
Thank you for #69!
@ThePropellerIsAFan
I tried looking for milk as well, but all I found was soup.
OH MY GOODNESS
I like how my screenshots turned out!
Platinum level of points where the color behind your point counter turns black.@jelybaca
Congrats on reach platinum!!
I might need an extension, but I don’t know. I will let you know if I need one. My progress is coming along great. I have the fuselage and wing roots and half of the engines done. Just the other two jets, the wings, landing gear, and bombs left.
Thanks for the spotlight!
@Notaleopard
C
I like it! This is cool!
time frame like 1956-59 or 1915-23
@ACEPILOT109
What would be your estimated time frame?
@ACEPILOT109
YES YES YES MY LIFE IS COMPLETE
Anywhere on the plane. I recommend it on the centerline with the aircraft and nudged into the fuselage so it can’t be seen.
@Bobofboblandia
That is actually super cool!
Have you cancelled the tournament? Or have you just been too busy to put together the results? No offense intended.
Such a beautiful “Harke”!!!
WOAH!!
Loool!
@ChisP
Excellent! I can’t wait to show you the finished product!
@captainhall
This is an amazing recreation! Fantastic job!!!
Thank you so much for #60 man!!!
@JettStorm
Woah!!!
I actually am in the same position as asteroidbook345. Mine is strictly a paper project; so much so that even a scale desktop model wasn’t produced.
WOAH
W👁W
Hey that’s pretty cool!
That looks awesome!!!
Yes lol.
@Hedero
This boi has more time on his hands than a bored goldfish.
Np man!
@asteroidbook345
What map mod is that?
I'm going to make a Myasishchev paper project from 1952. And a video teaser about it when it's done.
Aw yeah!!!
@F104Deathtrap
They have been in service since the 80’s my boi with several updates to them up until today.
@asteroidbook345
Lol thanks man!
@r1Username
I can’t decide whether to make a medium bomber relatively equal to the Tu-16, or a heavy bomber project.
@captainhall
I might not do this after all because I suck terribly at making fictional stuff. If you haven't noticed, the aircraft I make are mostly paper projects, so I give them a twist into how they probably would look like in service.
@captainhall
I will do it, but on two conditions! I STRONGLY suggest changing some of the requirements.
First of all, "at least one forward facing armament" is extremely limiting considering that the Tu-16 was basically one of the only bombers with a fixed forward firing gun. I don't fancy building well-known aircraft, so this practically eliminates 97% of options I could build for this challenge. Also does this apply to forward facing turrets? What if my bomber only has a single tail turret for armament? I suggest changing this to "at least two pieces of defensive armament".
The other one I recommend is the max part count. With my very recently posted Tupolev 'Project 489', I have entered the region of accurate planes. I don't feel very comfortable making a replica with less than 500 parts, and and 600 part cap limit would make things more comfortable for me.
@captainhall
I recommend checking through my aircraft. Since the planes I make rarely have landing gear shown in the blueprints, I have to invent it myself which means I keep it pretty simple. @markplane
T
Are you able to handle it? Cause I’m barely able to lol.
@Nuclearbomber36