@P0TTYR0CKET you’re welcome, one question I have though, how come it can pitch up when completely stopped, and it almost has a sense of thrust vectoring when it does so at low speeds?
@6pan actually, there’s several reasons:
• When it was first posted, it was completely revolutionary, as it had an unfathomable amount of detail compared to most, if not every other aircraft before it, such as;
- 3D wing structure
- detailed cockpit
- surprisingly accurate details and design, in comparison to the actual P-51D-30.
- custom landing gear
- lots of other features that are common today, but rarely ever seen back when this was posted
This thing is astonishingly easy to land, and it looks absolutely beautiful. Amazing work here, you deserve so much more points than you’ve already gotten from this!
@MintLynx the moment we discovered nukes, it all went downhill from there. Kinda funny how that’s almost the same with real life, without regulations and rules, this earth would be a scorched radioactive hellscape.
Hey Squirrel, I was wondering if I could have permission to use one of these, and two of the AS-AC-10 Apocalypse Class Aircraft Carriers in a fictional military I’m creating, is that ok or are they yours to use only?
@MRpingouin ok first of all, don’t beg people for upvotes and spotlights, that isn’t typically seen as ok. Second of all, I can choose what I want to spotlight, I’m sure another user will spotlight it themselves. (also I hit my limit today too lol) and third of all, it’s better if you don’t expect much from builds, cause if/when you do get a lot of attention on them, you’ll be happily surprised, and that alone can inspire you to make even more, possibly better creations.
@KnightOfRen cause of all my controversial forum posts about SP Drama, for instance, the German Corsair post, and the post I made about you a while ago. I just have a feeling that the moderators have a few hotkeys for banning certain users, and I’m on the list.
Is nobody reading the part of the description where I tell them to scale this creation by a factor of 10? Use the goddamn finetuner mod and scale this thing up you degenerates.
@Learpot scale the entire craft by a power of 10, and it doesn’t wobble any more. It’s supposed be 10 times larger than it is now, I’ve just scaled it down to 0.1 percent of its actual size, for ease of editing.
If you could open up those windows when they were stuck in that weird locked position, you were automatically the strongest kid on the school bus, and that’s a fact.
@AzureCorp john I require wingspan
@P0TTYR0CKET ahh ok, makes sense.
@P0TTYR0CKET you’re welcome, one question I have though, how come it can pitch up when completely stopped, and it almost has a sense of thrust vectoring when it does so at low speeds?
+1Looks awesome!
What’s the size of this thing?
@AzureCorp we’ll see about that.
@Xml_ was I complaining?
The agility is strong in this one
+1@rexrexThezion it’s the only post I’m following lol
+4How to make a link:
[put whatever text you want here](paste in the link here)
Use the brackets and parentheses as shown!
@6pan actually, there’s several reasons:
+3• When it was first posted, it was completely revolutionary, as it had an unfathomable amount of detail compared to most, if not every other aircraft before it, such as;
- 3D wing structure
- detailed cockpit
- surprisingly accurate details and design, in comparison to the actual P-51D-30.
- custom landing gear
- lots of other features that are common today, but rarely ever seen back when this was posted
If you go to the tags option when editing them, there’s actually a toy tag you can use, so then your builds can get even more potential attention!
We can’t see your graphs, only a small square.
@Highground “ain’t gonna sink this battleship, no way.”
+404:47 has me laughing so hard
Can we have links to each of the crafts used if possible?
This thing is astonishingly easy to land, and it looks absolutely beautiful. Amazing work here, you deserve so much more points than you’ve already gotten from this!
@HeathMathews yeah I guess it just works like that sometimes
+1Alright that’s enough SP for one day...
+1@JDog3106 you heard the man, it’s just like a sand
Chills Will Be Sent Down Your Spine.
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
@MintLynx the moment we discovered nukes, it all went downhill from there. Kinda funny how that’s almost the same with real life, without regulations and rules, this earth would be a scorched radioactive hellscape.
+3@PropellerPropellerTheFan not exactly, but thanks anyway
Hey Squirrel, I was wondering if I could have permission to use one of these, and two of the AS-AC-10 Apocalypse Class Aircraft Carriers in a fictional military I’m creating, is that ok or are they yours to use only?
Woah, that’s two challenges I’ve won in a row, what’s happening to me?
I guess I should feel honored to be your test bed?
Looks interesting, although the yaw is inverted, and it has a large rightwards autoroll. Flight model could be better, but otherwise, flies ok.
This is very good for your first build, nice work!
That final moment at the end where pieces of YourWife’s Aegis Ship we’re flying across the screen was priceless
+1@soundwave BAZOING
+1TONGUE FLOPS OUT OF MOUTH DRENCHJNF EVEEYHRING IN SIGHT
WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOO FKOWDKKEWK
Pretty cool design, but the flight characteristics aren’t the best.
“Let’s drop some lead on these motherf-“
+2”FIRE!!”
cue the 16in. Naval Cannons
This becomes 100x funnier when you notice the broken prop blades on the ground
+3@Kimfri Apparently the new trend is barely recognizable little beans that may or may not screw over their friends.
+1(Among Us & Fall Guys)
@tsampoy it was my birthday 23 days ago
@MRpingouin ok then
@MRpingouin ok first of all, don’t beg people for upvotes and spotlights, that isn’t typically seen as ok. Second of all, I can choose what I want to spotlight, I’m sure another user will spotlight it themselves. (also I hit my limit today too lol) and third of all, it’s better if you don’t expect much from builds, cause if/when you do get a lot of attention on them, you’ll be happily surprised, and that alone can inspire you to make even more, possibly better creations.
Not bad
@KnightOfRen cause of all my controversial forum posts about SP Drama, for instance, the German Corsair post, and the post I made about you a while ago. I just have a feeling that the moderators have a few hotkeys for banning certain users, and I’m on the list.
@KnightOfRen they’d delete quick cause I’m pretty sure I’m generally hated by the moderators of this website lol
What the hell has this website become
+1Woah! That never happens!
@Learpot practice.
Is nobody reading the part of the description where I tell them to scale this creation by a factor of 10? Use the goddamn finetuner mod and scale this thing up you degenerates.
@Nerfaddict no, I’m challenging SP Physics lmfao
@BagelPlane mass scale for all pylons is 1, so there’s nothing I can do about that.
@Learpot scale the entire craft by a power of 10, and it doesn’t wobble any more. It’s supposed be 10 times larger than it is now, I’ve just scaled it down to 0.1 percent of its actual size, for ease of editing.
@EternalDarkness
@Squirrel
@Blue0Bull
Give it way too many Cleavers that have 0 lock time, 360° lock radius, and ridiculously fast engines and/or maneuverability.
If you could open up those windows when they were stuck in that weird locked position, you were automatically the strongest kid on the school bus, and that’s a fact.