@MTakach lol, I’ve definitely noticed that there’s quite a few of them on the website, especially the SR2 website fsr. And honestly I don’t really care, like I’m not gonna shame someone for what they like, cause I too have been shamed for what I like, and I know how it feels. I guess it would seem that the majority of the website has the same mindset as well.
@lilsniper334
@lilsniper333
Ok so uhh
I’m only now just seeing this and I have several questions, and I don’t want to sound all whinny and complainy and all, but...
1. 2nd placeman even said my entry was “multitudes better than his”
2. Both you, and the challenge winner, have immensely similar usernames, which is extremely suspicious.
3. You said he has a very detailed description, yet the description I gave my creation is like 10x longer and more detailed than their’s?
4. Sure mine isn’t exactly as post apocalyptic in looks, but you have to at least admit that mine has so much more work put into it, at 1,300 parts, meanwhile the other creation, while it’s still very nice, it only has like a third of the parts that mine does.
6. Bruh
7. Like seriously, I’m actually kinda hurt that the other creation won, like I wasn’t expecting to win at all, but to be beaten by, well, that, that’s kinda hurtful, as if it voids all my hard work.
8. Did you notice I skipped number five?
@rexzion many small solids in one spot can work together to mimic a liquid, sorta like if you filled a swimming pool with orbeez; it’s not completely reminiscent of a true liquid, but it resembles one enough to be the next best thing.
@Lettuce I could size it down, but then the flares wouldn’t fit inside of the rocket, which kinda voids the purpose of the creation, as it’s supposed to be a firework.
@Greggory005 contrary to your belief, for some reason, rage faces from like 2012 seem to be making a slight comeback in recent memes. Idk why, but I can’t complain. :)
@SyntheticL huh, well that’s just screwy. I guess it isn’t a total loss though, I can probably use IbisPaint or something and make it look like it’s underwater in a normal screenshot.
I love this idea, but this is also why I make Yoke FCS in cockpits. They just look nicer than a flight stick FCS when I’m not replicating something for accuracy, and they’re easier to make IMO
Ok but his Roma Ship is actually really freaking good though? Like for under 500 parts, it’s really good looking and functionally sound. That too, I believe, is part of the reason why it has so many upvotes, because it has a relatively low part count, which allows more users to download it and run it on their device without lag, or atleast with minimal lag. I appreciate this a lot actually, as I used to play on an old IPad Mini, and I always saw so many amazing creations that were just too much for my IPad to handle, and I was always so jealous of the other users with the latest most powerful phone, or PC. But now that I have a more powerful device, I don’t need to worry about this as much. Still, I appreciate the build’s low part count, as building something that looks that good with a part count that, relatively, is kinda average for the website, is rather impressive in my book. That obviously doesn’t mean that the 1,000+ part count builds with ridiculous amounts of detail aren’t impressive, hell they're a lot more impressive than the lower part count builds. But that doesn’t mean we need to go off on the users who post primarily lower part count creations, especially if their build quality is as good looking and functioning as the builds above. Remember when you were a new user? Think back to your first creation. Was it as good as what you see here? I imagine it wasn’t, and in all honesty, it’s hard to say whether these are Under500’s actual first creations in SP, but if they are, they’re helluva lot more impressive than almost every user’s first creation.
@WiiWiiTheMini I can tell because it can accelerate underwater, pitch and roll are fluent, and it can easily surface if it needs to, indicating that it has the ability to “fly” underwater. I can also look at my altitude and speed, and I can tell that it’s powered as my speed is constant, and it can pull up easily without losing speed.
This is super cool, I love the cockpit and the overall design is great. One suggestion I will make, is to put more space in between the landing gear, they’re way too close together; you can search up images of early WWI and even WWII Biplanes, and you can see that they all share the common feature of relatively far-spaced landing gear, usually attached by a wing-like section in between the wheels. Also, your Flaps are inverted; I assume the control surfaces that move via the VTOL Slider are supposed to be flaps?
This would be a great way to make custom props that don’t use actual engines, I like the idea!
+1What is happening in this comment section
Let’s keep it at 1234, no more, no less!
+1THESE ARE AMAZING!!
Thicc
+1@Learpot
+4@DerpTheSoyacfartala
W H A T T H E F U C K A R E Y O U D O I N G
@MTakach lol, I’ve definitely noticed that there’s quite a few of them on the website, especially the SR2 website fsr. And honestly I don’t really care, like I’m not gonna shame someone for what they like, cause I too have been shamed for what I like, and I know how it feels. I guess it would seem that the majority of the website has the same mindset as well.
+1@Oreo2005 ah ok
This is really nice, those custom missiles are pretty impressive too!
Me when the
the
@Delightedman vodka.
+1It would taste like vodka.
@lilsniper333 alright then.
@lilsniper334
@lilsniper333
Ok so uhh
I’m only now just seeing this and I have several questions, and I don’t want to sound all whinny and complainy and all, but...
1. 2nd placeman even said my entry was “multitudes better than his”
2. Both you, and the challenge winner, have immensely similar usernames, which is extremely suspicious.
3. You said he has a very detailed description, yet the description I gave my creation is like 10x longer and more detailed than their’s?
4. Sure mine isn’t exactly as post apocalyptic in looks, but you have to at least admit that mine has so much more work put into it, at 1,300 parts, meanwhile the other creation, while it’s still very nice, it only has like a third of the parts that mine does.
6. Bruh
7. Like seriously, I’m actually kinda hurt that the other creation won, like I wasn’t expecting to win at all, but to be beaten by, well, that, that’s kinda hurtful, as if it voids all my hard work.
8. Did you notice I skipped number five?
@Cronvia32 you have 666pts lol
I was expecting a rick roll but got raw yam instead
T
If the Earth was flat,
Cats would’ve pushed everything off the edge by now.
+1@rexzion many small solids in one spot can work together to mimic a liquid, sorta like if you filled a swimming pool with orbeez; it’s not completely reminiscent of a true liquid, but it resembles one enough to be the next best thing.
@Lettuce I could size it down, but then the flares wouldn’t fit inside of the rocket, which kinda voids the purpose of the creation, as it’s supposed to be a firework.
@PapaKernels that’s the fun part!
Anemic Christmas Tree
+1@PapaKernels Cover Yourself In Oil
@WolfSpark I didn’t lol, you can check
A single 556 API Round would be enough to turn this into Hiroshima II Electric Boogaloo
@Greggory005 contrary to your belief, for some reason, rage faces from like 2012 seem to be making a slight comeback in recent memes. Idk why, but I can’t complain. :)
Woah this is so cool
Looks amazing, tag me when you post it!
@SonicManiaOVA ah ok lol, sorry for any confusion
+1Threeth
@SyntheticL huh, well that’s just screwy. I guess it isn’t a total loss though, I can probably use IbisPaint or something and make it look like it’s underwater in a normal screenshot.
+1@SyntheticL does it really not?
Aww Hell yeah this’ll be a good bathroom read when it explodes
Also cute cat lol
Nice job
I love how the only successor to this post is a build that’s literally cooking it, and it has like 10x the amount of upvotes lmao
+3Very nice!
Dang, this is a really strong suspension setup, nice job
+2First part of the video looked like an accurate representation of your average RyanAir flight
+4@DerpTheSoyacfartala gee I wonder why the submarine works underwater
Floiyeng Wæng
@Jerba drunken torpedo bomber pilots
Ooh that third one is pretty
@Grogu alrighty then
Woah that’s pretty cool, I guess you could say that those missiles had a bit of a...
Explosive Personality...
I love this idea, but this is also why I make Yoke FCS in cockpits. They just look nicer than a flight stick FCS when I’m not replicating something for accuracy, and they’re easier to make IMO
+2Ok but his Roma Ship is actually really freaking good though? Like for under 500 parts, it’s really good looking and functionally sound. That too, I believe, is part of the reason why it has so many upvotes, because it has a relatively low part count, which allows more users to download it and run it on their device without lag, or atleast with minimal lag. I appreciate this a lot actually, as I used to play on an old IPad Mini, and I always saw so many amazing creations that were just too much for my IPad to handle, and I was always so jealous of the other users with the latest most powerful phone, or PC. But now that I have a more powerful device, I don’t need to worry about this as much. Still, I appreciate the build’s low part count, as building something that looks that good with a part count that, relatively, is kinda average for the website, is rather impressive in my book. That obviously doesn’t mean that the 1,000+ part count builds with ridiculous amounts of detail aren’t impressive, hell they're a lot more impressive than the lower part count builds. But that doesn’t mean we need to go off on the users who post primarily lower part count creations, especially if their build quality is as good looking and functioning as the builds above. Remember when you were a new user? Think back to your first creation. Was it as good as what you see here? I imagine it wasn’t, and in all honesty, it’s hard to say whether these are Under500’s actual first creations in SP, but if they are, they’re helluva lot more impressive than almost every user’s first creation.
+5Huh that do be kinda weird
@WNP78
@WiiWiiTheMini do you want me to send you a video of the aircraft flying underwater for proof
@WiiWiiTheMini I can tell because it can accelerate underwater, pitch and roll are fluent, and it can easily surface if it needs to, indicating that it has the ability to “fly” underwater. I can also look at my altitude and speed, and I can tell that it’s powered as my speed is constant, and it can pull up easily without losing speed.
@WiiWiiTheMini what’s so confusing?
This is super cool, I love the cockpit and the overall design is great. One suggestion I will make, is to put more space in between the landing gear, they’re way too close together; you can search up images of early WWI and even WWII Biplanes, and you can see that they all share the common feature of relatively far-spaced landing gear, usually attached by a wing-like section in between the wheels. Also, your Flaps are inverted; I assume the control surfaces that move via the VTOL Slider are supposed to be flaps?