This is very reassuring, it's good to know that the Devs are working on 1.8, I'm glad to know that they're getting a brake from all their work on SR2 though, they probably need it.
As long as it's historically accurate, it's fine, that's why there are planes like the B-24 that have liveries like "Strawberry Bitch" or "The Dragon and his Tail" on SimplePlanes. I'm sure the moderators will be fine with it as long as it's historically accurate.
@AndrewGarrison I've heard that SR-2 will be available for iOS next year; by next year do you mean shortly after December 31st, or literally a year later, like next November? I'm really excited!
@stig27 you got 8/10 on looks because of the custom landing gear, you put more effort into making them, than if you just put on stock landing gear. Also, the canards are unique, because no one else has done that yet in the challenge. Also, what do you mean by, "I forgot the 360"?
The blast radius of a bomb cannot be changed, the explosion size can though. Heck, you could have a bomb that has an absolutely MASSIVE explosion size, but the radius of the explosion power would not change.
@stig27 I tested it out, here are the results: 8/10 on looks, it looks nice, I like the canards, and the custom landing gear are pretty cool, but it could have more detail. 6/10 on performance, it's very shakey while it's flying, and it's hard to control. 8/10 on power, I was easily able to take on the Destroyers with the absolute TRUCKLOAD of Inferno Missiles it has, and I finished off the Beast by salvo'ing the rest of the Infernos at it. 10/10 on following the rules, as there seems to be no broken rules in this creation. Total score, 32/40.
@Blue0Bull well, it does have some major differences than the MK. 1 other than being red; it looks different, I added some more details to it to make it look more "high-tech" and the launching force of the flare charges is much higher. Also for some reason, it sets things on fire, unlike the Mk. 1, idk why.
This looks pretty good! You definitely did a nice job on the cockpit, and I like how did a full cabin too, very cool! Why is everyone on the plane naked though XD
I'm surprised that the only thing that got damaged was the wing, you'd think a landing like that would just tear the nose and/or the cargo bay in half!
I tested it out, here are the results: 6/10 for looks, it looks a little weird, but it could be worse. 7/10 for performance, it pitches up and down very sharply, which can make it a little difficult to control at times, and when I fired a missile, it blew up the plane. 7/10 for power, the two missiles made short work of the destroyers, (I did find a way to fire the missiles without the plane exploding, don't worry.) and the torpedos finished off the Beast. 10/10 for following the rules, as there are no broken rules in this creation. Total score, 30/40.
Soviet Anthem quietly plays in the background
+2"T" to be tagged!
It looks pretty good, although I'd suggest a different paint job, like grey, or army-green.
@Ephwurd Here he is, the second coming of Spefyjerbf Christ!
+3This looks pretty good, thanks for participating!
@AnOlympicWalnut WHERE ARE YOUR FINGERS?
Vsauce - In my mouth
This is not yours, you should delete it, or atleast post a different version that has some changes made.
@ASDFASDF1 Yeah, it doesn't crash the game if the turret is gone. Idk why, but it works.
@ASDFASDF1 because if nobody can play it without it crashing, then what's the point of having it if you can't use it?
@stig27 oh, no problem!
Plane: flies into a wall Plane: SMOOSH
+1This is very reassuring, it's good to know that the Devs are working on 1.8, I'm glad to know that they're getting a brake from all their work on SR2 though, they probably need it.
+1As long as it's historically accurate, it's fine, that's why there are planes like the B-24 that have liveries like "Strawberry Bitch" or "The Dragon and his Tail" on SimplePlanes. I'm sure the moderators will be fine with it as long as it's historically accurate.
@Minecraftpoweer that's ok! I'm glad that you helped me though, I'll contact you in the future if you want to help me!
@Killerfrog14 lol, thanks!
@AnOlympicWalnut WHERE ARE YOUR FINGERS
YEAH I AGREE WITH RAILFANETHAN HOW WOULD A WW2 BOMBER BE CAPABLE OF CARRYING 75,000 POUNDS OF EXPLOSIVES AND WHY ARE WE TALKING IN ALL CAPS
+1@AndrewGarrison I've heard that SR-2 will be available for iOS next year; by next year do you mean shortly after December 31st, or literally a year later, like next November? I'm really excited!
Sukhoi SU-37
Hey, Vsauce, Michael here,
WHERE, ARE YOUR FINGERS?
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
THANOS PLANE
@stig27 you got 8/10 on looks because of the custom landing gear, you put more effort into making them, than if you just put on stock landing gear. Also, the canards are unique, because no one else has done that yet in the challenge. Also, what do you mean by, "I forgot the 360"?
The blast radius of a bomb cannot be changed, the explosion size can though. Heck, you could have a bomb that has an absolutely MASSIVE explosion size, but the radius of the explosion power would not change.
+1@stig27 I tested it out, here are the results: 8/10 on looks, it looks nice, I like the canards, and the custom landing gear are pretty cool, but it could have more detail. 6/10 on performance, it's very shakey while it's flying, and it's hard to control. 8/10 on power, I was easily able to take on the Destroyers with the absolute TRUCKLOAD of Inferno Missiles it has, and I finished off the Beast by salvo'ing the rest of the Infernos at it. 10/10 on following the rules, as there seems to be no broken rules in this creation. Total score, 32/40.
@stig27 sure, definitely! I'll give it a try, and give feedback as soon as I can! And it's AWESOMENESS360, not AWESOMENESS.
This looks awesome! I love how the buildings and structures look, very futuristic! For a hasty creation, this is wonderful!
+1@Blue0Bull well, it does have some major differences than the MK. 1 other than being red; it looks different, I added some more details to it to make it look more "high-tech" and the launching force of the flare charges is much higher. Also for some reason, it sets things on fire, unlike the Mk. 1, idk why.
@FuzzyAircraftProductions @CPWoody thanks!
This reminds me of my post Yeet, lmao
+1This looks pretty good! You definitely did a nice job on the cockpit, and I like how did a full cabin too, very cool! Why is everyone on the plane naked though XD
@ACEPILOT109 Yeah, hkrskshkshkrshkskhsshrkhsrkshk
@jamesPLANESii oh, good thing nobody other than the pilot was on, that would've be terrible.
+1@jamesPLANESii that 747 crash and the B-52 crash were pretty tragic though, hopefully the 747 wasn't carrying many passengers, if at all.
+1@jamesPLANESii I'm talking about what you'd think would've happened in the game, not irl.
I'm surprised that the only thing that got damaged was the wing, you'd think a landing like that would just tear the nose and/or the cargo bay in half!
+3@CPWoody
T
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️😂😂😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️😂😂️🅱️😂😂😂️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️😂😂😂🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️😂😂😂🅱️😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️😂😂😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️😂😂️🅱️😂😂😂️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️😂😂😂🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️
🅱️😂😂😂🅱️😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️🅱️😂😂😂🅱️🅱️😂😂🅱️🅱️
🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️
@DeezDucks @destroyerP @RailfanEthan SpiritusRaptor - Internal Screaming
+3Build a jet trainer
@Minecraftpoweer
Mr. Mecha would've been proud. (Anyone else remember him?)
+1Your creations never cease to amaze me...
How is the volcano erupting!? Is that a Mod or something?
I tested it out, here are the results: 6/10 for looks, it looks a little weird, but it could be worse. 7/10 for performance, it pitches up and down very sharply, which can make it a little difficult to control at times, and when I fired a missile, it blew up the plane. 7/10 for power, the two missiles made short work of the destroyers, (I did find a way to fire the missiles without the plane exploding, don't worry.) and the torpedos finished off the Beast. 10/10 for following the rules, as there are no broken rules in this creation. Total score, 30/40.
@kerbober thanks, all I did was look off of the Grass Block texture file, and paint it onto the SimplePlanes version.
Sounds interesting, imma join.
These look nice, especially the HAVCAR1, the turret looks pretty good!
"Thanks to all that participated" Me in my head:
+2