Profile image

stridsvagn 103's hydropneumatic tracks

41.4k sakkijarven  4.4 years ago

Generally speaking, this is really a CRAZY PROJECT ! I can feel my CPU is burning ! And on the other hand i wanna explain is that i have no true blueprint for strv's hydropenumatic track, so there is a big gap between this work's principle and reality's. Cause my impression of this track only stays at the game of WOT...

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 16.3ft (5.0m)
  • Length 28.7ft (8.8m)
  • Height 9.6ft (2.9m)
  • Empty Weight 30,332lbs (13,758kg)
  • Loaded Weight 32,105lbs (14,562kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.399
  • Wing Loading N/A
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 9812

Parts

  • Number of Parts 1102
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 10,441
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    WoT do you mean???

    6 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,165 Formula350

    ahahah Here I am, thinking "Hey! I can reduce the parts on this thing by like 200 or more!!"
    .
    So I replace those ~25 parts-per-hub wheel outer-rings, with a single Hollow Fuselage of the correct size. Did just the back idler wheels first (whatever they're called, opposite of the sprocketed drive wheel). Get those two done (4 rings total), part count is down to 1026, nnnoice!
    "I'll go test it now, see how it goes..."
    ..... -_-
    Thanks, Jundroo, for making the defaults-to-curved-shape Fuselage have a -SQUARE- hitbox/collision box!!! *sigh*
    I mean, it works fine, doesn't technically impede anything mechanically that I can tell, but VISUALLY... That's another story. Visually it is such a facepalm moment, as the tracks pass over those in a derpy square pattern overtop the round ("circular") fuselage part.... T_T


    Teh Moar U Kno! _,-`*
    At least I only burned 30mins on it :P

    +1 2.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    But this object is so crazy.It may has used more than 1000 components.Although my computer is good.

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    This liquid-pneumatic suspension is what I want. I have made a liquid-pneumatic suspension before and it failed

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,545 IGNikolaev

    Very cool!

    +1 4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mrrobothaha Your PC "I CAN FELLA THE WARP OVER TAKING MEEE, IT IS A GOOD PANE! IT IS A GOOD PANE!" X'D

    +2 4.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,361 Zanedavid

    Lol...Now listen here buster, you think we can use a thousand part sub assembly like this, are you trying to flex on all of us or something? I’m kidding I really love the detail in this it looks amazing!

    +1 4.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.3k NFIGMT

    nice

    +1 4.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.7k Stormfur

    Can you disable drag?

    +1 4.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    Holy cow that’s amazing. Is there a way to make it turn?

    +2 4.4 years ago