Introduction
Some silliness really, i have introduced a disposable top wing to my "not a GeeBee" in a similar manner as was trialed with the Hawker Hurricane and then added 2 modest jet engines similar to what was trialed with the I-153 Chaika DM. Then i removed the piston engine and replaced it with a D.A.V.E MKII bomb which is ejected by a pneumatic reservoir (charged on the ground before takeoff)
Controls
AG1 releases bomb
AG2 releases the top wing
VTOL down for flaps
TRIM for elevator trimming
Pictures
Bomb release
Wing release
What happens if you are too close to the bomb when it goes bang
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 27.1ft (8.2m)
- Length 19.3ft (5.9m)
- Height 10.6ft (3.2m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 3,621lbs (1,642kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 18.614
- Wing Loading 18.5lbs/ft2 (90.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 195.4ft2 (18.2m2)
- Drag Points 407
Parts
- Number of Parts 538
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 1,844
Interesting@RamboJutter
@SussyBreadBoi really? so you understand that the extra wing would double the lift of the plane but it also increases the amount of force required to carry out manoevers as its wider and an extra surface to move against the flow of air. The wing off bit was to counter the loss of mass forward when the bomb is dropped to keep CofG and CofL in balance. They tried this wing style with the Hawker Hurricane, maybe have a read up on that.
Makes no sense, why does wing off make it more agile..
@AWESOMENESS360 same as in real life, more wing area equals more lift to assist with flying with the heavy bomb
@SussyBreadBoi if you loose the bomb and the top wing it's really manoeuvreable... its intentionally more sluggish when the massive bomb is fitted for obvious reasons.
What’s the point of the detachable top-wing?
So sick but why fly like a bus
Your name reminds me of Rambo last blood tbh