Auto Credit Based on RamboJutter's Short Hartlepool MkI 5.9
An evolution of the Short Sunderland, similar flying characteristics but longer range and larger load capacity, it was designed as a half-way house between the Sunderland and the Hartlepool to fill a gap in requirements prior to the jet age. The fuselage was used extensively in the Hartlepool jet successor which can be seen here.
IMPORTANT: USE AG3 TO OPEN BOMB BAYS AND THEN AG4-6 TO DROP BOMBS, dont manually drop bombs otherwise big-bad-a-BOOM!
AG1 for flaps
AG7 for turrets which have their own cameras.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Short Hartlepool MkI 5.9
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 153.9ft (46.9m)
- Length 120.5ft (36.7m)
- Height 45.5ft (13.9m)
- Empty Weight 69,082lbs (31,335kg)
- Loaded Weight 91,118lbs (41,330kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.098
- Wing Loading 7.8lbs/ft2 (38.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 11,672.1ft2 (1,084.4m2)
- Drag Points 35099
Parts
- Number of Parts 1252
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 5,059
@DestinyAviation yeah it ended up thinner than I would have liked but it's so long that a matching width would have lead to a very strange cockpit etc. Thanks for the comment and upvote.
Looks great! The fuselage is pretty skinny, but I love the other design elements!
Doesn’t look short to me (joke)
@RamboJutter sorry Bro
@Tang0five bv238 was bigger (intentionally) Vickers type c was also bigger (by accident....) Oh and my flying battleship was also huge but barring them ;) it's a shame your device won't run it as it's nice to fly, does about 250mph like the Sunderland but tootles around v nicely.
@Tang0five thanks man, but now I have to go check all my builds... I think the b229 was bigger (or my take on the concept anyway), I did build a Valkerie but didn't post it.
@LOWEWAYY have you tried camo? Or building a 120ft flying boat? The wing tips alone are 32 parts, the gun turrets on the side are 35ish parts, it all adds up.
This is a rather large beautiful bird! Incidentally is this your biggest build in terms of dimensions?
@RamboJutter 800? How it have 800?
@LOWEWAYY no idea, the bomb bays are 440 parts, so remove them and you still have 800 parts.
@RamboJutter mobile friendly posible?
@CRJ900Pilot @ChiChiWerx thanks =) I did miss a bit of camo on the fuselage but baring that I was happy, thanks again for your comments and support.
Nice, nailed the camo and the bomb system!
Woah cool!
@LOWEWAYY bomb bay / release mechanism
How it have hight part?