Tasty, as always @SledDriver

@ChickenMcNuggets007 Yes, of course. How's them nuggets?

@Diloph OK, well, maybe I was wrong about you.

@SledDriver yooooo remember me? I'm alive

Err I thought I did upvote, and I’m just saying ur an amazing builder, not my buddy but I will give it an upvote, I tried spotlighting but literally when I got to ur name it had more points and like yeaa@SledDriver

@Diloph Oh look, another person who refuses to upvote my builds, but acts like he's my buddy.

@SledDriver whats this supposed to tell me? MeNoGodOfMajicLykeU

@SnoWFLakE0s Well, I'm simply not interested in people who don't appreciate my builds, mate. There's nothing ambivalent about seeing something good and refusing to so much as acknowledge it. It's a choice, and you've made that choice consistently for a very long time.

Intriguing. Personally, ambivalence != hostility, but sure.

If tagging is a problem for you I can gladly avoid that.

why now?

I've attempted to start up a constructive discussion solely because the build is of interest, not the user necessarily. Probably why I don't have a track record of upvoting your creations, 'cause flying things don't really fit my bill. It's just another opinion on a common field of creation, mate.

Well, cool with the upvotes, though. I just sometimes neglect to do so.

@SnoWFLakE0s

.
My iteration of such systems- I daresay somewhat simpler in terms of actual part count, and especially if you use a script to build things this type of XML is far easier to implement. Beacon lights are the sole thing required.

Wrong on all counts.

• The part count of my timer is higher only because I'm using 44 beaconLights for the backlight. Each digit itself uses 7 parts, regardless of whether beacons or airbrakes are used.
• I used airbrakes not because I'm unaware of beaconLights, but because they have several advantages over beaconLights: they look better; the thickness of the font stroke can be adjusted without losing the straight lines of the segments; and they can be backlit.
• Your XML isn't "far easier to implement" -- compare the inputs on my digital gauge to yours, and see which ones are (far) more complex.

Lastly and most importantly, why are you tagging me? You've never shown any goodwill towards me -- never upvoted my posts, never commented -- so why now? Just so we're clear, if someone has refused to upvote my builds for a long time, to me that means that our values are so different and irreconciliable that I have zero interest in that person.

@klm747klm747 The follower of the Beast?

@ThomasRoderick Lateral thinking :)

@Diloph Seven-segment display

this man uses airbreaks for every weird build

How do you code this to do the numbers!?!??!!?!

Holy f*, just... how...

@SledDriver I'm your 666th follower! Congrats!
-KLM

@SledDriver that we sure can do

@Mustang51 Well, we can hope.

That would be perfect. I don’t know if you’ve used infinite flight but there you have a bunch of information which you can choose to display (engine rpm, AGL, verticale speed, G forces, etc). I would love to see this in the game but I doubt it will ever be there

@Mustang51 Maybe there should be a 'text readout' part that could be configured to display anything we chose.

@SledDriver yeah that would be even better but this is good enough. I’ll just wait until a round number to start turning. It’s much better than what I’ve been doing at the moment. It would be cool if there was just a clock or timer in the upper corner of the screen actually like in some other aircraft games

Long time no see, @Z3RO

@Mustang51 Hmm... If the game allowed measuring the time starting from an AG turning on it would be possible to make an actual stopwatch.

if knowledge isnt a tool to bring attention, i dont know what you've been displaying. but shit, those builds you are releasing are intriguing.