Profile image

GBU-15

11.5k shipster  3.7 years ago
178 downloads

My favorite weapon yet. I have taken a quite different approach to this weapon as opposed to my others. That said, it also works the best. To save, drag from either the black fuselage part, or the detacher, though I’d recommend taking it by the black fuselage.

She’s quite hefty, but I’ve managed to 100% eliminate the wobble (on high physics).

I made it not require a lock for a reason; it can target and hit the bridges on the “Bridge Demolition” mission

Have fun!

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 3.2ft (1.0m)
  • Length 13.2ft (4.0m)
  • Height 6.2ft (1.9m)
  • Empty Weight 4,395lbs (1,993kg)
  • Loaded Weight 4,395lbs (1,993kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading 102.1lbs/ft2 (498.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 43.1ft2 (4.0m2)
  • Drag Points 612

Parts

  • Number of Parts 27
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 89
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    xD thank you @Windworn

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,080 Windworn

    @shipster wow the auto lock on is really good, glad i stole this thing Xd

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    Sure thing @LucasNicky

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.8k SyntheticL

    It fits so nice on the fantom boi. May I request using this on my remake of the F-4C?

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    Thank you @BodganX , I’m genuinely sorry about what I said. After I wrote it, I read it from a receivers point-of-view, and realized it was a bit harsh, but I am a believer in second chances, and hopefully you are too. If I was in your position, I would probably be frustrated at the community as well, but as a mid-field player, I didn’t realize it. After you left, I realized how much I liked your builds, and that they go hand-in-hand with the eye watering full-interior replicas, and like a fish and a tail, they can’t go without one another. I truly hope that you can accept this apology, and maybe we can even do a collaboration in the future? Thank you for your time and efforts.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.8k SyntheticL

    @shipster Maybe the su-24 thing....

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    That’s probably a good idea 🤣 or something like a large bomber would work @LucasNicky

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.8k SyntheticL

    lol this thing is too big it even moves the aircraft's core of mass to a very danger level
    maybe i should let the F-4 carry this not the smol EF-30

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    😂😂 @LucasNicky the plane I tested it on was smaller 🤣

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.8k SyntheticL
    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    That’s a good plan because if it’s any lighter it’ll slow down in midair too quickly @LucasNicky

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    Ok hahaha @LucasNicky

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.8k SyntheticL

    @shipster Hmm, it seems like too big to let an EF30 to carry 2 of these... lol
    im gonna equip this on the EF-30's centerline pylon

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    So how would you rate my GBU-15, 1 being absolute garbage and 10 being perfect @WarHawk95
    @Windworn

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k WarHawk95

    @shipster thx

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    xD do you like it? @Windworn

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    I don’t mind @WarHawk95

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k shipster

    Sure xD if you do, I’d suggest either renaming them “GBU-15L” and “GBU-15R” to avoid launching them at the same time due to the fact that they don’t actually ‘lock on’ @LucasNicky

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.8k SyntheticL

    Nice, could I add 2 of it on my EF30?
    p.s. RAF livery

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,080 Windworn

    STEAL first, test later

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.5k rexzion

    @WarHawk95 k

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k WarHawk95

    @rexzion also did you see that the control surfaces actually move with the relative wind ?

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k WarHawk95

    @rexzion yeah, me. high part count is the price to pay for realism. I can make a really low part count version but it will be far less detailed.
    Also half the parts are for the launcher itself, not the missile. If you only keep the AIM-9 and not the AERO-3 rail the part count is divided by 2.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.5k rexzion

    @WarHawk95 it's like 60 parts, you really think anyone is gonna actually put that on a plane

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k WarHawk95

    @rexzion ?

    3.7 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments