Profile image

[FSF] Tracer Mk.IIa

108k TheUltimatePlaneLover  1.1 years ago
Auto Credit Based on TheUltimatePlaneLover's Tracer

Tracer

Gloster Meteor ahh looking fighter

Perhaps a peculiar design,

but it works fairly well. It's not the fastest, nor it the most agile, but it still finds itself a formidable foe for a few reasons. The first of these is armor, as the Tracer has quite favorable protection when compared with other aircraft in FSF like the MV-1 or F9R. The second reason is its armament, as the Tracer, like the Archer Mk.VI, is armed with six 20mm cannons that can absolutely pummel an opponent. The Tracer may not be the best of the best, but it's definitely worthy!

Trivia

-Idk lol

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Tracer
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 28.2ft (8.6m)
  • Length 31.6ft (9.6m)
  • Height 9.8ft (3.0m)
  • Empty Weight 5,295lbs (2,402kg)
  • Loaded Weight 11,546lbs (5,237kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.226
  • Wing Loading 56.3lbs/ft2 (274.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 205.2ft2 (19.1m2)
  • Drag Points 1338

Parts

  • Number of Parts 59
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 350
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    13.6k SPsidearm

    upon Futher inspection it is indeed a Gloster meteor.

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.6k SPsidearm

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Looks like the 262 to me

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Not exacly, just smol inlets lol

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SPsidearm Ok I'm sure you're just trolling me at this point
    I tried to make it somewhat original but hail nah that wing does not look like the Messerschmitt 262

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    ITS A FRICKIN METEORRRRRRRRRRr

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Erm... Rocket powered gloster meteor????

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.6k SPsidearm

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    Wing Looks like the the 262's
    While the elevators are the 104's

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KPLBall @SPsidearm
    Guys look at the main wing and elevator placement

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.6k SPsidearm

    @CrestelAeronautics
    Is u stupib? I evaluated it and they DON'T. HAVE. A. RESEMBLANCE.

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KPLBall

    Facepalm

    Look!
    Tracer
    Meteor
    both (tracer is more noticeable)

    How do you not see it!

    Dont you see? One milli- oh wait, wrong script

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    63.4k KPLBall

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover It looks so different
    Only Murdoch could find the difference

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.6k SPsidearm

    Hmmmm

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KPLBall How??????

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @CrestelAeronautics Yeah, plus the Tracer is less maneuverable. There's a reason it only saw 3 years in service lol

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    It is literally, a worse meteor
    Ok, ok, here is my verdict:
    - Smaller intakes
    • that means less air
    - copies the (early) meteor’s armament
    • 6x 20mm Cannons
    •I will give you half a point on firepower, because later meteors had only 4x 20mm Cannons


    Other than that, great plane!

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    63.4k KPLBall

    I don't see the resemblance

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,555 M109simp

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Bruv second by like a minute 😭 nice Meteor tho

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Requested Tags:
    @Boeing727200F
    @SPSidearm
    @RestlessGalaxies

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Tag List 4:
    @Karroc9522
    @SuperSuperTheSylph
    @KPLBall

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Tag List 3:
    @GuardianAerospace
    @IDK0
    @LoganAviation

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Tag List 2:
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    @126
    @TTL

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Tag List 1:
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @PrussianAirlines

    1.1 years ago