@BaconAircraft, sorry, but what I actually meant was if the product LOOKS more utilitarian than others, not it being more utilitarian than others. I have edited my previous comment to clarify such.
@BaconAircraft, the military contractors now design vehicles and equipment that pretty much look cliche sci-if cool instead of utilitarian, especially for the headlights and turret designs. You can see the difference between old models like the HMMWV and the M1 Abrams tank, and newer military vehicles like the OshKosh L-ATV and the NextGen Abrams, with the more egregious example, being the recent KFf51 Panther. I can see that the “bacon” logo, it looks militarily modern, in a sci-if sense, but I see this military product looks more utilitarian than others.
@BaconAircraft, sorry, but what I actually meant was if the product LOOKS more utilitarian than others, not it being more utilitarian than others. I have edited my previous comment to clarify such.
Yeah that is true.
About it being utilitarian tho… I can neither confirm nor deny.
@Bellcat
@BaconAircraft, the military contractors now design vehicles and equipment that pretty much look cliche sci-if cool instead of utilitarian, especially for the headlights and turret designs. You can see the difference between old models like the HMMWV and the M1 Abrams tank, and newer military vehicles like the OshKosh L-ATV and the NextGen Abrams, with the more egregious example, being the recent KFf51 Panther. I can see that the “bacon” logo, it looks militarily modern, in a sci-if sense, but I see this military product looks more utilitarian than others.
Uh, no, what makes you think that? @Bellcat
This looks like what a military contractor would design in the 21st century.
Raytheon more like Bayceon
thoop
T
ban hammer 😳😳😳😳😳
T
Yugoslavian war crime machinery.
bacon slapper
T
Bacon launcher
spa
Cool