If you dont know, which is unlikely, the concept reveal of the su 75 "Checkmate" was revealed last week. It looks very interesting and seems like an opposition to the US's F-35's and F-15's along with China's new J-35 aircraft. There will be no real functioning prototype until 2023 so its hard to say how this aircraft will perform. Those are my thoughts what are yours?
@tucan it seems to complicated.Like the F-35's cockpit is like a tesla.Its pretty simple and of course i dont know half of the words on the screen but its an intersting plane.But with this one it looks like it would be complicated and id eject when i hear one beep but the beep will be an altitude warning :/
Just like many of today's fighter projects, the policy works mostly as follows:
1 - Data Platform - The plane needs to be able to be the forward eyes as well as able providing targeting data to its allies. Computation power and information are key to a successful aircraft.
2 - CHEAP - If a plane is ludicrously expensive, your only client is gonna be your country (ex. F-22). If you can sell it to your allies, you're guaranteed that many countries will take the plane for a bargain, and try their best to remain your allies through support.
3 - "Stealth" - This has taken a backseat in reality. These planes might have a smaller radar cross-section than previous generation fighters, but by no means are they F-117 stealthy. Because of improved radar technology and identification techniques have improved, it would COST MUCH MORE to develop a technology to counter the new radar (hence pointer 2)
4 - Manoeuvrability. Most of these planes have reached the apex of human limits when it comes to manoeuvrability. It makes no sense to make a plane so manoeuvrable that would kill its pilot with insane over-the-top G-limit rolls. Fly-by-wire can calculate the best limits in order to keep the pilot safe, but in which case, if you intend the make a flying-gymnastic machine, you would need to resort to UAVs instead.
These 4 pointers are the cornerstone to today's planes and dictate what kind of planes are considered "top-of-the-range". Be it the F-35, JF-17, SU-75, FC-31, Tejas, X-2, etc...
It’s actually the SU-75, SU-57 already exists as the “Felon”. Honestly though, the aircraft looks pretty damn cool, hard to say how it’ll perform though, as it’s only a prototype thus far. If it can outmaneuver and outrun the F-35, along with being capable of the same tasks, then I’d say it can certainly outperform the F-35. As for the F-22, I imagine it’d stand not much of a chance against it. However, the SU-57 definitely seems like a promising match against the F-22, but of course, the only true way to be sure of which one is more powerful would be to pit them against each other. As probably insane/entertaining as that would be, it’s likely something that neither the US nor Russia want to happen.
@Keplerrr I dont think its that simple, but okay.
@tucan it seems to complicated.Like the F-35's cockpit is like a tesla.Its pretty simple and of course i dont know half of the words on the screen but its an intersting plane.But with this one it looks like it would be complicated and id eject when i hear one beep but the beep will be an altitude warning :/
@Keplerrr why not?
It Looks Nice in my opinion but i dont think i would fly it if i could :/
its pog
all i have to say
@BogdanX I didnt even realize i put su 57 instead of 75
but yes very true.
It looks like when sci-fi films try to make tye F-35 more futuristic
Just like many of today's fighter projects, the policy works mostly as follows:
1 - Data Platform - The plane needs to be able to be the forward eyes as well as able providing targeting data to its allies. Computation power and information are key to a successful aircraft.
2 - CHEAP - If a plane is ludicrously expensive, your only client is gonna be your country (ex. F-22). If you can sell it to your allies, you're guaranteed that many countries will take the plane for a bargain, and try their best to remain your allies through support.
3 - "Stealth" - This has taken a backseat in reality. These planes might have a smaller radar cross-section than previous generation fighters, but by no means are they F-117 stealthy. Because of improved radar technology and identification techniques have improved, it would COST MUCH MORE to develop a technology to counter the new radar (hence pointer 2)
4 - Manoeuvrability. Most of these planes have reached the apex of human limits when it comes to manoeuvrability. It makes no sense to make a plane so manoeuvrable that would kill its pilot with insane over-the-top G-limit rolls. Fly-by-wire can calculate the best limits in order to keep the pilot safe, but in which case, if you intend the make a flying-gymnastic machine, you would need to resort to UAVs instead.
These 4 pointers are the cornerstone to today's planes and dictate what kind of planes are considered "top-of-the-range". Be it the F-35, JF-17, SU-75, FC-31, Tejas, X-2, etc...
My thoughts?
THE FUTURE IS NOW OLD MAN
@Dathcha an American superweapon
It’s actually the SU-75, SU-57 already exists as the “Felon”. Honestly though, the aircraft looks pretty damn cool, hard to say how it’ll perform though, as it’s only a prototype thus far. If it can outmaneuver and outrun the F-35, along with being capable of the same tasks, then I’d say it can certainly outperform the F-35. As for the F-22, I imagine it’d stand not much of a chance against it. However, the SU-57 definitely seems like a promising match against the F-22, but of course, the only true way to be sure of which one is more powerful would be to pit them against each other. As probably insane/entertaining as that would be, it’s likely something that neither the US nor Russia want to happen.
I think a Florida man with lawn chair could take it down
I think the .30 cal tri pacer will hand them their butts on a silver platter
@ALTMTR same here
The Rafale Killer as it was dubbed. Not too hyped about nor am I too worried.