Profile image

Looking for Peer Reviewers - Kinematics & Trigonometry Competence Required

66.6k SnoWFLakE0s  4.3 years ago

Hey folks! I've been working on developing an FCS for torpedoes the past few weeks, and my theory is all there- just awaiting actual building in SP. Before I do that though, I want to make sure that my theory behind it makes good sense.

So, to any of you out there in the community with the time and knowledge to solve a moderately complicated kinematics problem, please leave a comment below! I'd greatly appreciate your help.

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    161k spefyjerbf

    I'm a little late, but yeah, it should work.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.9k ChrisPy

    hello its me again I figured out the stuff for the f-16 BTW was able to make different flap stages with activation groups with clamp!

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.6k SnoWFLakE0s

    @WarHawk95
    .
    MCP asked for it- read the thread and the code here.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.6k SnoWFLakE0s

    @Avro683Lancaster @asteroidbook345
    .
    Thanks for the help. I'll begin testing and troubleshooting soon!

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k WarHawk95

    Dude... I can barely understand 1% of what this document says. But that thing looks awesome !
    And about your procedural crane, how did you make these pistons work one after each other ?

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SnoWFLakE0s The Lead Angle calculation method is correct, as i have done almost exactly the same thing, although in the context of intercepting a ship with another ship. The Target Velocity calculation looks like it works, although only if the ship is travelling parallel to the target. It may be possible to add a "Delta-Range" function to determine the perpendicular factor as well, although i understand that it may complicate input, operation and programming.
    Apart from that, however, the system looks as though it will work effectively as it stands currently.

    +1 4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    66.6k SnoWFLakE0s

    @spefyjerbf @asteroidbook345 @Avro683Lancaster
    .
    Thanks for the reply! I just need you to review my work for the purely physics-based section, the conversion of physics into funky trees hasn't been done completely yet. That's for me to work on and fix! Anyhow, here's the documentation of my process.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    161k spefyjerbf

    I can definitely give it a shot. Is this projectile or reference frame kinematics?
    Edit: ignore the question. I read the forum and this is probably a projectile motion problem.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    i could give it a try

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Someone help this man like how he helps everyone

    +8 4.3 years ago