Just read the description how to fly it) most fun is in flaps, landing gear and making a trully flexible wing with tamed aileron reversal problem. And 1:1 scale
works amasing! Looks Amasing! I ve tried to make it exactly the same way, and failed totally (looked like shit, didnt move at all), and you did it. congrats!
Alejandro, is that you again? I recomend you stop just repainting other's creations (especially in such crazy colors))) the moderators will probably just ban you again after doing this. Build this stuff on your own, stop being some jelly fan-esc person, and do it yourself.
@BaconEggs Sure) I've seen him upload hyperloops plane with only another paint scheme just an hour after the discussion about your 737)) I suggest your delete your comment here later so he doesnt know) otherwise such a person would just think its a conspiracy and wont learn anything)
Just noticed the way you ve made the engine fans! You're one bloody genius ! wish somebody made this small adjustable prop engine with turboprop sound...
well, may be its not that much of a misdemeanor given hes a newbie? He has left a clear link to a BaconEggs predecessor now and just added a livery. He didnt make it a successor the last time?
its from an unfinished cartoon) btw, take a look on the teaser, its very promising https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UZcispcGBs
and the build itself is cool!
Looks very promising. Its probably less reactive just due to additional weight. You can reduce weight of those wing bodies in xml. Btw, can make you better wings if you want) kind of tired of my overengineered planes and would be glad to make something smaller)
Didnt yet had time to fly it, but man, the way it looks! Sexy) and i dont generally like futuristic stealth planes, but this one is amasing piece of design)
@JayJoeCc i've just made a tu-104, basically the same plane with wider passenger fuselage. Had to read about it a lot, it has the worst safety record in russia, not because equipment or structural failures, but because it was very difficult to fly) and all this includes its bomber prototype.
Btw, you can use wings, engines, empennage and landing gear straight from my tu-104, they are almost identical. You just need to shorten front gear a bit, make a fuselage narrower and move the horisontal stabiliser higher. I can help if you try such a project. Would be interesting to see the results
@EternalDarkness well, no offence to them, but i conscider your ships being a whole level higher, the are more realistic, detailed and do not have this "toy" look)
@ChiChiWerx Yes, there is lots of examples, but there was only one Spitfire with german engine)). Funny thing that after the war, Spain, who got the licence to produce He-111 and Bf-109, but obviousle was unable to buy german engines anumore, produced both with Spitfire's RR Merlin engines instead)))
@ChiChiWerx Luftwaffe actually had one captured, they used it for different tests, and futhermore, when the engine wore off, they've fitted it with german inverted-V Daimler Benz engines, they used it for testing various engines of this type) For example BF-109 G-6, G-16 and K-4 higher powered DB 603-605 engines (both are based on original BF-109E DB 601, but almost twise as powerful due to superchargers and nitrox and wather-methanol ingection))) first saw air in a spitfire)))
@GhostHTX Yeah, sorry. Most of my planes are at best slideshow on mobile devices, one a lot smaller and older one worked on samsung tab a bit, but thats it. This one is heavy even for some PCs, probably due to huge flexible wings physics (my office laptop lags exactly when wing flexes most)
Sorry, i really like making those complex flaps, wings and landing gear, that's basically impossible for mobile. I'm slowly working on a very unusual small south american jet airliner project (designed by famous Fokke-Wulf chief designer Kurt Tank), may be it will. But not sure)
@GhostHTX well, it was not so difficult, all my models have such. what was difficult - to stop them shaking and glitching due to plane weight. Unfortunately that still happens on not so powerful PCs, like my office laptop, though not so often.
@PINK im lazy) these complex flaps and wing shape are pain in the ass to make and tune, and all my tupolev planes were designed on same base, this allows me to use same assemblies for landing gear, wing parts, flaps, ailerons and so on, just rescaling them and modifying)) but im working on a Convair CV880 now, again because it has a wing and fuselage similliar to Tu-104))) but i'm remaking flaps, spoilers and landing gear from scratch, so it is slow). And also i just make planes that i like visually.
it looks more like AA-Cruiser to me)
@BogdanX i actually like the way it flies. Me-262 was succeptible to stall and difficult to control, and this one feels just like this.
Amaising!
Cool! So much nostalgia)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/7mJ33p/Myasischev-3M-Bison-1956-strategic-bomber-WIP-0-8
Just read the description how to fly it) most fun is in flaps, landing gear and making a trully flexible wing with tamed aileron reversal problem. And 1:1 scale
@Jackhammer312 try if you lack size:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/7mJ33p/Myasischev-3M-Bison-1956-strategic-bomber-WIP-0-8
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/75Lsov/Boeing747-8F
=)
@Delphinus https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/483588/Fine-Tuner + https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/524146/Overload + disableAircraftCollisions="true"
or XML modding for thise who lack hardcore sex)
@airsoft i'm afraid toi know how much time did it take) its like goldsmithing)
Nice! It reminds me about "Elite" )
works amasing! Looks Amasing! I ve tried to make it exactly the same way, and failed totally (looked like shit, didnt move at all), and you did it. congrats!
WOW! So nice looking!
Interesting! Gonna test)
@BaconEggs btw, i wrote him a message, no responce) but may be he cant, looks like hes been deleted again ))))))
really really nice, especially the fuselage!
@BaconEggs thats definitely him) this one speaks spanish too)
Alejandro, is that you again? I recomend you stop just repainting other's creations (especially in such crazy colors))) the moderators will probably just ban you again after doing this. Build this stuff on your own, stop being some jelly fan-esc person, and do it yourself.
@BaconEggs i suppose hes back )))
https://www.simpleplanes.com/u/Lucastricolorfactory
@BaconEggs exactly) its difficult to live if you learn nothing and have so much ego)
I preliminary like it))) gonna take a closer look, and sure, i wont be disappointed)
Oh) such a nostalgic vannilla plane)
@BaconEggs Oups)) Seems like he's off this site for good already) his account must have been deleted)))
@BaconEggs Sure) I've seen him upload hyperloops plane with only another paint scheme just an hour after the discussion about your 737)) I suggest your delete your comment here later so he doesnt know) otherwise such a person would just think its a conspiracy and wont learn anything)
Just noticed the way you ve made the engine fans! You're one bloody genius ! wish somebody made this small adjustable prop engine with turboprop sound...
Hm? You just repainted HyperLoops flying wing? Now i understand why Bacon got mad)
well, may be its not that much of a misdemeanor given hes a newbie? He has left a clear link to a BaconEggs predecessor now and just added a livery. He didnt make it a successor the last time?
its from an unfinished cartoon) btw, take a look on the teaser, its very promising https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UZcispcGBs
and the build itself is cool!
Ha ha))) I've read about this project) Its a pity they never even tried to build it))
Looks very promising. Its probably less reactive just due to additional weight. You can reduce weight of those wing bodies in xml. Btw, can make you better wings if you want) kind of tired of my overengineered planes and would be glad to make something smaller)
Didnt yet had time to fly it, but man, the way it looks! Sexy) and i dont generally like futuristic stealth planes, but this one is amasing piece of design)
@JayJoeCc thanks a lot!
@JayJoeCc i've just made a tu-104, basically the same plane with wider passenger fuselage. Had to read about it a lot, it has the worst safety record in russia, not because equipment or structural failures, but because it was very difficult to fly) and all this includes its bomber prototype.
Btw, you can use wings, engines, empennage and landing gear straight from my tu-104, they are almost identical. You just need to shorten front gear a bit, make a fuselage narrower and move the horisontal stabiliser higher. I can help if you try such a project. Would be interesting to see the results
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1R09Kg/Tupolev-Tu-104A-1956-Update-2
@EternalDarkness well, no offence to them, but i conscider your ships being a whole level higher, the are more realistic, detailed and do not have this "toy" look)
I have no words to describe how amasing this one and your other ships are!
May i ask you to make something WW1 themed? For example german B-97 series or russian Novik class detroyers?
@JayJoeCc May be you should not fix it?)) these planes were indeed infamous for their tendency to stall)
Very very nice)
@Franticmatty Here ya go))
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/BbVw3l/Pod-Racer-normal
difficult to control though)
@mikoyanster fuselage is 1,5 scale lots of other things are randomly scaled)
@ChiChiWerx Yes, there is lots of examples, but there was only one Spitfire with german engine)). Funny thing that after the war, Spain, who got the licence to produce He-111 and Bf-109, but obviousle was unable to buy german engines anumore, produced both with Spitfire's RR Merlin engines instead)))
@ChiChiWerx Luftwaffe actually had one captured, they used it for different tests, and futhermore, when the engine wore off, they've fitted it with german inverted-V Daimler Benz engines, they used it for testing various engines of this type) For example BF-109 G-6, G-16 and K-4 higher powered DB 603-605 engines (both are based on original BF-109E DB 601, but almost twise as powerful due to superchargers and nitrox and wather-methanol ingection))) first saw air in a spitfire)))
@redbear89 @ChiChiWerx Thank you, guys! Nice to hear)
@Franticmatty i can try in the evening)
Very fun! Maybe add some joints on the ropes to make them completely flexible? Would be fun to see how it flies than)
@BaconAircraft Thanks a lot, lord Bacon) Given the fact how complex your average planes are, thats the best to hear)
@GhostHTX Yeah, sorry. Most of my planes are at best slideshow on mobile devices, one a lot smaller and older one worked on samsung tab a bit, but thats it. This one is heavy even for some PCs, probably due to huge flexible wings physics (my office laptop lags exactly when wing flexes most)
Sorry, i really like making those complex flaps, wings and landing gear, that's basically impossible for mobile. I'm slowly working on a very unusual small south american jet airliner project (designed by famous Fokke-Wulf chief designer Kurt Tank), may be it will. But not sure)
@GhostHTX well, it was not so difficult, all my models have such. what was difficult - to stop them shaking and glitching due to plane weight. Unfortunately that still happens on not so powerful PCs, like my office laptop, though not so often.
@PINK im lazy) these complex flaps and wing shape are pain in the ass to make and tune, and all my tupolev planes were designed on same base, this allows me to use same assemblies for landing gear, wing parts, flaps, ailerons and so on, just rescaling them and modifying)) but im working on a Convair CV880 now, again because it has a wing and fuselage similliar to Tu-104))) but i'm remaking flaps, spoilers and landing gear from scratch, so it is slow). And also i just make planes that i like visually.
@vonhubert thanks! That was a goal, to make it feel mighty))
@Franticmatty sure, would be really interesting to see)
@Athaya was just working on it) its not convenient to do ingame)
@BaconEggs Оops, sorry) Learning german now, it affects my spelling, Not the first time i use K in place of C )