just being stupidly curious, di you use parts from my Mirage III C ? If not well it's a pretty great build in appearance, it as some flaws but this plane really isn't easy to make so good job mate :)
@FarrowTECH I work too, and I'm working on my final exams, but I still find some time, for me having fun on this game is learning how to get better and do new things, but do as you want, I'll be happy to see a new plane in this tournament.
@Turkish001YT you can take a look at my last builds if you want, take the glass parts off and you'll see that every instruments, jauges and buttons are made of fuselage parts
@Turkish001YT first please don't use uppercase letters. And I don't know what you're talking about, there isn't any buttons in SP, we all make them by ourself.
@WarHawk95 bah écoute il a l'air bien mais pas non plus incroyable. Bon le modèle de vole ne pourra être que meilleur que le miens mais la shape me dérange déjà, et j'ai peur pour le part count.
@RandomUser09 hmmm impression, so you can like him for his screenshots because it gives you a good impression of him...ok I won't try to understand, just a little remember that you're on internet and that you can't use impression here ;)
@SimplyPlain I don't need a low part build, I have a pretty good pc too, just saying that you build planes with 1300 parts, without cockpit interiors or even the look of a build with so many parts. By "part efficiency" I don't mean low part builds, but builds where the guy who made them really know how to use parts and reduce the part count :)) your builds aren't ugly tho, and I understand that you do not mind because you have a good pc, but if you post something, it's also for people to enjoy it, at least be able to play with it or you know use it against other builds since it's a war plane. People who know how to do part efficiency are the ones who make good builds, because that's why more impressive than a 1300 parts build without a cockpit. goodnight :)
@Fox00One that's not a touch and go. but meh I feel like you don't really want to understand right ? Just keep in mind that this isn't a good landing and you'll be fine :))
just being stupidly curious, di you use parts from my Mirage III C ? If not well it's a pretty great build in appearance, it as some flaws but this plane really isn't easy to make so good job mate :)
@asteroidbook345 me sad, my mirage too
@FarrowTECH I work too, and I'm working on my final exams, but I still find some time, for me having fun on this game is learning how to get better and do new things, but do as you want, I'll be happy to see a new plane in this tournament.
@FarrowTECH well check other builds intruments and their inputs, you can look at my last one if you want
@aTerra try to do max pitch too then, also put your physics at high
@aTerra so, explain me how EVERYBODY can take off, but not you
@aTerra read the freacking description, why are people here so lazy
the mirage is beautiful, as a french guy I was obligated to make one myself, you can check it out if you want :))
@zuS well you're new out here it's normal, just continue playing and testing new things and you'll get better and better.
hey nice Ta, I made one too if you wanna check
@Turkish001YT you can take a look at my last builds if you want, take the glass parts off and you'll see that every instruments, jauges and buttons are made of fuselage parts
@Turkish001YT first please don't use uppercase letters. And I don't know what you're talking about, there isn't any buttons in SP, we all make them by ourself.
you have 5 followers, not 100
@Turkish001YT buttons ?
also part efficiency doesn't mean low details, just look at my two last builds.
@QuesoAirlines try it !
@UltraLight once again it's a part efficiency challenge, not a mobile friendly challenge.
@Thegrandwosh I don't understand what tou're asking
QUICK REMEMBER it's a part efficiency challenge, not a mobile friendly challenge.
@BaconAircraft only for good builders :))
@LieutenantSOT no
@rexzion just do it again, if it was a long time ago you should be even better now :)
@Chancey21 It's a part efficiency challenge, not a mobile friendly challenge. I want planes with details, but under 1001 parts.
@MisterT No don't
@MineSteve42069 control surfaces aren't details...
@WarHawk95 bah écoute il a l'air bien mais pas non plus incroyable. Bon le modèle de vole ne pourra être que meilleur que le miens mais la shape me dérange déjà, et j'ai peur pour le part count.
I feel like the cockpit doesn't have the right shape, also did you make an interior ? and how many parts is it so far
that's a air brake, mixed with a mirror
@RandomUser09 hmmm impression, so you can like him for his screenshots because it gives you a good impression of him...ok I won't try to understand, just a little remember that you're on internet and that you can't use impression here ;)
@RandomUser09 like him ? who ? and why would you like somebody just for their screenshots and not their builds ?
just learn how to use SP lol
roucouleroucoule
@SimplyPlain I don't need a low part build, I have a pretty good pc too, just saying that you build planes with 1300 parts, without cockpit interiors or even the look of a build with so many parts. By "part efficiency" I don't mean low part builds, but builds where the guy who made them really know how to use parts and reduce the part count :)) your builds aren't ugly tho, and I understand that you do not mind because you have a good pc, but if you post something, it's also for people to enjoy it, at least be able to play with it or you know use it against other builds since it's a war plane. People who know how to do part efficiency are the ones who make good builds, because that's why more impressive than a 1300 parts build without a cockpit. goodnight :)
@Fox00One that's not a touch and go. but meh I feel like you don't really want to understand right ? Just keep in mind that this isn't a good landing and you'll be fine :))
@Fox00One I'm talking about an emergency take-off, when you do a touch down but for some reason you have to take-off directly after it.
@Fox00One even on a runway, if you couldn't land because of a issue you didn't had the place to take-off again oups
that's not what I call a good landing, you're doing the touch down at more than the middle of the runway
make a good gunsight !
looks great, but how many parts ?
@MassiveSimurgh yo
@OPaiTaOn no, a Su 27 is almost 22m long
you can check my Mirage if you want, because the shape isn't really respected on yours
that's not your build right ?
@ChrisPy I hope so
@MisterT gonna report
@MisterT bananiaaaa
@AzureCorp thanks !
haha nice
@ZWLenning if you give me your discord, I can give you my reshade preset
@ZWLenning nope lol