@Simps ok this isn't right, I don't know how you do it but upvotes aren't something you can give or promise like that, et Ninja sympa ton avion :) on voit l'évolution
I'm not quit sure that you can ask for upvotes even is this way.
Landinggear is kinda broken.
Also there's a lot of auto roll and the general shape isn't the one of a Kfir, the plane flys bad and I think that the canards shouldn't move (just like the ones on the Mirage 2000).
the plane would be a good build if it had less parts, I don't care about a 1200+ parts build but only when the build is flaw less (at least in it's shape), also I don't understand the part count with the low poly cockpit (which isn't a bad thing in itself even if it doesn't really work). You could work on the flight model, the plane take to much Gs and acceleration is too fast.
@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo Well yeah the comment section is here so users can comment the plane, maybe it seems rude from your point of view but for us it's just normal, we also have people that only point out issues on our builds and thanks to this our next builds will not have those issues :)
@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo french reviews ? Wasn't I the only french guy to review the plane ? Also being critical isn't a bad thing, if I take the time to make a review it's because I want to help him, give some advices. Also I'm not more "critical all the sudden", it's just that I know this plane more than others so of course I have more things to say. And yeah it's a game, but stop with this excuse, if you want to make a replica you make a replica, otherways you make a fictional version ( which is cool too ).
Jundroo : makes a game where people will be able to share builds
HappyFeetWhyshouldi : ok let's make a 4000 parts plane
ok so let's be serious two minutes, the build is awesome, it does look like the real plane, details are unbelievable just as the custom landing gears, spoilers, control surfaces ect....This build is for sure really REALLY good. BUT there are some flaws : first the part count (yes some people will say "blablabla it's not that bad" but it is !) I know there is a lot of details and custom parts but absolutely NO PART ECONOMY ! Which is a shame for a plane with this ammount of details, for exemple in your jauges each line is ONE part, but you can make two and up to four lines with one part...Also the tail doesn't really look like how it should where the fuselage and the vertical stabilizer meet which is unfortunate for a build of this quality. (And I'm going to say it again, so much parts is great to show what you can do, it's like a piece of art, but high part count doesn't mean good build)
However don't think that I find your build bad, it's magnificent ! Better than a lot of builds :))
@AWESOMENESS360 first I touch both the max speed value and the max input, that's why in my rotator the max speed is "50" (in overload) but the max input is "15" which allows the rotator to spin way faster. And if you want to make an anti-torque you have to put a rotator somewhere hiden in the plane (the rotator must have at least one thing attached to its spinning side) turning in the opposite way of the first one. Then when you did this you have to ajust the max input in the second rotator to make spin faster or less faster so it will make the same torque as the first one but in the opposite way what will make an anti-torque. (If you didn't understand don't be embarrassed about asking, I know my english is shit)
@PolyIsGone to avoid the violent rotation that the hinge rotator makes at high speeds you have to make an anti-torque, actually I cloned this rotating nose and put it somewhere in the plane rotating in the other direction, so they both cancel the torque made by the other one.
@SodiumIodide well your Zero is more like a piece of art, I would never fly it again but it's a true master piece
+1@Simps ok this isn't right, I don't know how you do it but upvotes aren't something you can give or promise like that, et Ninja sympa ton avion :) on voit l'évolution
+1I'm not quit sure that you can ask for upvotes even is this way.
Landinggear is kinda broken.
+1Also there's a lot of auto roll and the general shape isn't the one of a Kfir, the plane flys bad and I think that the canards shouldn't move (just like the ones on the Mirage 2000).
hello I'm a mod there and I don't even know why but I'm beautiful
+1the plane would be a good build if it had less parts, I don't care about a 1200+ parts build but only when the build is flaw less (at least in it's shape), also I don't understand the part count with the low poly cockpit (which isn't a bad thing in itself even if it doesn't really work). You could work on the flight model, the plane take to much Gs and acceleration is too fast.
+1@UltraLight only on the first versions tho
+1@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo true.
+1@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo Well yeah the comment section is here so users can comment the plane, maybe it seems rude from your point of view but for us it's just normal, we also have people that only point out issues on our builds and thanks to this our next builds will not have those issues :)
+1@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo french reviews ? Wasn't I the only french guy to review the plane ? Also being critical isn't a bad thing, if I take the time to make a review it's because I want to help him, give some advices. Also I'm not more "critical all the sudden", it's just that I know this plane more than others so of course I have more things to say. And yeah it's a game, but stop with this excuse, if you want to make a replica you make a replica, otherways you make a fictional version ( which is cool too ).
+1Me, a french guy, is very offended by this mirage that can do a cobra, and why the hell do the build have spics and micro stabs at the rear ???
+1Jundroo : makes a game where people will be able to share builds
HappyFeetWhyshouldi : ok let's make a 4000 parts plane
ok so let's be serious two minutes, the build is awesome, it does look like the real plane, details are unbelievable just as the custom landing gears, spoilers, control surfaces ect....This build is for sure really REALLY good. BUT there are some flaws : first the part count (yes some people will say "blablabla it's not that bad" but it is !) I know there is a lot of details and custom parts but absolutely NO PART ECONOMY ! Which is a shame for a plane with this ammount of details, for exemple in your jauges each line is ONE part, but you can make two and up to four lines with one part...Also the tail doesn't really look like how it should where the fuselage and the vertical stabilizer meet which is unfortunate for a build of this quality. (And I'm going to say it again, so much parts is great to show what you can do, it's like a piece of art, but high part count doesn't mean good build)
+1However don't think that I find your build bad, it's magnificent ! Better than a lot of builds :))
@Urocyon the exact same that make the inside view shift around
+1@Gontar no problem, it's smexy
+1@Invalidar that's weird, just switch between all the views
+1@Eventotaku nah it's not perfect at all but thanks :))
+1@Bernkastel Almost too hot o_O
+1@Ergi yes O_O
+1@Astro12 @Eventotaku
+1Hey these gloom and DOF settings looks nice ;), and this plane...just wow, great work with this !
+1@Thorne np ! you deserve more visibilty out here
+1@Thorne you made something efficiency but with a very good look, it's not easy to make a build with this part count, you have to be smart :)
+1man this so coooool, take that spotlight :))
+1genius
+1best moment = 2:45. It's just so good to see missile from far away
+1@AWESOMENESS360 first I touch both the max speed value and the max input, that's why in my rotator the max speed is "50" (in overload) but the max input is "15" which allows the rotator to spin way faster. And if you want to make an anti-torque you have to put a rotator somewhere hiden in the plane (the rotator must have at least one thing attached to its spinning side) turning in the opposite way of the first one. Then when you did this you have to ajust the max input in the second rotator to make spin faster or less faster so it will make the same torque as the first one but in the opposite way what will make an anti-torque. (If you didn't understand don't be embarrassed about asking, I know my english is shit)
+1@Bernkastel oh well that will make a lot of planes to share
+1@PolyIsGone well actually making a anti-torque was possible with only two parts, and the spiral is made with like not more than 5 parts :)
+1@PolyIsGone to avoid the violent rotation that the hinge rotator makes at high speeds you have to make an anti-torque, actually I cloned this rotating nose and put it somewhere in the plane rotating in the other direction, so they both cancel the torque made by the other one.
+1Damn this is good
+1this is so underrated
+1@rexrexThezion I should have waited a little, for some reason I did this forum in night time just after going out of work I was a little bit tired
+1@MobileMobileTheFriendly happy fox noises
+1hey nice Foxhound
+1why would we hunt you for the part count ? A low part count is always a good thing even more whe the build (like yours) looks good :)
+1@MasterMasterTheAvicenna thx :)
+1@BagelPlane Well just look at my last build (Mig 31) it as a working radar, so well
+1@Cabbage17 I actually said it in the rules
+1@Charris969 just do as you want
+1@Charris969 why ? Don't you like it ? You see on your jetstream what players that you follow sptolighted
+1@Krmo thanks ! I love aviation and video editing, those two things goes pretty well together in SimplePlane :)
+1@Wallaby in three years
+1@F104Deathtrap thanks tho
+1@DarrenIndo thx man !
+1@LucasNicky I'm not, I'm just a random guy enjoying this game :)
+1@Planeacceleration don't touch it, it's already my girlfriend
+1@Kohane344
+1@Inuyasha8215 good mine is going to look really big then
+1Love this plane, glad to see that a builder that I really like did it
+1man I was going to upload mine in 20 minutes ! (just joking)
+1ma futur voiture
+1