@Simps ok this isn't right, I don't know how you do it but upvotes aren't something you can give or promise like that, et Ninja sympa ton avion :) on voit l'évolution
@MIAW26PERSIAN You tested the plane, you made it, how can't you notice the autoroll ? Even if you can't use blueprints, you can still look at pictures of the plane, I'm pretty sure you did but honestly I couldn't recognize the plane without the title. Well at least you know that your planes flys bad, but now you'll have to make them fly good. And for the canards you could have just checked on google, in two minutes you have an answer. I'm not saying that you're bad, you're actually pretty good, even if the plane does not really look like hte original one, you made a good looking plane with less than 200 parts. (I'm not trying to be rude, I just want to help with my stupid english and poor vocabulary :) )
@MIAW26PERSIAN yoyoyo I didn't say that it doesn't deserve an upvote, I just said that asking for upvotes isn't really a thing you can do...meh. Don't twist my words.
@pianobird rules : "Don't beg other users to upvote your stuff." So please don't ever ask again for upvotes (otherways mods will be aware of it), even more if you don't say please.
I'm not quit sure that you can ask for upvotes even is this way.
Landinggear is kinda broken.
Also there's a lot of auto roll and the general shape isn't the one of a Kfir, the plane flys bad and I think that the canards shouldn't move (just like the ones on the Mirage 2000).
@FinX hey hey hey I was just asking at the start, and my objective is just to know what others think not impose my way of thinking. Maybe I sounded like I tried to impose my point of view but that's absolutely not what I want. And discussion is never useless or uneeded. ( @tsampoy I was just exposing my point of view because in the forum I made I haven't talked about people building for upvotes as a motivation, so I got curious and answered).
@AWESOMENESS360 first, no need to call me kid. And you'r saying to me that because you got older and more "mature" you now care about those points ? It's the exact opposite for me, I started playing this game like four years ago and at the start I cared about upvotes and with "maturing" I learned that all this was nothing. Attention is cool, sure, but I only build to share and even if tomorrow all my builds do 0 upvotes I will continue to share and post things. I don't really get how you want more recognition by getting older, I though it was the true kids out here that wanted upvotes before everything else.
@tsampoy @AWESOMENESS360 So upvotes are a reason to build for you, but when you first clicked on the button "download SimplePlanes" you didn't pay the game to have upvotes right ? You first played this game because you like sandboxs and maybe even more planes, generaly you learn about the website and the upvote system later. So what happened to the part of you all that played just to build and share things, because building with upvotes as a motivation is kinda a shame for me.
@UsualPioneer that's all in the "upvote system is broken" topic. I understand what you mean and it's true that some people get a lot of points out of nowhere (sometimes it's legit, sometimes it isn't). It's good that you don't say anything about it, don't get into trouble for nothing. The fact that people don't comment is a problem.
@BagelPlane damn seeing your buids on someone else art work is amazing, that's for me the best thing, you know that he use a play with your build and like it enough to make something (more or less) cool with it.
And yes, there was a time where I did care wayyy too much about points, upvotes and all this stuff. Now I just think about sharing things and want you to have fun with them, and maybe you should do the same :))
@Kennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneth nah it's not that I didn't find it helpful, I don't really need it to be honest, but it would have been cool to explain a little more what you do instade of a timelaps where you can't really figure out what you do. You have to chance to speak english (I would love to make tutorials but my english sucks) and you can make a good looking map in like 30min that's awesome, next step is to explain more precisly (if wanted of course) and change mesh colliders, LOD groups ect so the map become less laggy and use lighter assets.
you don't had any log groups or colliders (or modifie them if the objects that are on the map already have some). It's really a tutorial, it's fun tho, people can see how ou do it fast but nothing is explained. Oh and asking for upvotes is bad.
@ChrisPy ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok I'll stop talking about that ugly plane I'm too lazy to read that :)
@ChrisPy intersting, thanks. But I keep the fact that so much speed isn't that important (but only for the USA, because they have others planes to play with that can do the job better, of course it will become a pain in the ass if it's the only plane of a country).
the plane would be a good build if it had less parts, I don't care about a 1200+ parts build but only when the build is flaw less (at least in it's shape), also I don't understand the part count with the low poly cockpit (which isn't a bad thing in itself even if it doesn't really work). You could work on the flight model, the plane take to much Gs and acceleration is too fast.
@ChrisPy yeah ok but the point is that his plane does reach the Mach speed even though he said it doesn't. Also the F35 don't need to be fast, this plane is made for beyond visual range combats, the contreversy about this plane is more around it's developement.
drama, the plane does actually reach Mach 1 pretty easely, this isn't a problem but don't say it doesn't. I also want to say that ok it's a game and a """"fictional"""""" version of the plane but it's still a F35 so a replica and you can't make a real plane fly like a space craft in star wars
@WileECoyote Fock-Wulf is a brand not a plane, this plane is a Ta 152H (go and check images of the plane and you'll see that the wings does look like this). Don't worry I know how to make replicas ;) also do not say to someone that his build is trash, even more when your builds really could be trash from my view.
@Astro12 I'll take a look at it :) it's good that some players make very low part builds like yours
@Skykid028 read the comments...
@Simps I do know I'm not stupid, but what you do is, upvotes and ranks aren't something you can give like a present, it's not a twitch raid.
@Simps ok this isn't right, I don't know how you do it but upvotes aren't something you can give or promise like that, et Ninja sympa ton avion :) on voit l'évolution
+1@MIAW26PERSIAN You tested the plane, you made it, how can't you notice the autoroll ? Even if you can't use blueprints, you can still look at pictures of the plane, I'm pretty sure you did but honestly I couldn't recognize the plane without the title. Well at least you know that your planes flys bad, but now you'll have to make them fly good. And for the canards you could have just checked on google, in two minutes you have an answer. I'm not saying that you're bad, you're actually pretty good, even if the plane does not really look like hte original one, you made a good looking plane with less than 200 parts. (I'm not trying to be rude, I just want to help with my stupid english and poor vocabulary :) )
@MIAW26PERSIAN yoyoyo I didn't say that it doesn't deserve an upvote, I just said that asking for upvotes isn't really a thing you can do...meh. Don't twist my words.
@pianobird rules : "Don't beg other users to upvote your stuff." So please don't ever ask again for upvotes (otherways mods will be aware of it), even more if you don't say please.
ah yes, the WWI plane with miniguns.
I'm not quit sure that you can ask for upvotes even is this way.
Landinggear is kinda broken.
+1Also there's a lot of auto roll and the general shape isn't the one of a Kfir, the plane flys bad and I think that the canards shouldn't move (just like the ones on the Mirage 2000).
understandable, have a nice day game
@FinX hey hey hey I was just asking at the start, and my objective is just to know what others think not impose my way of thinking. Maybe I sounded like I tried to impose my point of view but that's absolutely not what I want. And discussion is never useless or uneeded. ( @tsampoy I was just exposing my point of view because in the forum I made I haven't talked about people building for upvotes as a motivation, so I got curious and answered).
@tsampoy SP is my fav game, it may be boring for you but for me it's a very funny game :)).
@AWESOMENESS360 first, no need to call me kid. And you'r saying to me that because you got older and more "mature" you now care about those points ? It's the exact opposite for me, I started playing this game like four years ago and at the start I cared about upvotes and with "maturing" I learned that all this was nothing. Attention is cool, sure, but I only build to share and even if tomorrow all my builds do 0 upvotes I will continue to share and post things. I don't really get how you want more recognition by getting older, I though it was the true kids out here that wanted upvotes before everything else.
keep the good work going ! If you continue like this you will make some foufou (cool) things
@dINE Not building a lot isn't a bad thing, just build when you want it, it's a game ot a plane factory.
@tsampoy @AWESOMENESS360 So upvotes are a reason to build for you, but when you first clicked on the button "download SimplePlanes" you didn't pay the game to have upvotes right ? You first played this game because you like sandboxs and maybe even more planes, generaly you learn about the website and the upvote system later. So what happened to the part of you all that played just to build and share things, because building with upvotes as a motivation is kinda a shame for me.
@MrSilverWolf that's exactly what I think.
@UsualPioneer that's all in the "upvote system is broken" topic. I understand what you mean and it's true that some people get a lot of points out of nowhere (sometimes it's legit, sometimes it isn't). It's good that you don't say anything about it, don't get into trouble for nothing. The fact that people don't comment is a problem.
@KnightOfRen It's not fake internet points, it's just that internet points are fake.
@Truckdude8888 check my last plane because it have one, you can take it if you want (and give credit if you use it on a post)
@BagelPlane damn seeing your buids on someone else art work is amazing, that's for me the best thing, you know that he use a play with your build and like it enough to make something (more or less) cool with it.
@rexzion I would not eat my upvotes, if you do this you will lost them.
@SuperRoto So upvotes could be a form of encouragement ? Maybe a little yeah, depends on the person I guess :)
@TriStar I do think the same, it's just internet after all, all this could vanish tomorrow and nobody will remember what you did.
@Sovetskysoyus ....I mean, I knew that somebody would do a comment like this.
And yes, there was a time where I did care wayyy too much about points, upvotes and all this stuff. Now I just think about sharing things and want you to have fun with them, and maybe you should do the same :))
@Brendorkus you do have a big brain uh. Why would mods delete this ? Actually it would be great so it could remove dumb comments like yours.
@PapaKernels he had 4 strikes before that...it was just the too much.
le big vomis (jolie la voiture)
@MrEarth you do have a big brain uh
@Kennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneth nah it's not that I didn't find it helpful, I don't really need it to be honest, but it would have been cool to explain a little more what you do instade of a timelaps where you can't really figure out what you do. You have to chance to speak english (I would love to make tutorials but my english sucks) and you can make a good looking map in like 30min that's awesome, next step is to explain more precisly (if wanted of course) and change mesh colliders, LOD groups ect so the map become less laggy and use lighter assets.
@ChrisPy ugly plane
@ChrisPy cool but I didn't answer because I didn't really continue this discussion -_- at least I know more things about the plane now
hello I'm a mod there and I don't even know why but I'm beautiful
+1you don't had any log groups or colliders (or modifie them if the objects that are on the map already have some). It's really a tutorial, it's fun tho, people can see how ou do it fast but nothing is explained. Oh and asking for upvotes is bad.
@ChrisPy ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok I'll stop talking about that ugly plane I'm too lazy to read that :)
@SyntheticL my bad, I'll delete my comment
+2@ChrisPy that's why the F 35 is a good support jet, not a main combat one
@ChrisPy intersting, thanks. But I keep the fact that so much speed isn't that important (but only for the USA, because they have others planes to play with that can do the job better, of course it will become a pain in the ass if it's the only plane of a country).
the plane would be a good build if it had less parts, I don't care about a 1200+ parts build but only when the build is flaw less (at least in it's shape), also I don't understand the part count with the low poly cockpit (which isn't a bad thing in itself even if it doesn't really work). You could work on the flight model, the plane take to much Gs and acceleration is too fast.
+1@Simps no that """kid""", that's obviously a troll
+3nice troll tho
@MrEarth that's just rude I guess, don't be dumb man
@Homemade1 yeah but he reached more than Mach 1 at sea level so the plane will only be faster with altitude...
@ChrisPy yeah ok but the point is that his plane does reach the Mach speed even though he said it doesn't. Also the F35 don't need to be fast, this plane is made for beyond visual range combats, the contreversy about this plane is more around it's developement.
drama, the plane does actually reach Mach 1 pretty easely, this isn't a problem but don't say it doesn't. I also want to say that ok it's a game and a """"fictional"""""" version of the plane but it's still a F35 so a replica and you can't make a real plane fly like a space craft in star wars
+3@WileECoyote Fock-Wulf is a brand not a plane, this plane is a Ta 152H (go and check images of the plane and you'll see that the wings does look like this). Don't worry I know how to make replicas ;) also do not say to someone that his build is trash, even more when your builds really could be trash from my view.
@Red0Bull don't get cocky tho, I'm not even looking for a Super Hornet, I just said that a plane without ailerons is bruh
@WileECoyote yeah it is :)
@UltraLight fun ? This plane is one of the hardest to make