@EngineerOtaku well you did quit well, I made a Mirage IIIC and know how hard it is to make a good looking and working delta. You can always check out mine if you want some tips or ask for help. Of course your Mirage could have been better but for 300 parts I'm not asking for more.
@toxicgamer88 it's not a bad thing to repost a modified build, but he could have mentionned you or tagged you. Don't forgot that you can always report him to the mod team.
@toxicgamer88 yeah that's what I though, and you sorry your Mirage had a lot of flaws, especially that concave part but I'm not here to talk about yours. (even if this guy seems to have copied this part too)
@WarHawk95 And it kinda looks like that other Mirage 2000 that we make fun of, almost sure that he used piece of the other build or at least copied some parts.
@WarHawk95 even if it is (let me know if it is), it still has a lot of flaws in terms of building, nudging nad some other stuff. But it's pretty impressive for a mobile build.
the take-off speed is pretty high tho, and the roll rate isn't that great compared to the real plane, the speed seems good as such as the pitch (it's realistic but fun enough). You put the trim on the good stab but the central stabs are supposed to open more than the big ones.
just being stupidly curious, di you use parts from my Mirage III C ? If not well it's a pretty great build in appearance, it as some flaws but this plane really isn't easy to make so good job mate :)
@FarrowTECH I work too, and I'm working on my final exams, but I still find some time, for me having fun on this game is learning how to get better and do new things, but do as you want, I'll be happy to see a new plane in this tournament.
this isn't underrated, you could have it look really good even without using 6k parts. It's not like that zero with a thing like 8k parts which is almost more a piece of art than a playable build, this boat isn't "that good looking" for a build with so many parts and not so much features (and I will not talk about the drag points). This is just my opinion tho, hope to see you around with a build in which one I'll see where the parts went.
@Turkish001YT you can take a look at my last builds if you want, take the glass parts off and you'll see that every instruments, jauges and buttons are made of fuselage parts
@Turkish001YT first please don't use uppercase letters. And I don't know what you're talking about, there isn't any buttons in SP, we all make them by ourself.
@WarHawk95 bah écoute il a l'air bien mais pas non plus incroyable. Bon le modèle de vole ne pourra être que meilleur que le miens mais la shape me dérange déjà, et j'ai peur pour le part count.
@EngineerOtaku well ok (I have an i3 too lol)
+1some trails that works with Gs
+1some trails that works with Gs
+1@EngineerOtaku so do better ? if you know it can be better
+1@EngineerOtaku well you did quit well, I made a Mirage IIIC and know how hard it is to make a good looking and working delta. You can always check out mine if you want some tips or ask for help. Of course your Mirage could have been better but for 300 parts I'm not asking for more.
+1@toxicgamer88 it's not a bad thing to repost a modified build, but he could have mentionned you or tagged you. Don't forgot that you can always report him to the mod team.
+1@toxicgamer88 yeah that's what I though, and you sorry your Mirage had a lot of flaws, especially that concave part but I'm not here to talk about yours. (even if this guy seems to have copied this part too)
@1143 you made changes ? so you modified that other Mirage ? I don't really understand
@WarHawk95 And it kinda looks like that other Mirage 2000 that we make fun of, almost sure that he used piece of the other build or at least copied some parts.
+4@WarHawk95 even if it is (let me know if it is), it still has a lot of flaws in terms of building, nudging nad some other stuff. But it's pretty impressive for a mobile build.
+1@IndianAce happy that you noticed the part efficiency :)
@Ruvien0Republic0Engineer that's pretty sad
+1the take-off speed is pretty high tho, and the roll rate isn't that great compared to the real plane, the speed seems good as such as the pitch (it's realistic but fun enough). You put the trim on the good stab but the central stabs are supposed to open more than the big ones.
just being stupidly curious, di you use parts from my Mirage III C ? If not well it's a pretty great build in appearance, it as some flaws but this plane really isn't easy to make so good job mate :)
@asteroidbook345 me sad, my mirage too
@FarrowTECH I work too, and I'm working on my final exams, but I still find some time, for me having fun on this game is learning how to get better and do new things, but do as you want, I'll be happy to see a new plane in this tournament.
@FarrowTECH I never said this challenge was easy tho, everybody can do anything with some patience
+2@FarrowTECH well check other builds intruments and their inputs, you can look at my last one if you want
@aTerra try to do max pitch too then, also put your physics at high
@aTerra so, explain me how EVERYBODY can take off, but not you
@aTerra read the freacking description, why are people here so lazy
the mirage is beautiful, as a french guy I was obligated to make one myself, you can check it out if you want :))
this isn't underrated, you could have it look really good even without using 6k parts. It's not like that zero with a thing like 8k parts which is almost more a piece of art than a playable build, this boat isn't "that good looking" for a build with so many parts and not so much features (and I will not talk about the drag points). This is just my opinion tho, hope to see you around with a build in which one I'll see where the parts went.
+2@TatsuTheCleaningFairy even if the instruments aren't functionnal, it count
+1@chemmey yes, as long as it follow the rules.
+1@Walvis if you want tups for more advances tutorials, I could help you with it (especially everything around part efficiency)
+2@zuS well you're new out here it's normal, just continue playing and testing new things and you'll get better and better.
hey nice Ta, I made one too if you wanna check
@Turkish001YT you can take a look at my last builds if you want, take the glass parts off and you'll see that every instruments, jauges and buttons are made of fuselage parts
@Turkish001YT first please don't use uppercase letters. And I don't know what you're talking about, there isn't any buttons in SP, we all make them by ourself.
you have 5 followers, not 100
@Turkish001YT buttons ?
making a tournament and not even knowing how MP works, that's fun
+3also part efficiency doesn't mean low details, just look at my two last builds.
@QuesoAirlines try it !
@UltraLight once again it's a part efficiency challenge, not a mobile friendly challenge.
@Thegrandwosh I don't understand what tou're asking
@realSavageMan yes
+1QUICK REMEMBER it's a part efficiency challenge, not a mobile friendly challenge.
@BaconAircraft only for good builders :))
@LieutenantSOT no
@rexzion just do it again, if it was a long time ago you should be even better now :)
@Chancey21 It's a part efficiency challenge, not a mobile friendly challenge. I want planes with details, but under 1001 parts.
@MisterT No don't
@WarHawk95 I won't too
+1@MisterT I hope not !
+1@MineSteve42069 control surfaces aren't details...
@WarHawk95 bah écoute il a l'air bien mais pas non plus incroyable. Bon le modèle de vole ne pourra être que meilleur que le miens mais la shape me dérange déjà, et j'ai peur pour le part count.
I feel like the cockpit doesn't have the right shape, also did you make an interior ? and how many parts is it so far
that's a air brake, mixed with a mirror