@LuciferOfPoland Ok. It is your own opinion. I understand it doesn't handle that great, but it does not look autistic. If you didn't know, "autistic" is not a way to describe someone's or something's appearance. Autism is a very serious desease. And what kind of stupid guy says he can't build good planes and goes out of it's way to curse three times a tank from a guy that is currently 1533 points above him? This is like me talking trash about QingyZhou, Sauce, etc. But you know why I don't? Because I respect their builds. I understand that Sauce's Fighting Falcon is extremely complex and impossible to be mobile friendly - but I don't mock that. Your anger managing issues can be easily fixed. Go see a psychologist. It might help you (Seriously - It might). Back to the initial comments about the tank's looks - It looks the way I pictured it to be. If you don't like it, build a better one yourself! If it is because the tank's tracks are made from tires, deal with it. If it is because of the tank's lack of complexity, deal with it. To sum it all up, DEAL WITH IT!
@DerekSP I have my own tug plane (Logiz Tech General Flyer - you can see it in my account) but it still needs some minor mods (MORE PAWAAAAAR and a tug spot)
@JohnnyBoythePilot The 737 is a competitor to the regular A320, not the A321. The 757 always shared it's market with the A321 and both had respectable sales - indicating they should coexist and both are great planes.
@XjayIndustrys Thanks, man! Appreciated it!
+1Nice plane! How 'bout you making a B-1B? Or a B-52? As you like all things supersonic and/or bombers!
@randomusername Ok.
@randomusername I tried but this airframe does not cope with that style of engines.
@randomusername Yeah. It uses a InputController/max=0 T1000 + a InputController/max=.2 BFE300 with exhaustScale=0;0;0 and powerMultiplier .4 (I think)
@ChineseMarxist It is not 1:1 scale (at all)
33rd Wright Navy Regiment
@LuciferOfPoland Ok. It is your own opinion. I understand it doesn't handle that great, but it does not look autistic. If you didn't know, "autistic" is not a way to describe someone's or something's appearance. Autism is a very serious desease. And what kind of stupid guy says he can't build good planes and goes out of it's way to curse three times a tank from a guy that is currently 1533 points above him? This is like me talking trash about QingyZhou, Sauce, etc. But you know why I don't? Because I respect their builds. I understand that Sauce's Fighting Falcon is extremely complex and impossible to be mobile friendly - but I don't mock that. Your anger managing issues can be easily fixed. Go see a psychologist. It might help you (Seriously - It might). Back to the initial comments about the tank's looks - It looks the way I pictured it to be. If you don't like it, build a better one yourself! If it is because the tank's tracks are made from tires, deal with it. If it is because of the tank's lack of complexity, deal with it. To sum it all up, DEAL WITH IT!
+1@LuciferOfPoland Tell me. Now.
@LuciferOfPoland ...?
I hope this wasn't my fault. Your planes were and always will be an inspiration. Farewell.
@DepressedTortoise Thanks!
@DepressedTortoise Did I get it right?
It's either a Chevy Malibu or an Impala
+1@Delosofy Ok.
@Delosofy I saw your Livestream. Soon I will publish a new update on this plane
@PPLLAANNEE thanks
@Delosofy WOW. Thanks!
@AstonMartin145 Thanks!
@EternalDarkness Alright. Sure will!
@EternalDarkness I already installed the mods you listed. The new plane is ready to publish, but I want to make liveries for him.
@EternalDarkness Ok. I'll try to make a better Cessna. But is there a way to mess with fuel burn on XML?
@EternalDarkness Oh. But I don't know how to mod XML code.
@EternalDarkness I know it lacks detail. But it has the same fuel as the real Citation X+. The fuel burn on this aircraft is very high - that's all.
@ThePilotDude I'm sorry I forgot. All credit for the cockpit, wings and rear area (Stabilizers Included) goes to him!
@Minecraftpoweer Ok it is.
@Minecraftpoweer AND if I want a hollow cockpit with nothing inside, I will make it!
@Minecraftpoweer I've studied the roll rates. They match the Q100's roll rate.
@Implosionstrikez OK.
@Othawne Uhhhh.... IDK! But that's what you can call it.
Wow. I didn't know I got 2nd place. Thanks!
It has a lot of detail! But... where is the thrust vectoring?
+2@Implosionstrikez That is.... Uhhhh.......... weird? But... ok I guess.
Isn't the A321 an Airbus?
+1@DerekSP I have my own tug plane (Logiz Tech General Flyer - you can see it in my account) but it still needs some minor mods (MORE PAWAAAAAR and a tug spot)
@DerekSP This glider needs a very powerful tug. I tried your tug and it couldn't take off from Wright Airport.
@Dimkal But how much do 4 parts matter?
@Dimkal Oh... I'll detail it more!
@asteroidbook345 Supported.
@WIZARD2017 Hahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahah
@Jengstrom Oh. Nice explanation!
This is like a twin-engined and twin-rudder F-16, isn't it?
Isn't that the F-35's powerplany?
@DerekSP I've fixed the IP.
What about we discuss this without bias? Some of us prefer Boeing, others prefer Airbus, some don't like either. Let's discuss this imparcially.
@AEGGaming Thanks! My brother said it looks like a mix of a F-22, F-16 , F-18 and F-35. It kinda is.
@JohnnyBoythePilot Meh. The A321 can challenge the 757 and 797.
@jamesPLANESii Yeah.
@JohnnyBoythePilot The 737 is a competitor to the regular A320, not the A321. The 757 always shared it's market with the A321 and both had respectable sales - indicating they should coexist and both are great planes.
Clean design, simple shape, AI and Mobile friendy. Checks all the boxes for a nice "Simple" Plane!