@BARREND120 I just experimented with the computer part based stabilizing system, no build of yours is used on mine and this entire build is purely made by me (except for the FT auto aim code).
Before this i only used gyroscope, which in some cases can be unreliable
@Pluhman2 lol its so easy to kill it, you could just Swiss cheese'd it using a .50 cal, if you do have one though
.
but i do agree it is kinda annoying, plus a cannon that could KILL you
ah yes my favourite game, Warth under
+1Finally, another VR built Catalina that didnt have a very high part count, thats a win :):):):):):)
+1what a weird way to say "aircraft carrier" by saying "aviation cruiser"
+1Gotta love the glowing effect you made, it looks very good
+1fr i thought it was gonne be a very high part bc of the details but holy, its lower than 300 part bro
+1damn, apart from the aircraft itself, that fps view is an amazing thing
+1damn two days ago?
+1how many times did i arrive this early, i like it
this is a beautiful craft, never seen anything this good though
man i never this early, its still in publishing status
+1@IceCraftGaming heres the code though
+1{IAS;0000'<size=60%></mspace>';Speed}
@Dllama4 you can actually make it work underwater, just use xml and make it waterproof
+1so uh I just know how to fix those landing gears...
+1@MetallicBeef6572 @XM803ENJOYER46 a nice thumbnail of your build would lure ppl into upvote and downloading your build cuz it looks sick in the cover
@Pankon i would totally want to do these sometimes, but i probably wont do it in the near future
@blin1blyat oh you see, in the game theres a tab where you can put up blueprints
you can use that as your thumbnail
love the TUSK variant lol
maybe.. around 300-600
peaks to 1200 a day
lol
m1 garand
@BRNavyPilot lol I hope he founds it accurate to WT HSTV-L :)
@BARREND120 yeah
@PhantomBoltSP no doubt, both of your avatar and his avatar are closely related to guest.. almost
or am i having mandela effect rn..?
@BARREND120 nah, im just stating that i didnt use your build in mine, thats all
IS THAT KAMGUYZA I SAW ON THE SECOND PIC
(it kinda looked like him fr)
such well built for just a meme lol
@BARREND120 I just experimented with the computer part based stabilizing system, no build of yours is used on mine and this entire build is purely made by me (except for the FT auto aim code).
Before this i only used gyroscope, which in some cases can be unreliable
@PhantomBoltSP same brah
@ZeroWithSlashedO fast firing shi
@XM803ENJOYER46 thanks for trying it out and giving feedback!
@Unwanted i know he loved this tank, thats why i built it lol
@Rjenteissussy yes fast reload tank
@AviationLoverGEEK444
@LieutenantRodan01
@EagleMan010
@novaskytwt
@Winko
@HordTechnicians
@FLANEFANCY1235
@DeeganishCountryball
@MrOofington
@Christiant2
@TheMouse
@SLSD11ph
@Zero0Two2
@MonsNotTheMonster
@Maluch
@GeneralUnitedSTATS
@B1BLancer
@Apollo018362
@BYardley
@YarisSedan
@Erc90F4RU i see why you asked
its first flight is 1959, but it first introduced in 1964
YEY REPLICA BASED CHALLENGE 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@XM803ENJOYER46 HEY, NOT HERE 💔
@Ghifar nothing.. yet
@ChaseRacliot totally
yippe !!!
pantha with interior
and only for visible ammo detail
damn if this was in the 50s it would be impervious to most american tanks
@GarageWork lol it was just a rough guess, but that sounds interesting..
does the XLR means Xtra Long Range, perhaps bc of it is updated to an advanced FCS
y know what i mean
Ah, a Japanese bomber
may i suggest one, the Nakajima G8N Renzan
yo bro SP2 is in works rn, so just hoping that they would implement a radar system, as you said so
@Pluhman2 lol its so easy to kill it, you could just Swiss cheese'd it using a .50 cal, if you do have one though
.
but i do agree it is kinda annoying, plus a cannon that could KILL you
yoooo this is sick!!
i love it, although it has flaws
you got potential, and i would love to see more of these!