123k asteroidbook345 Comments

  • Venture Aeronautics Project H110 "Metroliner" 3.1 years ago

    The metroliner is an actual thing made by Fairchild, also called the lawn dart

  • All-Terrain Mobility 3.1 years ago

    Ok but can it fly

  • fully mechanical swashplate 3.1 years ago

    I can't seem to get the rotator to go faster even with a sum function, I might try a rotor rpm thing later but we'll see

  • Petition 3.1 years ago

    That’s what the funny tag is for

  • This game is trying to screw with my head 3.1 years ago

    The actual camera parts have an offset you can change. The normal camera kind of just auto centers based on center of mass and like where the cockpit is so it gets weird sometimes

  • Some suggestions for the site and game 3.1 years ago

    @DeveloperKorzalerke yeah I’m not a computer science major I have no clue what I’m talking about

  • Some suggestions for the site and game 3.1 years ago

    @DeveloperKorzalerke it’s probably somewhat similar given that you’re not gonna be able to import an asset that’s not coded in C++

  • MP Tanks!!! 3.1 years ago

    ping issue

  • (SOLVED) Nose Wheel Steering/Drifting Issue: 3.1 years ago

    @TheFlightGuySP no, but moving the main gear back would

  • (SOLVED) Nose Wheel Steering/Drifting Issue: 3.1 years ago

    Move the center of mass forward a little

  • G-91 R-3 3.1 years ago

    Ah yes F-104A

  • New Name… 3.1 years ago

    @Rework huh weird

  • 3D printed RC plane. 3.1 years ago

    Does it actually fly tho

  • Mack MB-600 Old Blue (Mobile Friendly!!) 3.1 years ago

    @ThatOneRoadTrainBuilder19 nice

  • Photorealism in SP [Downloads inside] 3.1 years ago

    @Gandana I had the same problem, I think it has something to do with the fact it's now 5.3 and the guide was written for 4.7

  • Just spamming more pictures of my car. 3.1 years ago

    @Vincent Wonderful advice thank you
    cries in reshade 5.3 when guide is written for 4.7

  • Mack MB-600 Old Blue (Mobile Friendly!!) 3.1 years ago

    @ThatOneRoadTrainBuilder19 no

  • It Ain't Me (Teaser) 3.1 years ago

    @SyntheticL It's called the hueycobra but it's not a huey

  • Just spamming more pictures of my car. 3.1 years ago

    Can I steal some of your reshade skill pls

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @iPilot yeah sure. I’m probably not gonna build the swash plate for some time since my next project has to be done in under a month and I want to dedicate my time to that for now before starting something new

  • It Ain't Me (Teaser) 3.1 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer yeah lmao

  • Typical Multiplayer Experience: 3.1 years ago

    Average SPMP enjoyer

  • wakey wakey 3.1 years ago

    Rexzion part 2

  • M60A2 Starship 3.1 years ago

    I destroyed one of these in war thunder yesterday with my Type 59

  • [TEASER] I HAVE THE 3.1 years ago

    the

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @iPilot I'm making a CH-37 Mojave that had two Wright double Wasp radial engines

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @V yeah that’s an issue for the rotor since rotors spin much faster, especially the tail rotor

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @V from my experience free spinning rotators have an RPM limit for whatever reason, unfortunately I think I’d run into the same issue as using jets. As for the swash plate’s movement I was thinking of only using one piston for the collective and two hinges for the cyclic, all of them hidden in the rotor shaft

  • Gauge Clock 2 3.1 years ago

    @HuskyDynamics01 nice!

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @iPilot it still doesn’t work, there’s a cap on the rotators I think. I can make the rotor start and stop and run out of fuel, it’s just a matter of whether or not I can do autorotation, which might not be entirely possible. I’ll definitely look into it. It’ll probably be more or less constant speed and mostly use the collective for flying

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @iPilot yeah for sure. The collective drag would theoretically be fine because wings you put in it would end up creating drag too. The only problem is I’m not gonna be using a jet since for some reason the rpm ends up being really low regardless of how much power you put on them. So realistically idk what rotor drag would do

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @iPilot sometimes close parts will automatically disable their collisions. Rotators and an FT code wouldn’t be able to respond quickly enough without being really jerky/shaky. You wouldn’t get enough deflection out of the rotators unless they were also super fast at which point the torque would cause pretty bad vibrations. You also might not be able to make odd-number bladed helis. I’m gonna work on my own version and see if it works

  • Mechanical Swashplate & Rotor Physics Discussion 3.1 years ago

    @iPilot you gave me an idea actually and I was thinking I could do it where the only thing controlled by a piston is the collective, so it wouldn’t be quite as wobbly. Getting the plates to slide would be a little difficult though, unless I just did away with the bottom plate and cheated a little. There’s probably a way to do it with FT but you wouldn’t be able to have the rotors spin at a believably fast speed

  • Suspension challenge 3.1 years ago

    So basically I should make some kind of suspension system that keeps a car super smooth with a ton of wheels, probably not hydropneumatic though. I could make something with like 6 wheels that is amazing at traversing off road areas

  • dick plane 3.1 years ago

    Wow penis plane very funny definitely breaks no rules

  • GUY GUY I HAV BIG NEW FOR DA SP 3.1 years ago

    The 1904 News of the World Match Play was the second News of the World Match Play tournament. It was played from Tuesday 4 to Thursday 6 October at Mid-Surrey Golf Club. 32 players competed in a straight knock-out competition, with each match contested over 18 holes, except for the final which was over 36 holes. The winner received £100 out of a total prize fund of £240. J.H. Taylor defeated Alfred Toogood 5 & 3 in the final to win the tournament.
    Entry was restricted to members of the Professional Golfers' Association (PGA). Qualification was by a series of 36-hole stroke-play competitions; one for each of the five PGA sections. The Southern section had 16 qualifiers, the Northern section had 6, the Midland 5, the Scottish section 3 and the Irish section 2.[1] In the event of a tie for places there was a playoff. Compared to 1903 the Northern section had one additional qualifier and the Scottish section one less.

    The qualifiers were:

    Irish section: George Coburn, Johnnie McKenna
    Midland section: George Cawsey, William Hutchings, Willie Lewis, Wilfrid Reid, Tom Williamson
    Northern section: Fred Collins, Phil Gaudin, Sandy Herd, George Pulford, Ted Ray, Tom Simpson
    Southern section: James Braid, Harry Chestney, Ernest Gray, James Hepburn, Willie Hunter, Sr., Rowland Jones, James Kinnell, Arthur Mitchell, Jack Ross, Jack Rowe, J.H. Taylor, Robert Thomson, Albert Tingey, Sr., Alfred Toogood, Harry Vardon, Tom Yeoman
    Scottish section: Willie Fernie, Arnaud Massy, Ben Sayers

  • How Do You Make Text Labels Blink? 3.1 years ago

    @MasterPlanes101 I do not

  • This site's Search Tool is GARBAGE and needs a revamp 3.1 years ago

    @Ren ah. I don’t know if the search function scans all the text on a page including the tags, but it might idk. I just don’t think anyone has made a VR MiG-25 yet

  • How Do You Make Text Labels Blink? 3.1 years ago

    Probably make some kind of looping input that displays nothing for a certain amount of time and then displays the text for a certain amount of time

  • Luftwaffe challenge 3.1 years ago

    I’ve been planning to make a Ju-288, maybe I’ll do that

  • Thanks TRD AKA god of cats 3.1 years ago

    Mfw embed fail

  • Mack MB-600 "Old Blue" 3.1 years ago

    @DogeToTheMoon It has two transmissions and yeah it's weird

  • Mack MB-600 "Old Blue" 3.1 years ago

    @ACEPILOT109 hahaha nice

  • 7.62x51mm NATO (Fixed) 3.1 years ago

    @UPTOSPACE345 ah ok interesting

  • What the plane actually was. 3.1 years ago

    Nothing

  • NAME THAT PLANE!!!!!!! 3.1 years ago

    @XWorks it’s a silhouette of a single engine 5th Gen fighter the only thing that fits that is the F-35

  • NAME THAT PLANE!!!!!!! 3.1 years ago

    @XWorks that’s literally an F-35

  • NAME THAT PLANE!!!!!!! 3.1 years ago

    F-35

  • Mack MB-600 "Old Blue" 3.1 years ago

    @ThatOneRoadTrainBuilder19 I actually didn't disable calculations on anything but yeah most of the parts have 0 drag

  • Mack MB-600 "Old Blue" 3.1 years ago

    @Phoebe nay