I was wondering how to do this and you can do it with a ton of guns but it isn't see-through, and glass just looks weird and is hard to store. I imagine you could make the shields on a borg cube since it's just a cube, but you might as well just make the cube indestructible at that point
I'm wondering if this would be aggravated by more props and that makes me thing how annoying it must have been to take off in World War II bombers with all 4 props rotating in the same direction
Before Bogdan tells me everything I did wrong: I didn't know how to fix the autoroll and I had to eyeball the landing gear so it didn't just clip into the fuselage too badly.
Disadvantages:
Stupidly big
No airport can service it
A lot of engines = a lot of fuel = large carbon footprint
Crazy deck area = high amounts of cleaning = large carbon footprint
Will require a massive runway, probably bigger than even LAX or Atlanta to operate safely
A folding wing on something that large would be a huge structural integrity problem
"Don't upvote!"
+1Gets 29 upvotes
So I can turn any map into a pink and black untextured hellscape
+7@Walvis thanks
@Trainzo I think the wings are a bit large, and the trailing edge isn't perpendicular to the fuselage
@winterro No I know I was just talking
Everybody gangsta till I make a 3000m class 4 tactical cube
I was wondering how to do this and you can do it with a ton of guns but it isn't see-through, and glass just looks weird and is hard to store. I imagine you could make the shields on a borg cube since it's just a cube, but you might as well just make the cube indestructible at that point
I think I'm going to need to give it a gyro because I don't think I can make a self balancing bipedal mech unfortunately. It would be cool though.
I think I figured out how an AT-ST moves, now to make a little prototype thing
+1Very nice, however it seems a little wide. Did you use blueprints?
@AN2Felllla True yeah
@Uchanka Yes
+1Big engine boi
+1@realSavageMan Ok
+1@realSavageMan I gave credit on my MiG-9 I figured since I'm just using it in every soviet plane I make it was fine
@realSavageMan Oh yeah lol
@KLM_747 And the A380 is a failed design
I'm wondering if this would be aggravated by more props and that makes me thing how annoying it must have been to take off in World War II bombers with all 4 props rotating in the same direction
This will make bogdan very angry
+3Did you forget to put insignias on it lol
Before Bogdan tells me everything I did wrong: I didn't know how to fix the autoroll and I had to eyeball the landing gear so it didn't just clip into the fuselage too badly.
Yeah makes sense. Winterro is the best animal builder in sp
+4I hope this is a joke and you're not actually drinking and driving
@JustaSuthernBoy Read
+3I think 1918 made a Pan Am one
+1Then don't name it my airplane
@BogdanX I didn't do any of that nor do I care. All I was told to do was to try and fix the swerving on takeoff, which I minimized.
@Uchanka Ah ok
+1@Uchanka I think they built a couple prototypes though
+1Ohana Airlines though they operate ATR 72-500s
Disadvantages:
+2Stupidly big
No airport can service it
A lot of engines = a lot of fuel = large carbon footprint
Crazy deck area = high amounts of cleaning = large carbon footprint
Will require a massive runway, probably bigger than even LAX or Atlanta to operate safely
A folding wing on something that large would be a huge structural integrity problem
lol
+1MiG-5
Mmmmm yes Battlestar Galactica
Anything can fly with enough engines
+1@IshiMoss Lol kind of. Only one letter off
@Brencool35 Thanks!
@mLk17 Lol it's been removed
@LieutenantSOT Nice thanks
@FerretAeronautics Yes
+1@JeffChandler Yeah but they still produced it in limited numbers
@EngineerOtaku I'll work on it tomorrow
@EngineerOtaku nice
@TheLurkingVexedVortex It's not carrier based lmao
@TheLurkingVexedVortex yes
@KnightOfRen It is a very cool plane. Apparently one was shot down over China
@DripYeager
@Embo
@TheLurkingVexedVortex
To use without heat haze, download, undo, and redo.
@Chaka Nice
Epic, will this be the new main?
+3