Just this video but it's my build instead. Also it uses a water injected J33-A-16 with 5,850lbs of dry thrust and 7,000lbs wet. The video is referring to the original prototype without full trailing edge elevons and a different engine
@Coop09814 no text between the brackets and no spaces. Some pictures don't work I feel like there was a problem at one point where .jpegs don't work but .jpg and .pngs do.
Yes!!!! Something that isn’t a Ford!!! I like that it’s a predecessor to the YC-125, one of my favorite trimotors. I think the discrepancy between photos you’re seeing is the difference between the N-23 and N-32. My guess is the bottom image is the actual N-23 since the engines seem less beefy like the YC-125’s. The N-23 also seems to not have dihedral on the outer wing segments like the N-32 or YC-125 N-23 N-32
@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII see Vincent’s comment, it’s an unwritten rule. Everything the mods do is justified and you will never be able to do anything about it
@SimpleEngineering supersonic wedge
+1Using content from this. Now it's an actual video that I recorded and not a slideshow! Ignore my mouse pls I do not have the skill to get rid of it
Every day we get closer to minecraft in SP
+14@Kangy omg nooooo fbi will raid my house
@Phox yes
Just this video but it's my build instead. Also it uses a water injected J33-A-16 with 5,850lbs of dry thrust and 7,000lbs wet. The video is referring to the original prototype without full trailing edge elevons and a different engine
So it was just the wrong thumbnail lmao
+3@Thecatbaron You'll get no brake fluid from me hahahaha!
tfw you accidentally upload it publicly for several seconds
Most helicopters irl have their rotor fixed tilted forward. Wheeled ones especially since they can run the rotor at lower RPM and taxi with it
+1no
@SheriffHackdogMCPE No 2011 Dell school computer can run that lmfao
+4Yay light tank!
+1@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII Oh ok cool. The 160 one is the main one but it's been down for a while now. I'll make that one my new main
@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII I didn't know that one existed, but
+1160.251.58.13114.49.119.147and
121.174.105.198are all downIt's an Airbus A400M basically, but yeah turboprops aren't fast. Then again they do use C-130s to refuel F-18s sometimes
@SimplePlanesPlayer1 Sounds like a skill issue
+1@ColonelCanada no
+2@SimplePlanesPlayer1 everyone can do XML it's a vanilla feature
+1@Thelegitpilot13 ah ok. I have a ton of ideas if you'd want suggestions to list so people don't have to think about it too hard
You should make an actual post but yes this would be epic
I'm rebuilding it from scratch because I was using bad blueprints
Yeah but it's like
+1lifetimeor something, and then you put in a code relating to the muzzle velocity and target distance@MobileGamer21 Pin comment
@MobileGamer21 ah
@MobileGamer21 what happened to the other 0.5
Long Live the British Empire
+3Guh?????
Probably Andrew or one of the other devs just to put something on the site before a sizeable amount of users joined in
+4it's just greyscale what
@Coop09814 no text between the brackets and no spaces. Some pictures don't work I feel like there was a problem at one point where .jpegs don't work but .jpg and .pngs do.
+2Why did you put the word image between the brackets
+3@XtarsAgency Why did you add spaces
@L3FTxR1GHT jundroo
@L3FTxR1GHT if i remember correctly
Honda once threatened to sue iirc
+1@DatRoadTrainGuy19 yes
+1@Walvis Thank you!
+1@BsetAutomotiveFan2022 bruh
@HuskyDynamics01 oh weird I hadn’t noticed that, they must have modified it throughout its lifetime
Ok AnimeGirlLover2009
Yes!!!! Something that isn’t a Ford!!! I like that it’s a predecessor to the YC-125, one of my favorite trimotors. I think the discrepancy between photos you’re seeing is the difference between the N-23 and N-32. My guess is the bottom image is the actual N-23 since the engines seem less beefy like the YC-125’s. The N-23 also seems to not have dihedral on the outer wing segments like the N-32 or YC-125
+2N-23
N-32
@Vincent indeed
@FairFireFlight bro I’m literally joking lmao
@Anastvats I’m making a joke, obviously it was wrong. I’m just saying don’t try to tell moderators something isn’t justified.
+1@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII trust me, even if it wasn’t justified it wouldn’t be discussed.
@SsKyCoSs it would look like it does irl if they didn’t because the wheels don’t retract all the way
+1@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII see Vincent’s comment, it’s an unwritten rule. Everything the mods do is justified and you will never be able to do anything about it
Why do the rear wheels rotate
+1This is the SP site people don't get to discuss whether or not a ban was justified. The Mods are always right
+6