@Johnnyynf It might just be the way the physics work. I'm no coder, but for example take the formula:
rotation speed cubed=force
with a low amount of force, ex. 1 newton of force = 1 rotation speed
with a high amount of force, ex 5 newtons = 1.7 rotation speed
with a really high amount of force, 20 newtons = 2.7 rotation speed
with 200 newtons force = 5.8 rotation speed
eventually, adding more force barely changes the rotation speed at all, and the graph just looks like a flat line
@TheVexedVortex no but we need to be able to change the angle it curves at. for example if you wanted to place text on that aircraft but rotated 90 degrees from what it is now. you would have to curve it around a different axis in order for it to be able to curve around the fuselage.
I love these content features, I just wish they chose some other builds than only the ones on the front page. I think it should spotlight some smaller/underappreciated builds and creators that should get more attention.
@RC1138Boss i don't think they want to see backlash from something a moderator did on another platform. I'm not saying i agree with it nor am I happy with it, but it is what it is.
@Thunderhawk absolute tragedy. This is tyranny. i have reason to believe this "jundroo" lobbyist has influenced the moderators' hands. #Corruption #MakeSPGreatAgain #Racism #Homophobic
@Tetrodotoxin but aren't you still using multiple parts to build that assembly? Like, yes, they are technically "one part", but it's still made up of multiple parts and therefore takes the same amount of processing power.
@VolcanicAsh uh, no lol. just build the numbers and scale them down. besides, once you've built one gauge you can basically recycle it (with some adjustments like editing the needle)
@FeatherWing yes, but that's what makes parts cause lag. physics for those parts. even if you could "reduce the part count" by combining parts, it's still made up of multiple parts and therefore takes the same amount of processing power.
@ReturnOfJeffChandler true but i was wondering if anyone else thought it would be a cool idea
@Johnnyynf It might just be the way the physics work. I'm no coder, but for example take the formula:
+1rotation speed cubed=force
with a low amount of force, ex. 1 newton of force = 1 rotation speed
with a high amount of force, ex 5 newtons = 1.7 rotation speed
with a really high amount of force, 20 newtons = 2.7 rotation speed
with 200 newtons force = 5.8 rotation speed
eventually, adding more force barely changes the rotation speed at all, and the graph just looks like a flat line
oh no that was just the trailer
Didn't you already post this? or am i just having some weird deja vu type insanity
@gispet it is a beautiful tank
@klm747klm747 awesome engine tho ngl
@KnightOfRen lol
(im such a comedian)
please finish it's beautiful!
+2@TheVexedVortex no but we need to be able to change the angle it curves at. for example if you wanted to place text on that aircraft but rotated 90 degrees from what it is now. you would have to curve it around a different axis in order for it to be able to curve around the fuselage.
also it would be nice if we were equipped with different styles, such as ball and socket, rod end bearing, universal type, and cv type
+1@jamesPLANESii i'm not sure how they would add a "powered" ball join tho. the only type of ball joint that makes sense to me is just floppy.
. . . or maybe just being able to change the angle of the curvature
+1@TheVexedVortex YES WE NEED "HORIZONTAL" CURVATURE
+4@jamesPLANESii how would ball joints remove the part count ?? Though they would be awesome to have . . .
@MintLynx i mean im no coder but im pretty sure stuff like this is pretty standard on unity
SHEESH
droop snoot
...actually it does look like a shoe though lol
+1@Alex9000 your mom is a freaking shoe
also t
last time i checked, walmart brand isn't a synonym for awesome???
@Vincent :D
+1I love these content features, I just wish they chose some other builds than only the ones on the front page. I think it should spotlight some smaller/underappreciated builds and creators that should get more attention.
+5awesomeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
@RC1138Boss i don't think they want to see backlash from something a moderator did on another platform. I'm not saying i agree with it nor am I happy with it, but it is what it is.
+4@PapaKernels nice! definitely very part efficient
@Thunderhawk absolute tragedy. This is tyranny. i have reason to believe this "jundroo" lobbyist has influenced the moderators' hands. #Corruption #MakeSPGreatAgain #Racism #Homophobic
+3shut up and take my upvote
@PapaKernels :O
ALMOST PLATTT!!!!
+1dont smoke lol
+2nice flying cancer stick!
+2@DeezDucks lol, paneling will always have a special place in our hearts tho.
more than 100 part make game lag!!!!!!11!!!1!
@Tetrodotoxin but aren't you still using multiple parts to build that assembly? Like, yes, they are technically "one part", but it's still made up of multiple parts and therefore takes the same amount of processing power.
@idk201011323 I agree, but without the windmills. maywar with the windmills enabled is enough to make my pc struggle
@VolcanicAsh uh, no lol. just build the numbers and scale them down. besides, once you've built one gauge you can basically recycle it (with some adjustments like editing the needle)
Also please make a trim option that has no trim or "back plate" so we can just nudge the guage into our own custom trims!!!
@AN2Felllla really? building the guages tends to be really easy for me, but fitting them into the guage cluster and making them fit is the hard part
@Lightningtreesavoralt *what separated people who have lives from people who don't
+11@FabioGalvao5679 not sure but likely before the end of 2021
+2hey, i'm not compaining but it would be awesome if we could have an rpm gauge / tachometer option
+2@Strikercritsilver both.
+1Lol why did the best plane on the site get removed
why did people actually read this like what the h*ck
@AWESOMENESS360 very funny
@KnightOfRen https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/035/425/notokiedokiecover1.jpg
+6@FeatherWing yes, but that's what makes parts cause lag. physics for those parts. even if you could "reduce the part count" by combining parts, it's still made up of multiple parts and therefore takes the same amount of processing power.
shocks with adjustable compression damper AND rebound damper
+7