@NobleMobileUser yes, me too.. I build them from memory. But keep in mind to add dihedrals and staff like that detail. Even if you are not ready with the fuselage wings
@Type2volkswagen Ouch, that even more uncommon for 1930s. since contra rotating props uses more complex gearbox, which 2 engines are running on a same drive shaft- they mostly came out in the late 40s and 50s with powerful engines (like Tu 95 and Avro Shackleton) - any way ,,, this is a fictional after all, nice work.
@beenz I am using the smooth fuselage now. thanks for the reminder
+1@MrCOPTY thanks
+1This is a very safe plane to fly. I can land safely only with one engine. Great build @MrCOPTY. Congrats and Spotlights!
+1Impressive, beautiful build
+1@MrKtheguy thank you friend
+1that is sad
+1Nice build my friend
+1nice
+1@WolfHunter9111, awesome, great job. @Zaineman
+1@Rework Lol. Thank you mate!
+1nice work, came out nice with just 100 parts.
+1@Deeznutz10182 That's true, be gentle, don't fly it like a fighter plane, it is a gentle bomber; just to deliver the "payload" to the destination
+1@Zaineman @MrCOPTY @GrizzlitnCFSP
+1@Rework Thank you so much, yes, so far it is my best build.
+1@NobleMobileUser yes, me too.. I build them from memory. But keep in mind to add dihedrals and staff like that detail. Even if you are not ready with the fuselage wings
+1Ahhhh. This is cute
+1@MrCOPTY wait, what? Lol
+1Nice, I love that plane. I also got one from @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL
+1@Krikkit42 congratulations
+1well done!
+1I have not much enough plane to upvote for you, So I spotlight your planes.
+1this is awesome, I wanna build one too
+1@Type2volkswagen Thanks so much for sending the PDF, I am a big fan of Contra Rotating Props
+1@Type2volkswagen Ouch, that even more uncommon for 1930s. since contra rotating props uses more complex gearbox, which 2 engines are running on a same drive shaft- they mostly came out in the late 40s and 50s with powerful engines (like Tu 95 and Avro Shackleton) - any way ,,, this is a fictional after all, nice work.
+1Nice
+1This plane got realistic flight characteristic
+1this is very a nice build
+1Lol, yes I will...@beenz
+1Great work.
+1nice
+1this is a cute one, Love those details on the radial engine
+1It is still 15th August in New York. So it is good to post, check the international standard times @ChamDel78
+1I had tried some pusher props, and I know it is harder than building a jet.
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/nNQzo1/F4U-Reversed
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/LK9lJt/Seagull-Mark-1
This is a great job. If I use this, I will credit you. Thanks for sharing
+1America’s Ju52. I saw that at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington DC. It was an interesting one. The windshield design too.
+1@Rework thats good. So that we can spot each other
+1Awesome build my friend
+1T3
+1Thank you! @MrCOPTY
+1@ColonelCanada look at this one https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/c0huy1/Air-spray-lockheed-L188-electra-memorial-of-C-GFQA go into the XML and you will see the color of the water. tracerColor: 00BFFF. In his case, he use a wing gun instead of flares
+1nice one, especially I like the planes you choose to build.
+1AAAAAAAaaaaa are you burning the crops? anyway, that looks cool.
+1@Rework, thanks for the Spot
+1Thanks @DeveloperKorzalerke
+1@X99STRIKER Yes, looks ugly, but I love some ugly ones - lol
+1"'Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder"
@Zaineman @GrizzlitnCFSP @MrCopty
+1@Rework Thank you!
+1Good job
+1Ah,,,, there you go - this is true @ColonelCanada
+1Noooooooo
+1