@Christiant2 ah! My pleasure. I help anyone as far as I can. My favorite player??? That’s a tough choice. There are many great players in this game no matter the rank is.
@BRNavyPilot Thanks, but it's not a super detailed one. I just built with under 90 parts so far. You can call it PEA, as @Monarchii called it - and 5 wings. Which would also be AI traffic as well.
@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
looks good!
+1super cool Super Étendard. Great details
+1interesting
+1@Christiant2 ah! My pleasure. I help anyone as far as I can. My favorite player??? That’s a tough choice. There are many great players in this game no matter the rank is.
+1for me, I did not commit anything. Sometimes, I build with a detailed cockpit; sometimes, I do not. And even sometimes I make "block builds," lol
+1Hay My Good old friend Z...
+1@Christiant2 good job. Keep it up.
+1@ItzzsilversXD Thank you, still learning,,, lol
+1@ItzzsilversXD you got a MiG25 on your profile!
+1@Christiant2 anything you love to
+1In reality, it is a freehand build Fokker-27/50. So I give the new name "Gabbiano"
+1@cyon Thank you. check out my Instagram Wins_wings, where I post some watercolors, pen and ink, and also digital paintings.
+1@Christiant2
+1@Christiant2, not Mi-4, but a similar concept from the same era
+1@Christiant2 not Mi-4, but similar concept from the same era
+1the color combinations are elegant. Great job.
+1@Boeing727200F if you make fictional, make sure it represents the era and your description.
+1@Christiant2 You got it
+1beautiful flying wings
+1@Christiant2 okay, I will do something again, what plane/heli do you want to see? I will draw and post it for you
+1@Christiant2
+1@BRNavyPilot Thanks, but it's not a super detailed one. I just built with under 90 parts so far. You can call it PEA, as @Monarchii called it - and 5 wings. Which would also be AI traffic as well.
+1great work, love it
+1@Saturn0 no worry, so I cut is short at 3 minutes. Lol. And good luck with your math tomorrow. Best form Brooklyn, New York!
+1@Monarchii I wish you were here in the US. I have good amount of museums to visit. And can’t finish one in a day
+1@Monarchii thanks, lol,,, It based on Do-31E
+1@IQinventory thank you
+1@windshifter1 @XProAerospaceAircrafts @IQinventory
+1nice
+1@LieutenantSOT no problem. XFR1 is still fine
+1@LieutenantSOT well as it is in the "grey area" do it if you love it. Make sure you put both Jet and piston engines - lov to see
+1very nice - lov the graphics and letterings too
+1@Thatrando current one had unguided rockets, total of 28 in two rocket pods
+1thanks for joining!
+1Nice looking Flanker
+1Noice!
+1nice work. thanks for joining
+1@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
+1@Mosquitowithagun yes
+1@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Lol :P a little bit of flesh
+1Thank you @Jaspy190 , that is fast
+1@IQinventory sure. Please ask them
+1@Dragoranos I consider both planes design started in the late 1930s or early 40s. I am looking something after 1945 to date. Thanks for asking
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
+1@Apollo018362 @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 we got to join each other - lol
+1Spotlighted! Oops. we both did in the same day. May be I have to join you and you got to join my challenge. Lol
+1@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
+1@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
+1I saw two C-119s at the Air Mobility Command Museum last year. It is big. The landing gear was interesting.
+1