@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
@Christiant2 well, may be a bit similar, But Tornado is a much larger fighter and also had a variable geomatry wings (like F-14, F111, MiG23). Alphajet is a small trainer.
@VietnameseGuysWithTheAK I have never thought of that. But it is an interesting thought. Let me think of it. If anyone knows how to plant the island on the specific coordinate on the map. I imagine a fortified small island with a helipad or a short airstrip. Well,,, something like China building a man-made island in the middle of the Pacific
Nice build. I saw this in the Air and Space Museum in Washington, DC. It was one majestic plane to look at. Placed around a tri-motor plane (maybe a Junkers Ju-52)
Nice looking Flanker
+1Noice!
+1nice work. thanks for joining
+1@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
+1@Mosquitowithagun yes
+1@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Lol :P a little bit of flesh
+1Thank you @Jaspy190 , that is fast
+1@IQinventory sure. Please ask them
+1@Dragoranos I consider both planes design started in the late 1930s or early 40s. I am looking something after 1945 to date. Thanks for asking
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
+1@Apollo018362 @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 we got to join each other - lol
+1Spotlighted! Oops. we both did in the same day. May be I have to join you and you got to join my challenge. Lol
+1@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
+1@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
+1I saw two C-119s at the Air Mobility Command Museum last year. It is big. The landing gear was interesting.
+1and wow, you were here 8.8 years ago. And welcome back!
+1your tanks are spot on!
+1Congratulation
+1@Christiant2 well, may be a bit similar, But Tornado is a much larger fighter and also had a variable geomatry wings (like F-14, F111, MiG23). Alphajet is a small trainer.
+1@DrakonDynamics You got a nice logo, by the way - also the typography. I guess you did it yourself
+1Interesting challenge especially with your Story background and awesome world map. Highlighted for more to notice - and good luck!
+1love the engine nacelles
+1nice work - thanks for sharing
+1@RealMicroZackSP sure, I will be waiting. tag me
+1Thank you guys! @IQinventory @Liquidfox01 @Trainzo
+1@Christiant2 @Mosquitowithagun thank you guys
+1@KSB24 Thanks, well, I am a graphic designer/visual artist for a living.
+1@Christiant2 I am not sure about those. I got to test and see. And thank you!
+1@overlord5453 I see , thank you
+1@Victoriouswings, which is another website?
+1@VietnameseGuysWithTheAK I have never thought of that. But it is an interesting thought. Let me think of it. If anyone knows how to plant the island on the specific coordinate on the map. I imagine a fortified small island with a helipad or a short airstrip. Well,,, something like China building a man-made island in the middle of the Pacific
+1Looking good! Congratulations on Platinum.
+1This is so good. I am a big fan of VTOLS
+1wow, I got to vote for the incredible description - this is a great reference for all
+1good job
+1@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer True, because I was not following strictly and building loosely.
+1@Boeing727200F Lol, thank you guys! @Solent19
+1@DARKSKIES, it is fine on my iPad and iPhone. What happens to you?
+1Nice build. I saw this in the Air and Space Museum in Washington, DC. It was one majestic plane to look at. Placed around a tri-motor plane (maybe a Junkers Ju-52)
+1Tag Requests: @Kerbango @maddoge @Victoriouswings
+1@BRNavyPilot I am glad that I could solve something for you
+1@GuardianAerospace sounds amazing
+1looking good
+1is this still running? when is the deadline to end the challenge?
+1@Blackbird7
T this cockpit is so cool
+1@HummilteDesignBureau thanks
+1awesome, love your builds all the time
+1Every things that makes you happy is good - that is what I do. I do what pleased me.
+1@Christiant2 Thanks, yes, F20/F5 + well, but I make the horizontal stabilizers look British -
+1