@Christiant2 You can add so many more parts since this plane is made out of only 82 parts. You can of course add many more details if you want. There are many planes made out of 1500 to 3000 parts on this website. You will see. I have to stick with a low part count since I do not have much time to spend on one project. I work full-time.
@overlord5453 No, I down't want to restrict (changing the mass and drag to zero) but not to over do it. which ruins the reality when it is over do. The planes fly like a balloon rather than "heavier than air" aircraft.
@GeneralCorpInc
Good idea with your concept, and thanks for joining. Here is my input that may be helpful for your future builds.
- I consider your build as quite a modern design built between 1980-2010 by looking at the nosecone and style of the aircraft. Also, the blade style "Scimitar" (which is a modern one) will usually paired with a turbo-prop engine. So using an (old-fashioned) radial piston engine looks a bit off to me. Not many people will be picky about it, but just sharing my knowledge. Have fun and appreciate for joining.
Lol, como'n give me time to write something... Lol
+1Yes, hypersonic
+1nostalgic
+1nice work, beautiful art work too.
+1@Christiant2 thanks.
+1@TheRealGoober The is very kind of you. I add the link to your page by the way.
+1@TheRealGoober Look, updated.
+1@TheRealGoober still writing the content
+1@TheRealGoober I am writing a thank you note for your smoke device -
+1@TheRealGoober I add the smoke trail - ready to fly this time. Thank you by the way
+1@Mustang51 nice. I used to build 1/72 and 1/48 model kits
+1great build my friend
+1@B25mitchel @GuardianAerospace Guys, tanks, and yes, this is the plane once it shot down itself
+1@Christiant2 I see, you mean you want more weapons on the plane?
+1@Christiant2 by the way, your link "this" was not working, so i don't know which plane you are showing to me
+1@Christiant2 You can add so many more parts since this plane is made out of only 82 parts. You can of course add many more details if you want. There are many planes made out of 1500 to 3000 parts on this website. You will see. I have to stick with a low part count since I do not have much time to spend on one project. I work full-time.
+1@dekanii yes. It happened. Find it on YouTube.
+1@TTL No. Just under 2.7 years as of Nov/2024
+1@Christiant2 All yours! rebuild it, break it make it again. re paint it. post it. I am so glad to know that.
+1Thanks for the super fast upvotes.
+1@F8boa will do next time. noted
+1@overlord5453 Thanks, will do next time
+1@Monarchii yes, I have read about that once. I believe Ki-61 also got a German engine (licensed copy) or such.
+1@Monarchii I see. Shape wise, I prefer the P40 look of the Ki-61
+1@Thatrano @ThomasRoderick @Ethansimmons04
+1@Christiant2 @GuardianAerospace @KPLBall
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @upperflat @imakestuffsometimes
+1@Monarchii I think you are looking this one >>> Ki-61 which uses the inline engine and not the radial engine.
+1@AviadorArgentino no problem
+1spotlighted! good luck with the challenge.
+1Huh, I got to push this challenge up so that more people may join. Currently, it is very quiet
+1@MrCOPTY you could improve the cockpit details and repost it if you want
+1Thanks @DoughDough5 that is so fast, 2 seconds after upload
+1beautiful work my friend
+1awesome
+1Merhaba! Looks nice
+1@MrCOPTY yes
+1@MrCOPTY same here... lots of idea, but not much time to play
+1@overlord5453 No, I down't want to restrict (changing the mass and drag to zero) but not to over do it. which ruins the reality when it is over do. The planes fly like a balloon rather than "heavier than air" aircraft.
+1Great plane to fly.
+1@airlinerbuilder Yes, very little
+1@GeneralCorpInc
+1Good idea with your concept, and thanks for joining. Here is my input that may be helpful for your future builds.
- I consider your build as quite a modern design built between 1980-2010 by looking at the nosecone and style of the aircraft. Also, the blade style "Scimitar" (which is a modern one) will usually paired with a turbo-prop engine. So using an (old-fashioned) radial piston engine looks a bit off to me. Not many people will be picky about it, but just sharing my knowledge. Have fun and appreciate for joining.
@GeneralCorpInc thanks for your understanding
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I am working on it
+1@Christiant2 you mean the NAVY museum? I will try
+1@IQinventory hope you got to visit soon
+1Nice and fun to fly
+1@Christiant2 It is not a UFO buddy, it was a VTOL craft from the 50s, whih was not successful and stopped at the testing stage
+1@TTL i see
+1this is a notable work. Great job, added to my favorite now
+1