Greyhound II - US Navy carrier supply transport aircraft with VTOL capability - to be enter into service in the near future, to replace the aging Greyhounds and some V-22 Ospreys.
Great job. Bonus point for bringing up a rear aircraft - besides, it is super maneuverable, STOL and also handle low speed very well. Great job. Spotlighted.
@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries, that's fine. Even if you never leave the drawing board, still if you follow the drawing, it is a replica. By the way, reading your bio, have you ever grown up in a Socialist country? because that is how I grew up as a kid.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
nice!
@Numbers2 Shoot it down, baby!
nice
+1@LieutenantSOT no problem. XFR1 is still fine
+1keep up the nice work
@LieutenantSOT well as it is in the "grey area" do it if you love it. Make sure you put both Jet and piston engines - lov to see
+1@Thatrando Yes, do it and post it as a successor, so that everyone could enjoy your update.
Greyhound II - US Navy carrier supply transport aircraft with VTOL capability - to be enter into service in the near future, to replace the aging Greyhounds and some V-22 Ospreys.
NOW POSTED!
Thanks for the upvotes!
@RamboJutter Lol, Spotlight is a rare case for a guy like you and me these days. Not many people can do it for us.
very nice - lov the graphics and letterings too
+1very cool
This is such a great work @L1nus
@Thatrando current one had unguided rockets, total of 28 in two rocket pods
+1@Thatrando Did you mean unguided rockets?
thanks for joining. Good luck with the challenge
thanks for joining!
+1@SpiritDesignBureau ALL top 3 builder will get 9 upvotes & 3 spots
@Ian1231100 yes
Nice looking Flanker
+1Love this
Great job. Bonus point for bringing up a rear aircraft - besides, it is super maneuverable, STOL and also handle low speed very well. Great job. Spotlighted.
Noice!
+1@CaptainBrayden thanks for joining
thank you Mod @Seeras
Well done. Thanks for joining
nice work. thanks for joining
+1@florky all three are now old bro, But I love D80 from that era. D4 is still a beast though
Oh, another camera nerd, why don't you do Zf
Great job @Rambojutter the colors are spot on.
@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
+1@Halcyon215 ∴⍑ᔑℸ ̣ ᔑ∷ᒷ ||𝙹⚍ ℸᔑlking ᔑʖ𝙹⚍ℸ ̣ ?
@Mosquitowithagun yes
+1@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries Yah, it is
@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
+1@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries Burma/Myanmar
@NordicAerospace READ! please
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries, that's fine. Even if you never leave the drawing board, still if you follow the drawing, it is a replica. By the way, reading your bio, have you ever grown up in a Socialist country? because that is how I grew up as a kid.
Awesome! you pass the first test. Spotlighted and upvoted. Good luck for the challenge
+2@AndiTontrando no problem
awesome build.
this plane was on my bucket list to build too.
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Lol :P a little bit of flesh
+1Thank You! @Liquidfox01 @ ShinyGemsBro @LunarEclipseSP
+2Thank you @Jaspy190 , that is fast
+1@IQinventory sure. Please ask them
+1@Victoriouswings yes. Make sure the fictional one matches the era
@Dragoranos I consider both planes design started in the late 1930s or early 40s. I am looking something after 1945 to date. Thanks for asking
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
+1@TheAerospacecraftNerd77 sorry for this time, I have some work outside to do
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 good. Now I see. Spotlighted. Good luck with your chellenge
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 really, I did not see it