Great job. Bonus point for bringing up a rear aircraft - besides, it is super maneuverable, STOL and also handle low speed very well. Great job. Spotlighted.
@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries, that's fine. Even if you never leave the drawing board, still if you follow the drawing, it is a replica. By the way, reading your bio, have you ever grown up in a Socialist country? because that is how I grew up as a kid.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
@Thatrando current one had unguided rockets, total of 28 in two rocket pods
+1@Thatrando Did you mean unguided rockets?
thanks for joining. Good luck with the challenge
thanks for joining!
+1@SpiritDesignBureau ALL top 3 builder will get 9 upvotes & 3 spots
@Ian1231100 yes
Nice looking Flanker
+1Love this
Great job. Bonus point for bringing up a rear aircraft - besides, it is super maneuverable, STOL and also handle low speed very well. Great job. Spotlighted.
Noice!
+1@CaptainBrayden thanks for joining
thank you Mod @Seeras
Well done. Thanks for joining
nice work. thanks for joining
+1@florky all three are now old bro, But I love D80 from that era. D4 is still a beast though
Oh, another camera nerd, why don't you do Zf
Great job @Rambojutter the colors are spot on.
@363636 Airplanes were designed to meet the specific military needs of a country, influenced by its political agenda. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure science" when it comes to the colors, markings, symbols, and graphics on these aircraft. Some symbols may be offensive to certain groups. However, without these symbols, the airplanes might lack authenticity. While I DO NOT SUPPORT any ideas or groups that go against humanity, I believe people should confront reality and not censor the true facts from the past or present.
+1@Halcyon215 ∴⍑ᔑℸ ̣ ᔑ∷ᒷ ||𝙹⚍ ℸᔑlking ᔑʖ𝙹⚍ℸ ̣ ?
@Mosquitowithagun yes
+1@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries Yah, it is
@IQinventory Reminder, Until your plane is not a successor, I can't put it in the challenge. (Well, you can't do "Remote Boxing" or "Run form Home" for Olympic)
+1@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries Burma/Myanmar
@NordicAerospace READ! please
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries, that's fine. Even if you never leave the drawing board, still if you follow the drawing, it is a replica. By the way, reading your bio, have you ever grown up in a Socialist country? because that is how I grew up as a kid.
Awesome! you pass the first test. Spotlighted and upvoted. Good luck for the challenge
+2@AndiTontrando no problem
awesome build.
this plane was on my bucket list to build too.
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Lol :P a little bit of flesh
+1Thank You! @Liquidfox01 @ ShinyGemsBro @LunarEclipseSP
+2Thank you @Jaspy190 , that is fast
+1@IQinventory sure. Please ask them
+1@Victoriouswings yes. Make sure the fictional one matches the era
@Dragoranos I consider both planes design started in the late 1930s or early 40s. I am looking something after 1945 to date. Thanks for asking
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
+1@TheAerospacecraftNerd77 sorry for this time, I have some work outside to do
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 good. Now I see. Spotlighted. Good luck with your chellenge
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 really, I did not see it
Once you upload, EVERY DECENT BUILD WILL GET AN UPVOTE, and Good ones may get a SPOT
@Apollo018362 @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 we got to join each other - lol
+1Spotlighted! Oops. we both did in the same day. May be I have to join you and you got to join my challenge. Lol
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 that is fast like an SR-71
@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
+1wow looks nice
balls connected to form a line .... Line Ball LOL
@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
+1I saw two C-119s at the Air Mobility Command Museum last year. It is big. The landing gear was interesting.
+1@kumoroha165 I can see in the details your work. Awesome. well, I wasn't on Twitter for a long time, since it became X
and wow, you were here 8.8 years ago. And welcome back!
+1nice smooth F16. great build
+3