@Gastonplanes I have try your plane. it can land, but can not take off. (I add the landing gears) you need to build bigger. One reason is because it is too small - It is too light and can not control. Also you got to play with the landing gear positions too
@NobleMobileUser yes, me too.. I build them from memory. But keep in mind to add dihedrals and staff like that detail. Even if you are not ready with the fuselage wings
Thank you all, and I hope everyone enjoys it! I am posting the UPVOTES to the winners, as well as to the Honorable mentions too. Please do not feel bad if you do not win this - it is just for fun and put it as my mistake, and I wish everyone happy and I respect every one of you.
@Type2volkswagen Ouch, that even more uncommon for 1930s. since contra rotating props uses more complex gearbox, which 2 engines are running on a same drive shaft- they mostly came out in the late 40s and 50s with powerful engines (like Tu 95 and Avro Shackleton) - any way ,,, this is a fictional after all, nice work.
Looks very cool reverse layout. Only small reminder for your info, 5 bladed props are not so common in 1933. Most of them are 2 bladed wooden props, and some 3 bladed ones- even 4 bladed are rare.
@SchadeAircaftCompany Sorry for my late reply, I was away for a trip. I will spotlight, and try to promote as much as I can. Spread out your facts in separate headings, and make them easy to read.
that is sad
+1Nice build my friend
+1nice
+1@IDNSatyaBUKANNova Great job, nice details. I would spotlight for you
Thanks @ChiChiWerx, @Zaineman
@WolfHunter9111, awesome, great job. @Zaineman
+1@Gastonplanes I have try your plane. it can land, but can not take off. (I add the landing gears) you need to build bigger. One reason is because it is too small - It is too light and can not control. Also you got to play with the landing gear positions too
This is my other asymmetrical plane >>>
I have posted a short video for this plane: Flight of the W2000
If you want to try the plane, Visit to W2000 page: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/b7s4rp/WinsWings-W2000
Hi Hello Hola Harley Harley-Davidson!
+3nice
@Rework Lol. Thank you mate!
+1nice work, came out nice with just 100 parts.
+1awesome, I love it,
Thanks for sharing, that is very helpful. @Zaineman
Visit Kalinin K-12 page/ Download
You did it! I have tried before and never succeeded. I wonder how did you get away without getting shot down by that crazy SAM
@Deeznutz10182 That's true, be gentle, don't fly it like a fighter plane, it is a gentle bomber; just to deliver the "payload" to the destination
+1Thanks @Zaineman
@Zaineman @MrCOPTY @GrizzlitnCFSP
+1@Rework Thank you so much, yes, so far it is my best build.
+1Great
@TWDDerSharkmarine my pleasure, welcome for the next challenge
@NobleMobileUser yes, me too.. I build them from memory. But keep in mind to add dihedrals and staff like that detail. Even if you are not ready with the fuselage wings
+1Ahhhh. This is cute
+1Oh I see, good drawing @MrCOPTY
Okay @TheCommentaryGuy , your wish has approved. Oh.. but I could not change any more… it was "curated" now
@MrCOPTY wait, what? Lol
+1@SimplyWorking I love your Su25 too. It was almost a winning plane
Nice, I love that plane. I also got one from @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL
+1@Krikkit42 congratulations
+1@Zaineman @Rocketguy2079 Thank you guys
Visit AH66 at this link: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/DEN6Q8/AH-66-Blackfeet
well done!
+1I have not much enough plane to upvote for you, So I spotlight your planes.
+1this is awesome, I wanna build one too
+1So the WINNERS are....
1st Place: Bell-P-39-Airacobra
by @Seemeing
24/30 points
2nd Place: 95-Part-Trainer-Aircraft
by @Rework
23/30 points
3rd Place: Harpy F.2 AASF
by @Krikkit42
21/30 points
Best Voted aircraft by all: F-100D-Super-Saber
by @MrCOPTY
Honorable mentions: F-16-Fighting-Falcon-100-part
by @Raiquaza19AirComp
Thank you all, and I hope everyone enjoys it! I am posting the UPVOTES to the winners, as well as to the Honorable mentions too. Please do not feel bad if you do not win this - it is just for fun and put it as my mistake, and I wish everyone happy and I respect every one of you.
@Type2volkswagen Thanks so much for sending the PDF, I am a big fan of Contra Rotating Props
+1may be I will join if I get some idea
@SchadeAircaftCompany glad to know that
@Type2volkswagen Ouch, that even more uncommon for 1930s. since contra rotating props uses more complex gearbox, which 2 engines are running on a same drive shaft- they mostly came out in the late 40s and 50s with powerful engines (like Tu 95 and Avro Shackleton) - any way ,,, this is a fictional after all, nice work.
+1awesome
Looks very cool reverse layout. Only small reminder for your info, 5 bladed props are not so common in 1933. Most of them are 2 bladed wooden props, and some 3 bladed ones- even 4 bladed are rare.
@SchadeAircaftCompany Sorry for my late reply, I was away for a trip. I will spotlight, and try to promote as much as I can. Spread out your facts in separate headings, and make them easy to read.
Nice
+1This plane got realistic flight characteristic
+1My full time job is a Graphic Designer/Artist @XWorks
I am posting the Winners in 1-2 days, I have a full-time job and got a tight schedule. @XWorks
this is very a nice build
+1@Zaineman did you try the machine gun control?