@Panzerwaifu69 I was hoping you got the #1st place, I am sorry. But I vote for you personally. It is a fun one. Yes, B36 is the best example. Always keep the engines towards the main fuselage. The horizontal stabilizers need some sweep angle to match the wing sweep too. Also, I would put a 4-wheel bogie instead of 2 landing gear. (or) check the Heinkel He 177 landing gear that is cool. It is a heavy bomber about the size of this fictional one you are building
This is one of the nicest plane to fly during the challenge. I love that pusher propeller too. It will be great if the engines are sticking together towards the fuselage (center line of thrust) like the real ones. And landing gear placement.
It is.a nice plane to fly. But 900mph is too fast for WW2, which the haven’t passed the sound barrier (764mph) at that time. And no prop fighters do. That’s why. Historic facts bring you points @ChamDel78
I try my best to judge the builds from the engineering point of view - and believable the built (no matter replica or fictional) gets more points. Speed, engine placements and historical accuracy gain more points.
I am upvoting you all as soon as I can. Thank you very much for joining.
Thank you all for upvote this again. I want to edit and improve the horizontal stabilizers from the pervious plane. So I have update and delete the pervious post. I don’t want to keep too many similar ones - @Reworkable @Aviator01 @Echoster @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL @T8flight @BeastHunter @Shimamurahougetsu @Bryan5
Lol, cockpit is not really my interest, I just did something "acceptable ones" only @Reworkable my main focus is on airplanes and different flight technology
With auto wing sweep, you don't need to shift the wing position manually while dogfights. So the wing sweep depends on the airspeed; it will spread out the wings at low speed to give more stability and lift force and sweep backward at high speed to reduce drag (force). As a result, this airplane is stable at both low and high speeds.
@ChamDel78 i am in New York, which time zone in GMT-7 and people still get time to upload. I will close tonight (which will be 23rd on other side of the globe)
I was building loosely out of my imagination with the mixed influence of the real planes that I saw. I haven't laid out any blueprints and followed except the Vickers VC10 @ChamDel78
@ChamDel78 Lol, yes, it will still fit for the solid challenge, but I did not limit it to solid blocks only in that challenge. So it will be hard compared to others, which will be using regular editable fuselage blocks.
No problem @Planeplant
@ThereIsNoahScape oh yes, it is based on the MiG27 that I posted on your challenge. Too late
I was trying to spotlight this but I have exceeded the max amount for today. I was spot lighting people for my challenge yesterday @MitchellAviation
+1Thank you @TRD @Reworkable @MDDJB @SsKyCoSs
+2Awesome
@Zaineman "technology transfer" please....lol
That's awesome @GuyFolk -
@Zaineman look at this
@Panzerwaifu69 I was hoping you got the #1st place, I am sorry. But I vote for you personally. It is a fun one. Yes, B36 is the best example. Always keep the engines towards the main fuselage. The horizontal stabilizers need some sweep angle to match the wing sweep too. Also, I would put a 4-wheel bogie instead of 2 landing gear. (or) check the Heinkel He 177 landing gear that is cool. It is a heavy bomber about the size of this fictional one you are building
+1This is one of the nicest plane to fly during the challenge. I love that pusher propeller too. It will be great if the engines are sticking together towards the fuselage (center line of thrust) like the real ones. And landing gear placement.
+1It is.a nice plane to fly. But 900mph is too fast for WW2, which the haven’t passed the sound barrier (764mph) at that time. And no prop fighters do. That’s why. Historic facts bring you points @ChamDel78
+1Very cool. Not only the cockpit, but the plane too
This is super awesome
+1So the winners are...
1st Place: Arado AR-234 @Planeplant
2nd Place: Grumman-TBF-1C-Avenger @Raiquaza19AirComp
3rd Place: Diesler-Di-40-A-2-Tulip @TWDDerSharkmarine
Honorable Works:
Heinkel-He-309A-Teufelsvogel @Panzerwaifu69
Horten-Vought-292-Bullet-Biter @MitchellAviation
Junkers-ju-188-a2 @PlaneGuy01
Stipa-Caproni-Bomber @ChamDel78
I try my best to judge the builds from the engineering point of view - and believable the built (no matter replica or fictional) gets more points. Speed, engine placements and historical accuracy gain more points.
I am upvoting you all as soon as I can. Thank you very much for joining.
beautiful and very graceful my friend. great job as usual
+1Keep it up. I would remove both tail rotors according to engineering/physics principles
@NobleMobileUser Thanks for the reminder. I have reported that
Very cool
+1awesome
Wow nice
+1Download this plane at https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/3J0oSq/MiG-27-M2-auto-sweep-wing-Block-Build-Challenge
+1Awesome, nice story
@Zaineman @MrCOPTY try this -
Thank you all for upvote this again. I want to edit and improve the horizontal stabilizers from the pervious plane. So I have update and delete the pervious post. I don’t want to keep too many similar ones - @Reworkable @Aviator01 @Echoster @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL @T8flight @BeastHunter @Shimamurahougetsu @Bryan5
+2Lol, cockpit is not really my interest, I just did something "acceptable ones" only @Reworkable my main focus is on airplanes and different flight technology
+1Thank you guys! @YEEEETplane @BeastHunter @jamesPLANESii @Aviator01 @Bryan5 @PlaneGuy01 @Dragoranos @MitchellAviation
+1Featuring AUTOMATIC WING SWEEP
With auto wing sweep, you don't need to shift the wing position manually while dogfights. So the wing sweep depends on the airspeed; it will spread out the wings at low speed to give more stability and lift force and sweep backward at high speed to reduce drag (force). As a result, this airplane is stable at both low and high speeds.
Lol, thanks @ThereIsNoahScape
+1Thanks
click? @ThereIsNoahScape
@ThereIsNoahScape try this one, you will love it
@Zaineman @MrCOPTY
UP UP UP UP!!!!
@Reworkable @WolfHunter9111 @MrCOPTY can any of you have a good definition on "German" built - I am still not so clear about that
+1My buddy @Zaineman is a "cockpit guru"
+1@ChamDel78 i am in New York, which time zone in GMT-7 and people still get time to upload. I will close tonight (which will be 23rd on other side of the globe)
This is a big air defense station. Cool
Nice
@MrCOPTY I see. Thanks!
+1I was building loosely out of my imagination with the mixed influence of the real planes that I saw. I haven't laid out any blueprints and followed except the Vickers VC10 @ChamDel78
@ChamDel78 Thank you buddy
@ChamDel78 Lol, yes, it will still fit for the solid challenge, but I did not limit it to solid blocks only in that challenge. So it will be hard compared to others, which will be using regular editable fuselage blocks.
Thanks @BeastHunter
+1@MrCOPTY thanks buddy
@Jaspy190 oh why ?
I see, lol @YEEEETplane
Thanks @Calvinfl101 @YEEEETplane @Jaspy190 @Shimamurahougetsu @WINGSIRON @MitchellAviation
@MrCOPTY here is my "German" built
I wish! Thank you. who know,,, there are lots of great builder than me @ThereIsNoahScape
@ThereIsNoahScape Lol, thank you
this is awesome, I am spotlighting
+1too fast, lol @Reworkable I am writing here :P
+1nice, keep it up