@F82Mustang Ouch! it was not a successor and so I did not see it while judging. Sorry for that. But next time when you enter a challenge, be sure your plane is a successor. For this time, I will give you 3 upvotes as a welcome gift
Hi @Mostly I came across your profile while looking the SimpleRockets2. I have never used SR2 before, but how do you compare between SP and SR2? I think SP is for more realistic staff and SR is just for fun - not as serious as SP. What is your opinion? (by the way, THIS IS A GREAT BUILD with lots of variants)
@AndrewGarrison as a Graphic Designer for 20+ years, I really suggest reconsidering the SP logo. It doesn't reflect the taste of this game. I never look into this game for many years because the logo doesn't communicate as a serious building game, instead, I thought it was made for 5-year-old kids
@AndrewGarrison Hi Andrew, I suggest User Interface UI updates for SimplePlanes and a few more parts. Category and folders to organize., etc. Please do not leave the SP behind because I feel it is more realistic and serious
@MrCOPTY True - yes and no. Because you are still in school, your education is a fast priority - unlike me. I don't have to worry much except making money
The following points are cancelled out since all three looks pretty much the same
* Cleaver use of XML 5 pt
* Historical facts about your plane 5pt
* Creativity/ cool factor 5 pt
@Australianbulider676 No, I never have alt account- which is against the rule. Even so, I am too busy with a single account. I just built what ever pleases me. But, I simply get up votes. Maybe because I read lots of airplanes staff, history, and so I could bring up interesting topics
@WolfHunter9111 oh yes. I mean Ka-52. Thanks
+2Upvote! for the great build and
+3also for the disclaimeranother Helicopter-fan has to spotlight this religiously :)
+2@Rjenteissussy LOL exactly
+1@Rjenteissussy thanks, lol
+1Looking great build and XML - also thanks @MrCOPTY
+1@Mostly Thanks for letting me know about this insight. Wow, that's why I did not see much cooperation and sharing in SR
Great work. Download and still testing.
+1@WolfHunter9111 Lol, inspired by Karmov Ka-50
+2@AndrewGarrison I mean the SP logo on the app icon for mobiles/ipad
+1@F82Mustang Ouch! it was not a successor and so I did not see it while judging. Sorry for that. But next time when you enter a challenge, be sure your plane is a successor. For this time, I will give you 3 upvotes as a welcome gift
@Bryan5 Oh Nice - Sorry Bryan that I could not join that. It was a nice story line that you host -
+1Hi @Mostly I came across your profile while looking the SimpleRockets2. I have never used SR2 before, but how do you compare between SP and SR2? I think SP is for more realistic staff and SR is just for fun - not as serious as SP. What is your opinion? (by the way, THIS IS A GREAT BUILD with lots of variants)
+1@AndrewGarrison as a Graphic Designer for 20+ years, I really suggest reconsidering the SP logo. It doesn't reflect the taste of this game. I never look into this game for many years because the logo doesn't communicate as a serious building game, instead, I thought it was made for 5-year-old kids
+13@AndrewGarrison Hi Andrew, I suggest User Interface UI updates for SimplePlanes and a few more parts. Category and folders to organize., etc. Please do not leave the SP behind because I feel it is more realistic and serious
+3@MrCOPTY They will do it if they like it, You got to wait. Maybe the Curators are busy. It took 2-4 days for most of my builds
+1@Timothy19452022 I have add your name in the list :)
very cool
T. this is a really neat idea. Tag me please
+1@Zaineman Thanks buddy
@Timothy19452022 Okay, I will do, and tag you once I post
@MrCOPTY Yes, of course.
+1@MrCOPTY Thank you for sharing on XML staff. I will look into into it
+1@Zaineman Nice laptop Zaine, cool
+1@Kangy my pleasure
congratulation
you are lucky in time -
+1I run out of my spotlight capability for today right after spotlighting you
@Sergio666 this is 2 PM in New York, which is my working hour. So if you post at this time, I may not see or able to vote at first place
I am the first to UPVOTE! unfortunately, I ran out of my spotlight capability for today
good job @MrCOPTY
+1@MrCOPTY Lol, unable to correct any more. This plane was curated
+1@MrCOPTY where is that error?
+1@MrCOPTY and I would proud to know that one day you could be someone - these points are not important
+1@MrCOPTY True - yes and no. Because you are still in school, your education is a fast priority - unlike me. I don't have to worry much except making money
+1@MrCOPTY well, I discovered that now. And this plane is important to me. since we stated following each other
+1@Rework I see
@MrCOPTY your congrats from 6 months ago on 30K, So I discovered that I made 30K on the first 6 months, and 70K on later 6 months (total 1 year) LOL
@Zaineman Nice
+1Congratulations to the winners! I have upvoted all
+1The Winners are
1st Place: Yak-52 by @Kangy
TOTAL 26 points
2nd Place: Folland Gnat by @AquiliusEpic
TOTAL 25 points
3rd Place: SU-26 by @Gabriel747
TOTAL 21 points
The following points are cancelled out since all three looks pretty much the same
* Cleaver use of XML 5 pt
* Historical facts about your plane 5pt
* Creativity/ cool factor 5 pt
Friends, I would love to see if you could use this engine on one of your build
@Ulardox yes that's true
+1woooooow flat like a stingray
No worry even if six engines fail :P
@Australianbulider676 No, I never have alt account- which is against the rule. Even so, I am too busy with a single account. I just built what ever pleases me. But, I simply get up votes. Maybe because I read lots of airplanes staff, history, and so I could bring up interesting topics
I am posting the winners tomorrow, sorry that taking for a while I was busy at my job once the holidays over
+2@Zaineman, @MrCOPTY look at this principle of aviation - you will be enlightened!
+1@Gabriel747 Thanks again
I am sorry if I missed someone,, please let me know, I will add in the list
@Gabriel747 Sorry for missing out, I will add right now, still adding more names